Message ID | 1348142956-1872-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:09:09PM +0200, Lee Jones wrote: > The following changes since commit 5698bd757d55b1bb87edd1a9744ab09c142abfc2: > > Linux 3.6-rc6 (2012-09-16 14:58:51 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git for-asoc-next Pulled, thanks.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:09:09PM +0200, Lee Jones wrote: > > The following changes since commit 5698bd757d55b1bb87edd1a9744ab09c142abfc2: > > > > Linux 3.6-rc6 (2012-09-16 14:58:51 -0700) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git for-asoc-next > > Pulled, thanks. Nice! Thanks Mark.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:09:09PM +0200, Lee Jones wrote: > > The following changes since commit 5698bd757d55b1bb87edd1a9744ab09c142abfc2: > > > > Linux 3.6-rc6 (2012-09-16 14:58:51 -0700) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git for-asoc-next > > Pulled, thanks. Hi Mark, Is there any reason why the following patches didn't make it into -next? ASoC: codecs: Enable AB8500 CODEC for Device Tree ASoC: Ux500: Enable ux500 MSP driver for Device Tree Kind regards, Lee
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 04:01:19PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > Is there any reason why the following patches didn't make it into -next? > ASoC: codecs: Enable AB8500 CODEC for Device Tree > ASoC: Ux500: Enable ux500 MSP driver for Device Tree They appear to be there, there's certainly no reason why they'd be any different to the rest of the series.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 04:01:19PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Is there any reason why the following patches didn't make it into -next? > > > ASoC: codecs: Enable AB8500 CODEC for Device Tree > > ASoC: Ux500: Enable ux500 MSP driver for Device Tree > > They appear to be there, there's certainly no reason why they'd be any > different to the rest of the series. Okay, I see what's happened. When I rebased the patches I had in my local delta git just reapplied the commits instead of throwing them out. I can confirm that the patches above have been applied to -next after all. Thanks again, Lee