Message ID | cover.1392962498.git.horms+renesas@verge.net.au |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:11:58PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > Please consider this Renesas ARM based SoC intc updates for v3.15. > > Previously merging code for this driver was handled Paul Mundt > as part of his maintenance of SUPERH. However, SUPERH is in > the process of being orphaned. And as this driver is also listed > as being maintained by Magnus and myself as part of ARM/SHMOBILE ARM > I have picked up this patch. > > If you would prefer not to handle this that is quite fine by me but in that > case I would appreciate advice on where I should send pull-requests. Do you anticipate any new development besides some minor one-off fixes and touching code that's related to shmobile/sh reworks? If it's a low-volume thing that is likely to mostly have overlap with arm-soc/shmobile stuff then we might just as well take most of it. Otherwise, I think most architecture maintainers send things directly to Linus. Either way, I'll merge this for now. -Olof
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:29:07PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:11:58PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > Please consider this Renesas ARM based SoC intc updates for v3.15. > > > > Previously merging code for this driver was handled Paul Mundt > > as part of his maintenance of SUPERH. However, SUPERH is in > > the process of being orphaned. And as this driver is also listed > > as being maintained by Magnus and myself as part of ARM/SHMOBILE ARM > > I have picked up this patch. > > > > If you would prefer not to handle this that is quite fine by me but in that > > case I would appreciate advice on where I should send pull-requests. > > Do you anticipate any new development besides some minor one-off fixes and > touching code that's related to shmobile/sh reworks? > > If it's a low-volume thing that is likely to mostly have overlap with > arm-soc/shmobile stuff then we might just as well take most of it. Otherwise, > I think most architecture maintainers send things directly to Linus. > > Either way, I'll merge this for now. Hi Olof, at this stage I am not expecting major developments of drivers under drivers/sh. But I do expect minor fixes, improvements, Kconfig updates, etc... I am more than happy to start sending things to Linus. But perhaps this time it would be easiest for you to take this one.