Message ID | 20241030104717.88688-1-bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Implement setup_inteface() in the DaVinci NAND controller | expand |
On 30/10/2024 11:47, Bastien Curutchet wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch series aims to implement the setup_interface() operation in > the DaVinci NAND controller to enable the use of all ONFI modes and > improve the NAND access speed. > Your changelog is supposed to explain also merging dependencies. Within patchset or external. > This NAND controller is present in the DaVinci (OMAP L138) and Keystone2 > SoCs and functions as a 'child' of the AEMIF controller. So its timings > are set by the AEMIF controller itself from device-tree properties. > Implementing the setup_interface() callback implies being able to update > dynamically these timings, so the first two patches of the series modify > the AEMIF driver to provide its 'children' a way to modify their chip > select timing configuration. To do so, I add a ti-aemif.h header, I'm not > sure whether this header should be located in include/memory or in > include/linux/memory. I put it in include/memory because the folder > already exists while include/linux/memory doesn't. All Linux headers go to include/linux/, so this one should as well. Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof, On 10/30/24 12:17 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 30/10/2024 11:47, Bastien Curutchet wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This patch series aims to implement the setup_interface() operation in >> the DaVinci NAND controller to enable the use of all ONFI modes and >> improve the NAND access speed. >> > > Your changelog is supposed to explain also merging dependencies. Within > patchset or external. I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. Do you mean that I need to explicitly state that the patches in the drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c depend on the ones in drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c ? There isn't any external dependency on this patch series. The ONFI modes are already managed by the NAND core driver (in drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c). If a NAND controller wants to benefit from all the ONFI modes, it needs to implement the setup_interface() operation; otherwise it can only use the mode 0 which is the slowest. > >> This NAND controller is present in the DaVinci (OMAP L138) and Keystone2 >> SoCs and functions as a 'child' of the AEMIF controller. So its timings >> are set by the AEMIF controller itself from device-tree properties. >> Implementing the setup_interface() callback implies being able to update >> dynamically these timings, so the first two patches of the series modify >> the AEMIF driver to provide its 'children' a way to modify their chip >> select timing configuration. To do so, I add a ti-aemif.h header, I'm not >> sure whether this header should be located in include/memory or in >> include/linux/memory. I put it in include/memory because the folder >> already exists while include/linux/memory doesn't. > > All Linux headers go to include/linux/, so this one should as well. > Ok thank you, I'll move it there in V2. Best regards, Bastien
On 30/10/2024 13:39, Bastien Curutchet wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 10/30/24 12:17 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 30/10/2024 11:47, Bastien Curutchet wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This patch series aims to implement the setup_interface() operation in >>> the DaVinci NAND controller to enable the use of all ONFI modes and >>> improve the NAND access speed. >>> >> >> Your changelog is supposed to explain also merging dependencies. Within >> patchset or external. > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. Do you mean that I need to > explicitly state that the patches in the > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c depend on the ones in > drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c ? Well, you target different subsystems, so maintainers need to know what they can take and what do you expect of them. Otherwise what do you expect of me exactly and how can I guess it? Best regards, Krzysztof