diff mbox

[v2] include/linux: printk is needed in filter.h when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is defined

Message ID 515657BF.7010101@asianux.com
State Not Applicable, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Chen Gang March 30, 2013, 3:10 a.m. UTC
On 2013年03月30日 03:34, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:24:53 +0800
> 
>> > 
>> >   for make V=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W ARCH=arm allmodconfig
>> >     printk is need when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is defined
>> >     or it will report pr_err and print_hex_dump are implicit declaration
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
> There are no references to pr_err nor print_hex_dump in this
> filter.h header file.

  maybe we see the different tree.
  I find it in next-20130328.

  please help check, thanks.


commit 79617801ea0c0e6664cb497d4c1892c2ff407364
Author: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Mar 21 22:22:03 2013 +0100

    filter: bpf_jit_comp: refactor and unify BPF JIT image dump output
    
    If bpf_jit_enable > 1, then we dump the emitted JIT compiled image
    after creation. Currently, only SPARC and PowerPC has similar output
    as in the reference implementation on x86_64. Make a small helper
    function in order to reduce duplicated code and make the dump output
    uniform across architectures x86_64, SPARC, PPC, ARM (e.g. on ARM
    flen, pass and proglen are currently not shown, but would be
    interesting to know as well), also for future BPF JIT implementations
    on other archs.
    
    Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>
    Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
    Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@google.com>
    Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
    Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Comments

David Miller March 30, 2013, 3:32 a.m. UTC | #1
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:10:55 +0800

> On 2013年03月30日 03:34, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:24:53 +0800
>> 
>>> > 
>>> >   for make V=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W ARCH=arm allmodconfig
>>> >     printk is need when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is defined
>>> >     or it will report pr_err and print_hex_dump are implicit declaration
>>> > 
>>> > Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
>> There are no references to pr_err nor print_hex_dump in this
>> filter.h header file.
> 
>   maybe we see the different tree.
>   I find it in next-20130328.

When you submit patches, always mention explicitly what tree you
want the patch applied to.

In this case, this appropriate tree to be "net-next" since that
is the tree where the problem actually exists.

Patch applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Chen Gang March 30, 2013, 3:41 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2013年03月30日 11:32, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
> Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:10:55 +0800
> 
>> > On 2013$BG/(B03$B7n(B30$BF|(B 03:34, David Miller wrote:
>>> >> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
>>> >> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:24:53 +0800
>>> >> 
>>>>> >>> > 
>>>>> >>> >   for make V=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W ARCH=arm allmodconfig
>>>>> >>> >     printk is need when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is defined
>>>>> >>> >     or it will report pr_err and print_hex_dump are implicit declaration
>>>>> >>> > 
>>>>> >>> > Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
>>> >> There are no references to pr_err nor print_hex_dump in this
>>> >> filter.h header file.
>> > 
>> >   maybe we see the different tree.
>> >   I find it in next-20130328.
> When you submit patches, always mention explicitly what tree you
> want the patch applied to.
> 
> In this case, this appropriate tree to be "net-next" since that
> is the tree where the problem actually exists.

  I should notice, next time.

> 
> Patch applied, thanks.
> 
> 

  thanks, too.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index d2059cb..d7d2508 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -50,6 +50,16 @@  extern int sk_get_filter(struct sock *sk, struct sock_filter __user *filter, uns
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
 extern void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp);
 extern void bpf_jit_free(struct sk_filter *fp);
+
+static inline void bpf_jit_dump(unsigned int flen, unsigned int proglen,
+                               u32 pass, void *image)
+{
+       pr_err("flen=%u proglen=%u pass=%u image=%p\n",
+              flen, proglen, pass, image);
+       if (image)
+               print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "JIT code: ", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS,
+                              16, 1, image, proglen, false);
+}
 #define SK_RUN_FILTER(FILTER, SKB) (*FILTER->bpf_func)(SKB, FILTER->insns)
 #else
 static inline void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)