mbox

[GIT,PULL] first set of ux500 for ARM SoC for v3.8

Message ID CACRpkdasaP_xVfQtzq29UNJBXetrUUzqpn90T6_Gr0kOsV8GeQ@mail.gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-stericsson.git

Message

Linus Walleij Oct. 18, 2012, 6:39 p.m. UTC
Hi ARM SoC folks,

here are two small commits for v3.8 that I'd like to make sure
land in ARM SoC before I begin with all the other stuff.

Please pull them in!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

The following changes since commit ddffeb8c4d0331609ef2581d84de4d763607bd37:

  Linux 3.7-rc1 (2012-10-14 14:41:04 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-stericsson.git
ux500-core

for you to fetch changes up to 4040d10a3d44023703f81083bb90a3eb45a39eee:

  ARM: ux500: add DB serial number to entropy pool (2012-10-15 13:53:55 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
A first set of Ux500 core patches for v3.8:
- Support the HREF520 board
- Add the device serial number to the entropy pool

----------------------------------------------------------------
Linus Walleij (2):
      ARM: ux500: support the HREFP520 board variant
      ARM: ux500: add DB serial number to entropy pool

 arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c   |  5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Linus Walleij Oct. 25, 2012, 7:22 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:

> Hi ARM SoC folks,
>
> here are two small commits for v3.8 that I'd like to make sure
> land in ARM SoC before I begin with all the other stuff.
>
> Please pull them in!

Ping on this.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Arnd Bergmann Oct. 25, 2012, 1:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thursday 25 October 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi ARM SoC folks,
> >
> > here are two small commits for v3.8 that I'd like to make sure
> > land in ARM SoC before I begin with all the other stuff.
> >
> > Please pull them in!
> 
> Ping on this.

Sorry for the delay, I just took over the task to pull in stuff from Olof
and we were both busy otherwise earlier.

I pulled this into a next/soc branch now. Wasn't completely sure which
branch to use but I figured that we couldn't make a good prediction of
the ordering yet, and we'll probably have a next/soc2 branch later anyway.

Please remember to write the pull request in a way that lets us reuse some
of the text for the merge changeset comment. Ideally in a signed tag
so git puts it in there automatically.

	Arnd
Linus Walleij Oct. 25, 2012, 2:37 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> Please remember to write the pull request in a way that lets us reuse some
> of the text for the merge changeset comment. Ideally in a signed tag
> so git puts it in there automatically.

So what was wrong with this signed tag, looking like that?

----------------------------------------------------------------
A first set of Ux500 core patches for v3.8:
- Support the HREF520 board
- Add the device serial number to the entropy pool

----------------------------------------------------------------

I guess what I'm after is what makes it reusable if this one
isn't.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Arnd Bergmann Oct. 25, 2012, 3:13 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thursday 25 October 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> 
> > Please remember to write the pull request in a way that lets us reuse some
> > of the text for the merge changeset comment. Ideally in a signed tag
> > so git puts it in there automatically.
> 
> So what was wrong with this signed tag, looking like that?
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> A first set of Ux500 core patches for v3.8:
> - Support the HREF520 board
> - Add the device serial number to the entropy pool
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I guess what I'm after is what makes it reusable if this one
> isn't.

The tag looks great, but you were sending the pull request for
the branch "ux500-core", not for the tag "ux500-core-for-arm-soc".

This has happened to me a few times before, especially when pushing
the tag just before sending the pull request. In that case,
git-request-pull cannot find the tag on the server because it has
not been mirrored back from the git+ssh server to the publically
accessible one that it reads the tags from.

	Arnd
Linus Walleij Oct. 25, 2012, 3:58 p.m. UTC | #5
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> The tag looks great, but you were sending the pull request for
> the branch "ux500-core", not for the tag "ux500-core-for-arm-soc".
>
> This has happened to me a few times before, especially when pushing
> the tag just before sending the pull request. In that case,
> git-request-pull cannot find the tag on the server because it has
> not been mirrored back from the git+ssh server to the publically
> accessible one that it reads the tags from.

Ah yes this mirror thing is a bit dangerous, I usually check it
by inspecting the warning message that request-pull generates,
but must've missed it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij