diff mbox series

rs6000, Fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

Message ID 7d0c7283-1a62-4c19-b5a1-43e09ab38af9@linux.ibm.com
State New
Headers show
Series rs6000, Fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c | expand

Commit Message

Carl Love Sept. 19, 2024, 11:40 p.m. UTC
GCC maintainers:

This patch removes an expected value change that was made to verify the 
error checking for the test was working.  Apparently, it didn't get 
removed from the final patch.

The patch fixes the single test error in the builtins-1-10-runnable.c test.

The patch was run on a Power 10.

Please let me know if the patch is acceptable for mainline.  Thanks.

                          Carl Love

-----------------------------------------------------------------
rs6000, Fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

The first element of the expected result was apparently changed
for testing purposes.  The change didn't get removed before the
commit.

The issue was introduced in commit:

   commit f1ad419ebfdcfaf26117e069b10bd1b154276049
   Author: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
   Date:   Fri Sep 4 19:24:22 2020 -0500

       rs6000, vector integer multiply/divide/modulo instructions

Remove the test input.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

     * gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c: Remove
     expected value for testing.  Uncomment correct    expected
     result.
---
  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Carl Love Sept. 19, 2024, 11:48 p.m. UTC | #1
GCC maintainers:

Please ignore this patch.  Attached the wrong patch to the message.   
Sorry for the noise.

                      Carl


On 9/19/24 4:40 PM, Carl Love wrote:
> GCC maintainers:
>
> This patch removes an expected value change that was made to verify 
> the error checking for the test was working.  Apparently, it didn't 
> get removed from the final patch.
>
> The patch fixes the single test error in the builtins-1-10-runnable.c 
> test.
>
> The patch was run on a Power 10.
>
> Please let me know if the patch is acceptable for mainline. Thanks.
>
>                          Carl Love
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> rs6000, Fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
>
> The first element of the expected result was apparently changed
> for testing purposes.  The change didn't get removed before the
> commit.
>
> The issue was introduced in commit:
>
>   commit f1ad419ebfdcfaf26117e069b10bd1b154276049
>   Author: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
>   Date:   Fri Sep 4 19:24:22 2020 -0500
>
>       rs6000, vector integer multiply/divide/modulo instructions
>
> Remove the test input.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>     * gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c: Remove
>     expected value for testing.  Uncomment correct    expected
>     result.
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git 
> a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
> index 222c8b3a409..5402852f82b 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
> @@ -281,8 +281,7 @@ int main()
>      /* Signed word multiply high */
>      i_arg1 = (vector int){ 2147483648, 2147483648, 2147483648, 
> 2147483648 };
>      i_arg2 = (vector int){ 2, 3, 4, 5};
> -    //    vec_i_expected = (vector int){-1, -2, -2, -3};
> -    vec_i_expected = (vector int){1, -2, -2, -3};
> +    vec_i_expected = (vector int){-1, -2, -2, -3};
>
>      vec_i_result = vec_mulh (i_arg1, i_arg2);
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
index 222c8b3a409..5402852f82b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
@@ -281,8 +281,7 @@  int main()
      /* Signed word multiply high */
      i_arg1 = (vector int){ 2147483648, 2147483648, 2147483648, 
2147483648 };
      i_arg2 = (vector int){ 2, 3, 4, 5};
-    //    vec_i_expected = (vector int){-1, -2, -2, -3};
-    vec_i_expected = (vector int){1, -2, -2, -3};
+    vec_i_expected = (vector int){-1, -2, -2, -3};

      vec_i_result = vec_mulh (i_arg1, i_arg2);