Message ID | 01020191e0d5e45f-9128c7af-14e2-4e73-9f0d-2265af9c6c54-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | c++: Don't ICE to build private access error message [PR116323] | expand |
On 9/11/24 7:26 AM, Simon Martin wrote: > We currently ICE upon the following code while building the "[...] is > private within this context" error message > > === cut here === > class A { enum Enum{}; }; > template<typename E, template<typename> class Alloc> > class B : private Alloc<E>, private A {}; > template<typename E, template<typename> class Alloc> > int B<E, Alloc>::foo (Enum m) { return 42; } > === cut here === > > The problem is that since r11-6880, after detecting that Enum cannot be > accessed in B, enforce_access will access the TYPE_BINFO of all the > bases of B, which ICEs for any that is a BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM. > This patch simply skips such bases. > > Successfully tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > PR c++/116323 > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * search.cc (get_parent_with_private_access): Only call access_in_type > for RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P base BINFOs. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/template/access43.C: New test. > > --- > gcc/cp/search.cc | 4 +++- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access43.C | 11 +++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access43.C > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/search.cc b/gcc/cp/search.cc > index 60c30ecb881..a810cf70d6a 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/search.cc > +++ b/gcc/cp/search.cc > @@ -163,9 +163,11 @@ get_parent_with_private_access (tree decl, tree binfo) > /* Iterate through immediate parent classes. */ > for (int i = 0; BINFO_BASE_ITERATE (binfo, i, base_binfo); i++) > { > + tree base_binfo_type = BINFO_TYPE (base_binfo); > /* This parent had private access. Therefore that's why BINFO can't > access DECL. */ > - if (access_in_type (BINFO_TYPE (base_binfo), decl) == ak_private) > + if (RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (base_binfo_type) You might add to the comment to explain that in a template the base list can also contain WILDCARD_TYPE_P types. OK either way. Jason
On 11 Sep 2024, at 20:57, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 9/11/24 7:26 AM, Simon Martin wrote: >> We currently ICE upon the following code while building the "[...] is >> private within this context" error message >> >> === cut here === >> class A { enum Enum{}; }; >> template<typename E, template<typename> class Alloc> >> class B : private Alloc<E>, private A {}; >> template<typename E, template<typename> class Alloc> >> int B<E, Alloc>::foo (Enum m) { return 42; } >> === cut here === >> >> The problem is that since r11-6880, after detecting that Enum cannot >> be >> accessed in B, enforce_access will access the TYPE_BINFO of all the >> bases of B, which ICEs for any that is a >> BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM. >> This patch simply skips such bases. >> >> Successfully tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. >> >> PR c++/116323 >> >> gcc/cp/ChangeLog: >> >> * search.cc (get_parent_with_private_access): Only call >> access_in_type >> for RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P base BINFOs. >> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >> >> * g++.dg/template/access43.C: New test. >> >> --- >> gcc/cp/search.cc | 4 +++- >> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access43.C | 11 +++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access43.C >> >> diff --git a/gcc/cp/search.cc b/gcc/cp/search.cc >> index 60c30ecb881..a810cf70d6a 100644 >> --- a/gcc/cp/search.cc >> +++ b/gcc/cp/search.cc >> @@ -163,9 +163,11 @@ get_parent_with_private_access (tree decl, tree >> binfo) >> /* Iterate through immediate parent classes. */ >> for (int i = 0; BINFO_BASE_ITERATE (binfo, i, base_binfo); i++) >> { >> + tree base_binfo_type = BINFO_TYPE (base_binfo); >> /* This parent had private access. Therefore that's why >> BINFO can't >> access DECL. */ >> - if (access_in_type (BINFO_TYPE (base_binfo), decl) == >> ak_private) >> + if (RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (base_binfo_type) > > You might add to the comment to explain that in a template the base > list can also contain WILDCARD_TYPE_P types. OK either way. Thanks Jason. Pushed with the suggested extra comment as r15-3598. Simon
diff --git a/gcc/cp/search.cc b/gcc/cp/search.cc index 60c30ecb881..a810cf70d6a 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/search.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/search.cc @@ -163,9 +163,11 @@ get_parent_with_private_access (tree decl, tree binfo) /* Iterate through immediate parent classes. */ for (int i = 0; BINFO_BASE_ITERATE (binfo, i, base_binfo); i++) { + tree base_binfo_type = BINFO_TYPE (base_binfo); /* This parent had private access. Therefore that's why BINFO can't access DECL. */ - if (access_in_type (BINFO_TYPE (base_binfo), decl) == ak_private) + if (RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (base_binfo_type) + && access_in_type (base_binfo_type, decl) == ak_private) return base_binfo; } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access43.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access43.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ce9e6c8fbb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access43.C @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +// PR c++/116323 +// { dg-do "compile" } +// { dg-additional-options "-Wno-template-body" } + +class A { enum Enum{}; }; + +template<typename E, template<typename> class Alloc> +class B : private Alloc<E>, private A {}; + +template<typename E, template<typename> class Alloc> +int B<E, Alloc>::foo (Enum m) { return 42; } // { dg-error "is private" }