===================================================================
@@ -22,11 +22,16 @@
unwanted sequences. Thus, if we see any movt insns, something is not
working as expected. This test requires -O2 because the T bit stores
in question will be eliminated in additional insn split passes after
- reload. */
+ reload.
+
+ Notice: When this test case was initially added, the T bit optimization
+ was buggy and this test case resulted in wrong code. The movt
+ instructions actually have to be present in this case to get
+ correct code. */
/* { dg-do compile { target "sh*-*-*" } } */
/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
/* { dg-skip-if "" { "sh*-*-*" } { "-m5*" } { "" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "movt" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "movt" } } */
struct request
{
===================================================================
@@ -8427,11 +8427,9 @@
while (true)
{
- /* It's not safe to go beyond the current basic block after reload. */
set_of_reg s1 = sh_find_set_of_reg (tested_reg, s0.insn,
- reload_completed
- ? prev_nonnote_insn_bb
- : prev_nonnote_insn);
+ prev_nonnote_insn);
+
if (s1.set_src == NULL_RTX)
break;
@@ -8449,15 +8447,25 @@
continue;
}
- /* It's only safe to remove the testing insn if the T bit is not
- modified between the testing insn and the insn that stores the
- T bit. Notice that some T bit stores such as negc also modify
- the T bit. */
- if (modified_between_p (get_t_reg_rtx (), s1.insn, testing_insn)
- || modified_in_p (get_t_reg_rtx (), s1.insn))
- operands[2] = NULL_RTX;
+ /* It's only safe to remove the testing insn if the T bit is not
+ modified between the testing insn and the insn that stores the
+ T bit. Notice that some T bit stores such as negc also modify
+ the T bit. */
+ if (modified_between_p (get_t_reg_rtx (), s1.insn, testing_insn)
+ || modified_in_p (get_t_reg_rtx (), s1.insn)
+ || !no_labels_between_p (s1.insn, testing_insn))
+ operands[2] = NULL_RTX;
+ else
+ {
+ /* If the insn that sets the tested reg has a REG_DEAD note on
+ the T bit remove that note since we're extending the usage
+ of the T bit. */
+ rtx n = find_regno_note (s1.insn, REG_DEAD, T_REG);
+ if (n != NULL_RTX)
+ remove_note (s1.insn, n);
+ }
- break;
+ break;
}
if (operands[2] == NULL_RTX)
Hello, This fixes a bug on the 4.8 branch which was initially described in PR 51244 comment 59 and also reported as a separate PR 59343. Tested with make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}" and no new failures. OK for 4.8? Cheers, Oleg gcc/ChangeLog: PR target/51244 PR target/59343 * config/sh/sh.md (*cbranch_t): Check that there are no labels between the s1 insn and the testing insn. Remove REG_DEAD note from s1 insn. testsuite/ChangeLog: PR target/51244 PR target/59343 * gcc.target/sh/pr51244-19.c: Adjust test case.