| Message ID | 20240927170825.1889455-1-mmichels@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [ovs-dev] northd: Track max ACL tiers more accurately. | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ovsrobot/apply-robot | success | apply and check: success |
| ovsrobot/github-robot-_Build_and_Test | success | github build: passed |
| ovsrobot/github-robot-_ovn-kubernetes | fail | github build: failed |
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 7:15 PM Mark Michelson <mmichels@redhat.com> wrote: > When ACL tiers were introduced, the code kept track of the highest ACL > tier so that when iterating through ACL tiers, we would not attempt to > advance the current tier past the highest configured tier. > > Unfortunately, keeping track of a single max ACL tier doesn't work when > ACLs are evaluated in three separate places. ACLs can be evaluated on > ingress before load balancing, on ingress after load balancing, and on > egress. By only keeping track of a single max ACL tier, it means that we > could perform superfluous checks if one stage of ACLs has a higher max > tier than other stages. As an example, if ingress pre-load balancing > ACLs have a maximum tier of 1, and egress ACLs have a maximum tier of 2, > then it means that for all stages of ACLs, we will evaluate tiers 0, 1, > and 2 of ACLs, even though only one stage of ACLs uses tier 2. > > From a pure functionality standpoint, this doesn't cause any issues. > Even if we advance the tier past the highest configured value, it > results in a no-op and the same net result happens. > > However, the addition of sampling into ACLs has caused an unwanted side > effect. In the example scenario above, let's say the tier 1 ACL in the > ingress pre-load balancing stage evaluates to "pass". After the > evaluation, we send a sample for the "pass" result. We then advance > the tier to 2, then move back to ACL evaluation. There are no tier 2 > ACLs, so we move on to the sampling stage again. We then send a second > sample for the previous "pass" result from tier 1. The result is > confusing since we've sent two samples for the same ACL evaluation. > > To remedy this, we now track the max ACL tier in each of the stages > where ACLs are evaluated. Now there are no superfluous ACL evaluations > and no superfluous samples sent either. > > Reported-at: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FDP-760 > Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson <mmichels@redhat.com> > --- > Hi Mark, thank you for the patch. I'm not sure if this fixes the originally reported issue. For that issue we should generate generic sample flows that also match on tier. That should result in samples being generated for the appropriate tier. Either way we should have a test case to mimic the behavior described by the FDP-760. I have a few additional comments down below. northd/en-ls-stateful.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > northd/en-ls-stateful.h | 8 ++++++- > northd/northd.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > tests/ovn-northd.at | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/northd/en-ls-stateful.c b/northd/en-ls-stateful.c > index 44f74ea08..eb751d8dd 100644 > --- a/northd/en-ls-stateful.c > +++ b/northd/en-ls-stateful.c > @@ -204,16 +204,18 @@ ls_stateful_port_group_handler(struct engine_node > *node, void *data_) > ovn_datapaths_find_by_index(input_data.ls_datapaths, > ls_stateful_rec->ls_index); > bool had_stateful_acl = ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl; > - uint64_t max_acl_tier = ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier; > + struct acl_tier old_max = ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier; > bool had_acls = ls_stateful_rec->has_acls; > bool modified = false; > > ls_stateful_record_reinit(ls_stateful_rec, od, ls_pg, > input_data.ls_port_groups); > > + struct acl_tier new_max = ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier; > + > if ((had_stateful_acl != ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl) > || (had_acls != ls_stateful_rec->has_acls) > - || max_acl_tier != ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier) { > + || memcmp(&old_max, &new_max, sizeof(old_max))) { > We have to be very careful about padding if we want to use memcmp. Currently the struct is fine, but maybe we should mention it in the comment? > modified = true; > } > > @@ -365,7 +367,8 @@ ls_stateful_record_set_acl_flags(struct > ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > const struct ls_port_group_table *ls_pgs) > { > ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl = false; > - ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier = 0; > + memset(&ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier, 0, > + sizeof ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier); > ls_stateful_rec->has_acls = false; > > if (ls_stateful_record_set_acl_flags_(ls_stateful_rec, od->nbs->acls, > @@ -391,6 +394,36 @@ ls_stateful_record_set_acl_flags(struct > ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > } > } > > +static void > +update_ls_max_acl_tier(struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > + const struct nbrec_acl *acl) > +{ > + if (!acl->tier) { > + return; > + } > + > + if (!strcmp(acl->direction, "from-lport")) { > + if (smap_get_bool(&acl->options, "apply-after-lb", false)) { > + if (acl->tier > > ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_post_lb) { > + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_post_lb = acl->tier; > + } > We could use MAX(acl->tier, ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_post_lb) instead of the if statement, the same applies down below. > + } else if (acl->tier > > ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_pre_lb) { > + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_pre_lb = acl->tier; > + } > + } else if (acl->tier > ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.egress) { > + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.egress = acl->tier; > + } > +} > + > +static bool > +ls_acl_tiers_are_maxed_out(struct acl_tier *acl_tier, > + uint64_t max_allowed_acl_tier) > +{ > + return acl_tier->ingress_post_lb == max_allowed_acl_tier && > + acl_tier->ingress_pre_lb == max_allowed_acl_tier && > + acl_tier->egress == max_allowed_acl_tier; > +} > + > static bool > ls_stateful_record_set_acl_flags_(struct ls_stateful_record > *ls_stateful_rec, > struct nbrec_acl **acls, > @@ -408,16 +441,15 @@ ls_stateful_record_set_acl_flags_(struct > ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > ls_stateful_rec->has_acls = true; > for (size_t i = 0; i < n_acls; i++) { > const struct nbrec_acl *acl = acls[i]; > - if (acl->tier > ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier) { > - ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier = acl->tier; > - } > + update_ls_max_acl_tier(ls_stateful_rec, acl); > if (!ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl > && !strcmp(acl->action, "allow-related")) { > ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl = true; > } > if (ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl && > - ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier == > - nbrec_acl_col_tier.type.value.integer.max) { > + ls_acl_tiers_are_maxed_out( > + &ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier, > + nbrec_acl_col_tier.type.value.integer.max)) { > return true; > } > } > diff --git a/northd/en-ls-stateful.h b/northd/en-ls-stateful.h > index eae4b08e2..18a7398a6 100644 > --- a/northd/en-ls-stateful.h > +++ b/northd/en-ls-stateful.h > @@ -33,6 +33,12 @@ > > struct lflow_ref; > > +struct acl_tier { > + uint64_t ingress_pre_lb; > + uint64_t ingress_post_lb; > + uint64_t egress; > +}; > + > struct ls_stateful_record { > struct hmap_node key_node; > > @@ -46,7 +52,7 @@ struct ls_stateful_record { > bool has_stateful_acl; > bool has_lb_vip; > bool has_acls; > - uint64_t max_acl_tier; > + struct acl_tier max_acl_tier; > > /* 'lflow_ref' is used to reference logical flows generated for > * this ls_stateful record. > diff --git a/northd/northd.c b/northd/northd.c > index a267cd5f8..9d3edee32 100644 > --- a/northd/northd.c > +++ b/northd/northd.c > @@ -7321,28 +7321,34 @@ build_acl_action_lflows(const struct > ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > S_SWITCH_OUT_ACL_EVAL, > }; > > + uint64_t max_acl_tiers[] = { > + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_pre_lb, > + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_post_lb, > + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.egress, > + }; > + > ds_clear(actions); > ds_put_cstr(actions, REGBIT_ACL_VERDICT_ALLOW " = 0; " > REGBIT_ACL_VERDICT_DROP " = 0; " > REGBIT_ACL_VERDICT_REJECT " = 0; "); > - if (ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier) { > - ds_put_cstr(actions, REG_ACL_TIER " = 0; "); > - } > > size_t verdict_len = actions->length; > - > for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stages); i++) { > enum ovn_stage stage = stages[i]; > + if (max_acl_tiers[i]) { > + ds_put_cstr(actions, REG_ACL_TIER " = 0; "); > + } > + size_t verdict_tier_len = actions->length; > if (!ls_stateful_rec->has_acls) { > ovn_lflow_add(lflows, od, stage, 0, "1", "next;", lflow_ref); > continue; > } > - ds_truncate(actions, verdict_len); > + ds_truncate(actions, verdict_tier_len); > ds_put_cstr(actions, "next;"); > ovn_lflow_add(lflows, od, stage, 1000, > REGBIT_ACL_VERDICT_ALLOW " == 1", ds_cstr(actions), > lflow_ref); > - ds_truncate(actions, verdict_len); > + ds_truncate(actions, verdict_tier_len); > ds_put_cstr(actions, debug_implicit_drop_action()); > ovn_lflow_add(lflows, od, stage, 1000, > REGBIT_ACL_VERDICT_DROP " == 1", > @@ -7350,7 +7356,7 @@ build_acl_action_lflows(const struct > ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > lflow_ref); > bool ingress = ovn_stage_get_pipeline(stage) == P_IN; > > - ds_truncate(actions, verdict_len); > + ds_truncate(actions, verdict_tier_len); > build_acl_reject_action(actions, ingress); > > ovn_lflow_metered(lflows, od, stage, 1000, > @@ -7358,12 +7364,12 @@ build_acl_action_lflows(const struct > ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > copp_meter_get(COPP_REJECT, od->nbs->copp, > meter_groups), lflow_ref); > > - ds_truncate(actions, verdict_len); > + ds_truncate(actions, verdict_tier_len); > ds_put_cstr(actions, default_acl_action); > ovn_lflow_add(lflows, od, stage, 0, "1", ds_cstr(actions), > lflow_ref); > > struct ds tier_actions = DS_EMPTY_INITIALIZER; > - for (size_t j = 0; j < ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier; j++) { > + for (size_t j = 0; j < max_acl_tiers[i]; j++) { > ds_clear(match); > ds_put_format(match, REG_ACL_TIER " == %"PRIuSIZE, j); > ds_clear(&tier_actions); > @@ -7375,6 +7381,7 @@ build_acl_action_lflows(const struct > ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > ds_cstr(&tier_actions), lflow_ref); > } > ds_destroy(&tier_actions); > + ds_truncate(actions, verdict_len); > } > } > > @@ -7443,6 +7450,21 @@ build_acl_log_related_flows(const struct > ovn_datapath *od, > &acl->header_, lflow_ref); > } > > +static uint64_t > +choose_max_acl_tier(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > + const struct nbrec_acl *acl) > +{ > + if (!strcmp(acl->direction, "from-lport")) { > + if (smap_get_bool(&acl->options, "apply-after-lb", false)) { > + return ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_post_lb; > + } else { > + return ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_pre_lb; > + } > + } else { > + return ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.egress; > + } > +} > It would probably fit a separate patch, most the NAT related functions are parsing the type/stage over and over again. It would help to have an enum (maybe to repurpose enum acl_observation_stage) and do it only once in the loop. This could also lead to replacement of struct acl_tier with array. WDYT? > + > static void > build_acls(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > const struct ovn_datapath *od, > @@ -7639,8 +7661,9 @@ build_acls(const struct ls_stateful_record > *ls_stateful_rec, > build_acl_log_related_flows(od, lflows, acl, has_stateful, > meter_groups, &match, &actions, > lflow_ref); > + uint64_t max_acl_tier = choose_max_acl_tier(ls_stateful_rec, acl); > consider_acl(lflows, od, acl, has_stateful, > - meter_groups, ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier, > + meter_groups, max_acl_tier, > &match, &actions, lflow_ref); > build_acl_sample_flows(ls_stateful_rec, od, lflows, acl, > &match, &actions, sampling_apps, > @@ -7658,8 +7681,10 @@ build_acls(const struct ls_stateful_record > *ls_stateful_rec, > build_acl_log_related_flows(od, lflows, acl, has_stateful, > meter_groups, &match, > &actions, > lflow_ref); > + uint64_t max_acl_tier = > choose_max_acl_tier(ls_stateful_rec, > + acl); > consider_acl(lflows, od, acl, has_stateful, > - meter_groups, ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier, > + meter_groups, max_acl_tier, > &match, &actions, lflow_ref); > build_acl_sample_flows(ls_stateful_rec, od, lflows, acl, > &match, &actions, sampling_apps, > diff --git a/tests/ovn-northd.at b/tests/ovn-northd.at > index dcc3dbbc3..dd2ad2330 100644 > --- a/tests/ovn-northd.at > +++ b/tests/ovn-northd.at > @@ -13864,3 +13864,37 @@ check_no_redirect > > AT_CLEANUP > ]) > + > +OVN_FOR_EACH_NORTHD_NO_HV([ > +AT_SETUP([ACL mismatched tiers]) > +ovn_start > + > +check ovn-nbctl ls-add S1 > + > +# Ingress pre-lb ACLs have only a tier 1 ACL configured. > +# Ingress post-lb ACLs have tier up to 3 configured. > +# Egress ACLs have up to tier 2 configured. > +check ovn-nbctl --tier=1 acl-add S1 from-lport 1001 "tcp" allow > +check ovn-nbctl --tier=3 --apply-after-lb acl-add S1 from-lport 1001 > "tcp" allow > +check ovn-nbctl --tier=2 acl-add S1 to-lport 1001 "tcp" allow > + > +# Ingress pre-lb ACLs should only ever increment the tier to 1. > +AT_CHECK([ovn-sbctl lflow-list S1 | grep ls_in_acl_action | grep > priority=500 | ovn_strip_lflows], [0], [dnl > + table=??(ls_in_acl_action ), priority=500 , match=(reg8[[30..31]] == > 0), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 1; next(pipeline=ingress,table=??);) > +]) > + > +# Ingress post-lb ACLs should increment the tier to 3. > +AT_CHECK([ovn-sbctl lflow-list S1 | grep ls_in_acl_after_lb_action | grep > priority=500 | ovn_strip_lflows], [0], [dnl > + table=??(ls_in_acl_after_lb_action), priority=500 , > match=(reg8[[30..31]] == 0), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 1; > next(pipeline=ingress,table=??);) > + table=??(ls_in_acl_after_lb_action), priority=500 , > match=(reg8[[30..31]] == 1), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 2; > next(pipeline=ingress,table=??);) > + table=??(ls_in_acl_after_lb_action), priority=500 , > match=(reg8[[30..31]] == 2), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 3; > next(pipeline=ingress,table=??);) > +]) > + > +# Egress ACLs should increment the tier to 2. > +AT_CHECK([ovn-sbctl lflow-list S1 | grep ls_out_acl_action | grep > priority=500 | ovn_strip_lflows], [0], [dnl > + table=??(ls_out_acl_action ), priority=500 , match=(reg8[[30..31]] == > 0), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 1; next(pipeline=egress,table=??);) > + table=??(ls_out_acl_action ), priority=500 , match=(reg8[[30..31]] == > 1), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 2; next(pipeline=egress,table=??);) > +]) > + > +AT_CLEANUP > +]) > -- > 2.45.2 > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev > > Thanks, Ales
diff --git a/northd/en-ls-stateful.c b/northd/en-ls-stateful.c index 44f74ea08..eb751d8dd 100644 --- a/northd/en-ls-stateful.c +++ b/northd/en-ls-stateful.c @@ -204,16 +204,18 @@ ls_stateful_port_group_handler(struct engine_node *node, void *data_) ovn_datapaths_find_by_index(input_data.ls_datapaths, ls_stateful_rec->ls_index); bool had_stateful_acl = ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl; - uint64_t max_acl_tier = ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier; + struct acl_tier old_max = ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier; bool had_acls = ls_stateful_rec->has_acls; bool modified = false; ls_stateful_record_reinit(ls_stateful_rec, od, ls_pg, input_data.ls_port_groups); + struct acl_tier new_max = ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier; + if ((had_stateful_acl != ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl) || (had_acls != ls_stateful_rec->has_acls) - || max_acl_tier != ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier) { + || memcmp(&old_max, &new_max, sizeof(old_max))) { modified = true; } @@ -365,7 +367,8 @@ ls_stateful_record_set_acl_flags(struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, const struct ls_port_group_table *ls_pgs) { ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl = false; - ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier = 0; + memset(&ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier, 0, + sizeof ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier); ls_stateful_rec->has_acls = false; if (ls_stateful_record_set_acl_flags_(ls_stateful_rec, od->nbs->acls, @@ -391,6 +394,36 @@ ls_stateful_record_set_acl_flags(struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, } } +static void +update_ls_max_acl_tier(struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, + const struct nbrec_acl *acl) +{ + if (!acl->tier) { + return; + } + + if (!strcmp(acl->direction, "from-lport")) { + if (smap_get_bool(&acl->options, "apply-after-lb", false)) { + if (acl->tier > ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_post_lb) { + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_post_lb = acl->tier; + } + } else if (acl->tier > ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_pre_lb) { + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_pre_lb = acl->tier; + } + } else if (acl->tier > ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.egress) { + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.egress = acl->tier; + } +} + +static bool +ls_acl_tiers_are_maxed_out(struct acl_tier *acl_tier, + uint64_t max_allowed_acl_tier) +{ + return acl_tier->ingress_post_lb == max_allowed_acl_tier && + acl_tier->ingress_pre_lb == max_allowed_acl_tier && + acl_tier->egress == max_allowed_acl_tier; +} + static bool ls_stateful_record_set_acl_flags_(struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, struct nbrec_acl **acls, @@ -408,16 +441,15 @@ ls_stateful_record_set_acl_flags_(struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, ls_stateful_rec->has_acls = true; for (size_t i = 0; i < n_acls; i++) { const struct nbrec_acl *acl = acls[i]; - if (acl->tier > ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier) { - ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier = acl->tier; - } + update_ls_max_acl_tier(ls_stateful_rec, acl); if (!ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl && !strcmp(acl->action, "allow-related")) { ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl = true; } if (ls_stateful_rec->has_stateful_acl && - ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier == - nbrec_acl_col_tier.type.value.integer.max) { + ls_acl_tiers_are_maxed_out( + &ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier, + nbrec_acl_col_tier.type.value.integer.max)) { return true; } } diff --git a/northd/en-ls-stateful.h b/northd/en-ls-stateful.h index eae4b08e2..18a7398a6 100644 --- a/northd/en-ls-stateful.h +++ b/northd/en-ls-stateful.h @@ -33,6 +33,12 @@ struct lflow_ref; +struct acl_tier { + uint64_t ingress_pre_lb; + uint64_t ingress_post_lb; + uint64_t egress; +}; + struct ls_stateful_record { struct hmap_node key_node; @@ -46,7 +52,7 @@ struct ls_stateful_record { bool has_stateful_acl; bool has_lb_vip; bool has_acls; - uint64_t max_acl_tier; + struct acl_tier max_acl_tier; /* 'lflow_ref' is used to reference logical flows generated for * this ls_stateful record. diff --git a/northd/northd.c b/northd/northd.c index a267cd5f8..9d3edee32 100644 --- a/northd/northd.c +++ b/northd/northd.c @@ -7321,28 +7321,34 @@ build_acl_action_lflows(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, S_SWITCH_OUT_ACL_EVAL, }; + uint64_t max_acl_tiers[] = { + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_pre_lb, + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_post_lb, + ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.egress, + }; + ds_clear(actions); ds_put_cstr(actions, REGBIT_ACL_VERDICT_ALLOW " = 0; " REGBIT_ACL_VERDICT_DROP " = 0; " REGBIT_ACL_VERDICT_REJECT " = 0; "); - if (ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier) { - ds_put_cstr(actions, REG_ACL_TIER " = 0; "); - } size_t verdict_len = actions->length; - for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stages); i++) { enum ovn_stage stage = stages[i]; + if (max_acl_tiers[i]) { + ds_put_cstr(actions, REG_ACL_TIER " = 0; "); + } + size_t verdict_tier_len = actions->length; if (!ls_stateful_rec->has_acls) { ovn_lflow_add(lflows, od, stage, 0, "1", "next;", lflow_ref); continue; } - ds_truncate(actions, verdict_len); + ds_truncate(actions, verdict_tier_len); ds_put_cstr(actions, "next;"); ovn_lflow_add(lflows, od, stage, 1000, REGBIT_ACL_VERDICT_ALLOW " == 1", ds_cstr(actions), lflow_ref); - ds_truncate(actions, verdict_len); + ds_truncate(actions, verdict_tier_len); ds_put_cstr(actions, debug_implicit_drop_action()); ovn_lflow_add(lflows, od, stage, 1000, REGBIT_ACL_VERDICT_DROP " == 1", @@ -7350,7 +7356,7 @@ build_acl_action_lflows(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, lflow_ref); bool ingress = ovn_stage_get_pipeline(stage) == P_IN; - ds_truncate(actions, verdict_len); + ds_truncate(actions, verdict_tier_len); build_acl_reject_action(actions, ingress); ovn_lflow_metered(lflows, od, stage, 1000, @@ -7358,12 +7364,12 @@ build_acl_action_lflows(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, copp_meter_get(COPP_REJECT, od->nbs->copp, meter_groups), lflow_ref); - ds_truncate(actions, verdict_len); + ds_truncate(actions, verdict_tier_len); ds_put_cstr(actions, default_acl_action); ovn_lflow_add(lflows, od, stage, 0, "1", ds_cstr(actions), lflow_ref); struct ds tier_actions = DS_EMPTY_INITIALIZER; - for (size_t j = 0; j < ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier; j++) { + for (size_t j = 0; j < max_acl_tiers[i]; j++) { ds_clear(match); ds_put_format(match, REG_ACL_TIER " == %"PRIuSIZE, j); ds_clear(&tier_actions); @@ -7375,6 +7381,7 @@ build_acl_action_lflows(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, ds_cstr(&tier_actions), lflow_ref); } ds_destroy(&tier_actions); + ds_truncate(actions, verdict_len); } } @@ -7443,6 +7450,21 @@ build_acl_log_related_flows(const struct ovn_datapath *od, &acl->header_, lflow_ref); } +static uint64_t +choose_max_acl_tier(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, + const struct nbrec_acl *acl) +{ + if (!strcmp(acl->direction, "from-lport")) { + if (smap_get_bool(&acl->options, "apply-after-lb", false)) { + return ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_post_lb; + } else { + return ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.ingress_pre_lb; + } + } else { + return ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier.egress; + } +} + static void build_acls(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, const struct ovn_datapath *od, @@ -7639,8 +7661,9 @@ build_acls(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, build_acl_log_related_flows(od, lflows, acl, has_stateful, meter_groups, &match, &actions, lflow_ref); + uint64_t max_acl_tier = choose_max_acl_tier(ls_stateful_rec, acl); consider_acl(lflows, od, acl, has_stateful, - meter_groups, ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier, + meter_groups, max_acl_tier, &match, &actions, lflow_ref); build_acl_sample_flows(ls_stateful_rec, od, lflows, acl, &match, &actions, sampling_apps, @@ -7658,8 +7681,10 @@ build_acls(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, build_acl_log_related_flows(od, lflows, acl, has_stateful, meter_groups, &match, &actions, lflow_ref); + uint64_t max_acl_tier = choose_max_acl_tier(ls_stateful_rec, + acl); consider_acl(lflows, od, acl, has_stateful, - meter_groups, ls_stateful_rec->max_acl_tier, + meter_groups, max_acl_tier, &match, &actions, lflow_ref); build_acl_sample_flows(ls_stateful_rec, od, lflows, acl, &match, &actions, sampling_apps, diff --git a/tests/ovn-northd.at b/tests/ovn-northd.at index dcc3dbbc3..dd2ad2330 100644 --- a/tests/ovn-northd.at +++ b/tests/ovn-northd.at @@ -13864,3 +13864,37 @@ check_no_redirect AT_CLEANUP ]) + +OVN_FOR_EACH_NORTHD_NO_HV([ +AT_SETUP([ACL mismatched tiers]) +ovn_start + +check ovn-nbctl ls-add S1 + +# Ingress pre-lb ACLs have only a tier 1 ACL configured. +# Ingress post-lb ACLs have tier up to 3 configured. +# Egress ACLs have up to tier 2 configured. +check ovn-nbctl --tier=1 acl-add S1 from-lport 1001 "tcp" allow +check ovn-nbctl --tier=3 --apply-after-lb acl-add S1 from-lport 1001 "tcp" allow +check ovn-nbctl --tier=2 acl-add S1 to-lport 1001 "tcp" allow + +# Ingress pre-lb ACLs should only ever increment the tier to 1. +AT_CHECK([ovn-sbctl lflow-list S1 | grep ls_in_acl_action | grep priority=500 | ovn_strip_lflows], [0], [dnl + table=??(ls_in_acl_action ), priority=500 , match=(reg8[[30..31]] == 0), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 1; next(pipeline=ingress,table=??);) +]) + +# Ingress post-lb ACLs should increment the tier to 3. +AT_CHECK([ovn-sbctl lflow-list S1 | grep ls_in_acl_after_lb_action | grep priority=500 | ovn_strip_lflows], [0], [dnl + table=??(ls_in_acl_after_lb_action), priority=500 , match=(reg8[[30..31]] == 0), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 1; next(pipeline=ingress,table=??);) + table=??(ls_in_acl_after_lb_action), priority=500 , match=(reg8[[30..31]] == 1), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 2; next(pipeline=ingress,table=??);) + table=??(ls_in_acl_after_lb_action), priority=500 , match=(reg8[[30..31]] == 2), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 3; next(pipeline=ingress,table=??);) +]) + +# Egress ACLs should increment the tier to 2. +AT_CHECK([ovn-sbctl lflow-list S1 | grep ls_out_acl_action | grep priority=500 | ovn_strip_lflows], [0], [dnl + table=??(ls_out_acl_action ), priority=500 , match=(reg8[[30..31]] == 0), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 1; next(pipeline=egress,table=??);) + table=??(ls_out_acl_action ), priority=500 , match=(reg8[[30..31]] == 1), action=(reg8[[30..31]] = 2; next(pipeline=egress,table=??);) +]) + +AT_CLEANUP +])
When ACL tiers were introduced, the code kept track of the highest ACL tier so that when iterating through ACL tiers, we would not attempt to advance the current tier past the highest configured tier. Unfortunately, keeping track of a single max ACL tier doesn't work when ACLs are evaluated in three separate places. ACLs can be evaluated on ingress before load balancing, on ingress after load balancing, and on egress. By only keeping track of a single max ACL tier, it means that we could perform superfluous checks if one stage of ACLs has a higher max tier than other stages. As an example, if ingress pre-load balancing ACLs have a maximum tier of 1, and egress ACLs have a maximum tier of 2, then it means that for all stages of ACLs, we will evaluate tiers 0, 1, and 2 of ACLs, even though only one stage of ACLs uses tier 2. From a pure functionality standpoint, this doesn't cause any issues. Even if we advance the tier past the highest configured value, it results in a no-op and the same net result happens. However, the addition of sampling into ACLs has caused an unwanted side effect. In the example scenario above, let's say the tier 1 ACL in the ingress pre-load balancing stage evaluates to "pass". After the evaluation, we send a sample for the "pass" result. We then advance the tier to 2, then move back to ACL evaluation. There are no tier 2 ACLs, so we move on to the sampling stage again. We then send a second sample for the previous "pass" result from tier 1. The result is confusing since we've sent two samples for the same ACL evaluation. To remedy this, we now track the max ACL tier in each of the stages where ACLs are evaluated. Now there are no superfluous ACL evaluations and no superfluous samples sent either. Reported-at: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FDP-760 Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson <mmichels@redhat.com> --- northd/en-ls-stateful.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- northd/en-ls-stateful.h | 8 ++++++- northd/northd.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- tests/ovn-northd.at | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)