Message ID | 20240909-ep93xx-v12-0-e86ab2423d4b@maquefel.me |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ep93xx device tree conversion | expand |
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 11:12 AM Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay <devnull+nikita.shubin.maquefel.me@kernel.org> wrote: > > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to merge it via Arnd branch. > > It was decided from the very beginning of these series, mostly because > it's a full conversion of platform code to DT and it seemed not > convenient to maintain compatibility with both platform and DT. > > Following patches require attention from Stephen Boyd or clk subsystem: Does it mean you still have a few patches without tags? What are their respective numbers? > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx: > - tristate > - drop MFD_SYSCON/REGMAP > - add AUXILIARY_BUS/REGMAP_MMIO > - prefixed all static with ep9xx_ > - s/clk_hw_register_ddiv()/ep93xx_clk_register_ddiv()/ > - s/clk_register_div()/ep93xx_clk_register_div()/ > - dropped devm_ep93xx_clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_parent_data macro > - s/devm_ep93xx_clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_parent_data()/devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_parent_data()/
Hi Andy! On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 11:49 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 11:12 AM Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay > <devnull+nikita.shubin.maquefel.me@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to merge it > > via Arnd branch. > > > > It was decided from the very beginning of these series, mostly > > because > > it's a full conversion of platform code to DT and it seemed not > > convenient to maintain compatibility with both platform and DT. > > > > Following patches require attention from Stephen Boyd or clk > > subsystem: > > Does it mean you still have a few patches without tags? > What are their respective numbers? The clk is the last one as i think, all others can be ACKed by Alexander or by Arnd himself. > > > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx: > > - tristate > > - drop MFD_SYSCON/REGMAP > > - add AUXILIARY_BUS/REGMAP_MMIO > > - prefixed all static with ep9xx_ > > - s/clk_hw_register_ddiv()/ep93xx_clk_register_ddiv()/ > > - s/clk_register_div()/ep93xx_clk_register_div()/ > > - dropped devm_ep93xx_clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_parent_data > > macro > > - > > s/devm_ep93xx_clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_parent_data()/devm_clk_hw_ > > register_fixed_rate_parent_data()/ >
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024, at 09:02, Nikita Shubin wrote: > On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 11:49 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 11:12 AM Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay >> <devnull+nikita.shubin.maquefel.me@kernel.org> wrote: >> > >> > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to merge it >> > via Arnd branch. >> > >> > It was decided from the very beginning of these series, mostly >> > because >> > it's a full conversion of platform code to DT and it seemed not >> > convenient to maintain compatibility with both platform and DT. >> > >> > Following patches require attention from Stephen Boyd or clk >> > subsystem: >> >> Does it mean you still have a few patches without tags? >> What are their respective numbers? > > The clk is the last one as i think, all others can be ACKed by > Alexander or by Arnd himself. I've merged the series into the for-next branch of the arm-soc tree now. The timing isn't great as I was still waiting for that final Ack, but it seem better to have it done than to keep respinning the series. I won't send it with the initial pull requests this week but hope to send this one once I get beck from LPC, provided there are no surprises that require a rebase. Arnd
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 6:13 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024, at 09:02, Nikita Shubin wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 11:49 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 11:12 AM Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay > >> <devnull+nikita.shubin.maquefel.me@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to merge it > >> > via Arnd branch. > >> > > >> > It was decided from the very beginning of these series, mostly > >> > because > >> > it's a full conversion of platform code to DT and it seemed not > >> > convenient to maintain compatibility with both platform and DT. > >> > > >> > Following patches require attention from Stephen Boyd or clk > >> > subsystem: > >> > >> Does it mean you still have a few patches without tags? > >> What are their respective numbers? > > > > The clk is the last one as i think, all others can be ACKed by > > Alexander or by Arnd himself. > > I've merged the series into the for-next branch of the arm-soc > tree now. The timing isn't great as I was still waiting for > that final Ack, but it seem better to have it done than to keep > respinning the series. > > I won't send it with the initial pull requests this week > but hope to send this one once I get beck from LPC, provided > there are no surprises that require a rebase. Thank you! This, in particular, will move forward to the GPIO descriptor and getting rid of old legacy GPIO APIs.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 5:13 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > I've merged the series into the for-next branch of the arm-soc > tree now. The timing isn't great as I was still waiting for > that final Ack, but it seem better to have it done than to keep > respinning the series. > > I won't send it with the initial pull requests this week > but hope to send this one once I get beck from LPC, provided > there are no surprises that require a rebase. Thanks for picking it up! This is a long awaited patch set. Yours, Linus Walleij