| Message ID | 1398800999-9814-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
On 04/29/2014 09:49 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > The following commit: > > commit 9ec36cafe43bf835f8f29273597a5b0cbc8267ef > Author: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > Date: Wed Apr 23 17:57:41 2014 -0500 > > of/irq: do irq resolution in platform_get_irq > > changed platform_get_irq() which now returns ENODEV and EPROBE_DEFER, > in addition to ENXIO. If there's no interrupt for mvmdio, platform_get_irq() > returns ENODEV, but we currently check only for ENXIO. > > Fix this by looking for a positive integer, which is the proper way of > validating a virtual interrupt number. > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c > index b161a52..eb2cabf 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static int orion_mdio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > clk_prepare_enable(dev->clk); > > dev->err_interrupt = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > - if (dev->err_interrupt != -ENXIO) { > + if (dev->err_interrupt > 0) { Ezequiel, I cannot find where Rob's mentioned patch set adds -ENODEV, but isn't the semantic for -EPROBE_DEFER: there *should* be an irq, but it is not yet available. That basically means, we should also defer on that error otherwise we would ignore that we have actually been given an irq to work with, right? Sebastian > ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, dev->err_interrupt, > orion_mdio_err_irq, > IRQF_SHARED, pdev->name, dev); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Apr 29, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 04/29/2014 09:49 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > The following commit: > > > > commit 9ec36cafe43bf835f8f29273597a5b0cbc8267ef > > Author: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > Date: Wed Apr 23 17:57:41 2014 -0500 > > > > of/irq: do irq resolution in platform_get_irq > > > > changed platform_get_irq() which now returns ENODEV and EPROBE_DEFER, > > in addition to ENXIO. If there's no interrupt for mvmdio, platform_get_irq() > > returns ENODEV, but we currently check only for ENXIO. > > > > Fix this by looking for a positive integer, which is the proper way of > > validating a virtual interrupt number. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c > > index b161a52..eb2cabf 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c > > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static int orion_mdio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > clk_prepare_enable(dev->clk); > > > > dev->err_interrupt = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > > - if (dev->err_interrupt != -ENXIO) { > > + if (dev->err_interrupt > 0) { > > Ezequiel, > > I cannot find where Rob's mentioned patch set adds -ENODEV, but isn't Well, I don't think it's not mentioned in the patch. The path is: platform_get_irq -> of_irq_get -> of_irq_parse_one -> EINVAL. So it's EINVAL, not ENODEV. But the lesson is to avoid checking for a particular error (except EPROBE_DEFER which is special) because it's a fragile practice. > the semantic for -EPROBE_DEFER: there *should* be an irq, but it is > not yet available. That basically means, we should also defer on that > error otherwise we would ignore that we have actually been given an irq > to work with, right? > Yes, I agree. Did another patch for that, but haven't send it yet. AFAICS, mvebu platforms will never hit the deferred case as the irqchip is the first driver registered (as per drivers/Makefile). Not that we should count on that :)
On 04/30/2014 01:42 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Apr 29, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >> On 04/29/2014 09:49 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >>> The following commit: >>> >>> commit 9ec36cafe43bf835f8f29273597a5b0cbc8267ef >>> Author: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >>> Date: Wed Apr 23 17:57:41 2014 -0500 >>> >>> of/irq: do irq resolution in platform_get_irq >>> >>> changed platform_get_irq() which now returns ENODEV and EPROBE_DEFER, >>> in addition to ENXIO. If there's no interrupt for mvmdio, platform_get_irq() >>> returns ENODEV, but we currently check only for ENXIO. >>> >>> Fix this by looking for a positive integer, which is the proper way of >>> validating a virtual interrupt number. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c >>> index b161a52..eb2cabf 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c >>> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static int orion_mdio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> clk_prepare_enable(dev->clk); >>> >>> dev->err_interrupt = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); >>> - if (dev->err_interrupt != -ENXIO) { >>> + if (dev->err_interrupt > 0) { >> >> Ezequiel, >> >> I cannot find where Rob's mentioned patch set adds -ENODEV, but isn't > > Well, I don't think it's not mentioned in the patch. The path is: > > platform_get_irq -> of_irq_get -> of_irq_parse_one -> EINVAL. > > So it's EINVAL, not ENODEV. But the lesson is to avoid checking for > a particular error (except EPROBE_DEFER which is special) because > it's a fragile practice. Ok, thanks for the clarification. >> the semantic for -EPROBE_DEFER: there *should* be an irq, but it is >> not yet available. That basically means, we should also defer on that >> error otherwise we would ignore that we have actually been given an irq >> to work with, right? >> > > Yes, I agree. Did another patch for that, but haven't send it yet. > AFAICS, mvebu platforms will never hit the deferred case as the irqchip > is the first driver registered (as per drivers/Makefile). > > Not that we should count on that :) It doesn't hit it _now_ because of the above. I read about proper platform_device for early devices here and there over and over again, so I guess some day it may become an issue. As we know about the potential -EPROBE_DEFER now, I suggest to deal with it now, too. Can you resend this as v2 with the other patch you mentioned squashed in? Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Apr 30, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > As we know about the potential -EPROBE_DEFER now, I suggest to > deal with it now, too. > > Can you resend this as v2 with the other patch you mentioned > squashed in? > Sure. I did that first, but then wasn't sure about squashing both changes. Thanks for helping out,
On Apr 30, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > > >Yes, I agree. Did another patch for that, but haven't send it yet. > >AFAICS, mvebu platforms will never hit the deferred case as the irqchip > >is the first driver registered (as per drivers/Makefile). > > > >Not that we should count on that :) > > It doesn't hit it _now_ because of the above. I read about proper > platform_device for early devices here and there over and over > again, so I guess some day it may become an issue. > > As we know about the potential -EPROBE_DEFER now, I suggest to > deal with it now, too. > > Can you resend this as v2 with the other patch you mentioned > squashed in? > Oh! I've just remembered why I didn't send the EPROBE_DEFER patch in the first place. The mvneta driver connects to the phy at open()-time, in a function called "mvneta_mdio_probe()". This name confused me to think the mdio was really probed at open()-time. I guess it was very late at night when I came to such conclusion :)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c index b161a52..eb2cabf 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static int orion_mdio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) clk_prepare_enable(dev->clk); dev->err_interrupt = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); - if (dev->err_interrupt != -ENXIO) { + if (dev->err_interrupt > 0) { ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, dev->err_interrupt, orion_mdio_err_irq, IRQF_SHARED, pdev->name, dev);
The following commit: commit 9ec36cafe43bf835f8f29273597a5b0cbc8267ef Author: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Date: Wed Apr 23 17:57:41 2014 -0500 of/irq: do irq resolution in platform_get_irq changed platform_get_irq() which now returns ENODEV and EPROBE_DEFER, in addition to ENXIO. If there's no interrupt for mvmdio, platform_get_irq() returns ENODEV, but we currently check only for ENXIO. Fix this by looking for a positive integer, which is the proper way of validating a virtual interrupt number. Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)