Message ID | CAN1soZxcmHMABTGi6FBtXysmY0TwWx7cdEvf1_ycHv2RtCLcpw@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi, On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:13:14PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote: > Hi Arnd & Olof, > > Please help to pull armsoc/dt branch from pxa git tree. These patches > are used to enable hi3xxx SoC > and they're depend on Rob's clock source patches. > > Regards > Haojian > > The following changes since commit f6161aa153581da4a3867a2d1a7caf4be19b6ec9: > > Linux 3.9-rc2 (2013-03-10 16:54:19 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://github.com/hzhuang1/linux.git armsoc/dt First of all, please try to move your repo somewhere else than github. We really prefer to see signed tags when repos come from github or gitorious or other similar sites. Maybe you can get a linaro git repo instead? That's not a showstopper in this case though, since there's only a few patches here and easy for us to review. A couple of more important comments below. > Haojian Zhuang (6): > devtree: add binding documentation for sp804 > ARM: debug: support debug ll on hisilicon soc > clk: hi3xxx: add clock support I didn't see an Acked-by from Mike Turquette on this one. Since this driver is an addition to his subsystem, I would like to see one. It could even go through his tree since this is all new platform code. Not only that, but when I went searching for email to find reviews of this patch, I see that Arnd had a round of comments including a request to move hs_init_clocks() that, according to the email, was addressed but this patch does not seem to have moved. > ARM: hi3xxx: add board support with device tree > ARM: hi3xxx: enable hi4511 with device tree > ARM: config: append arch hi3xxx into multi defconfig Given the comments above, and the currently late time for 3.10, I think this will be better held off for more review and a merge for 3.11. Please get the above taken care of and resubmit to us as soon as 3.10-rc1 is out and we'll stage it for 3.11. The code does look nice and clean and looks to be in good shape, so there should be no problem to get it in for 3.10. -Olof
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:13:14PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote: >> Hi Arnd & Olof, >> >> Please help to pull armsoc/dt branch from pxa git tree. These patches >> are used to enable hi3xxx SoC >> and they're depend on Rob's clock source patches. >> >> Regards >> Haojian >> >> The following changes since commit f6161aa153581da4a3867a2d1a7caf4be19b6ec9: >> >> Linux 3.9-rc2 (2013-03-10 16:54:19 -0700) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://github.com/hzhuang1/linux.git armsoc/dt > > First of all, please try to move your repo somewhere else than github. We > really prefer to see signed tags when repos come from github or gitorious > or other similar sites. Maybe you can get a linaro git repo instead? > Sure. Let me move the git repo and use tags for pull request. > That's not a showstopper in this case though, since there's only a few > patches here and easy for us to review. > > A couple of more important comments below. > >> Haojian Zhuang (6): >> devtree: add binding documentation for sp804 >> ARM: debug: support debug ll on hisilicon soc >> clk: hi3xxx: add clock support > > I didn't see an Acked-by from Mike Turquette on this one. Since this driver is > an addition to his subsystem, I would like to see one. It could even go through > his tree since this is all new platform code. > I'll resend these patches and wait Mike to Ack them. > Not only that, but when I went searching for email to find reviews of this > patch, I see that Arnd had a round of comments including a request to move > hs_init_clocks() that, according to the email, was addressed but this patch > does not seem to have moved. > >> ARM: hi3xxx: add board support with device tree >> ARM: hi3xxx: enable hi4511 with device tree >> ARM: config: append arch hi3xxx into multi defconfig > > Given the comments above, and the currently late time for 3.10, I think this > will be better held off for more review and a merge for 3.11. Please get the > above taken care of and resubmit to us as soon as 3.10-rc1 is out and we'll > stage it for 3.11. The code does look nice and clean and looks to be in good > shape, so there should be no problem to get it in for 3.10. > I'm OK for 3.11 merge window. Regards Haojian