mbox series

[v2,0/6] Add initial Exynos850 support to the thermal driver

Message ID 20240726110114.1509733-1-m.majewski2@samsung.com
Headers show
Series Add initial Exynos850 support to the thermal driver | expand

Message

Mateusz Majewski July 26, 2024, 11:01 a.m. UTC
This series adds initial Exynos850 support to the thermal driver
together with its requirements (sanitize_temp_error fix, adding the new
string to dt-bindings), while also cleaning up a bit (improving power
management support and removing some outdated information from
dt-bindings).

Changelog:
 v2:
   - Reimplemented to use the Exynos850 TMU clock: removed the patch to
     make the clock optional and changed dt-bindings change accordingly
   - Improved the Exynos850 implementation itself (style and one correct
     register offset)
   - Removed conditional compilation in favor of pm_sleep_ptr
   - Shortened dt-bindings description

Mateusz Majewski (6):
  drivers/thermal/exynos: use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
  drivers/thermal/exynos: use pm_sleep_ptr instead of conditional
    compilation
  drivers/thermal/exynos: improve sanitize_temp_error
  dt-bindings: thermal: samsung,exynos: add exynos850-tmu string
  drivers/thermal/exynos: add initial Exynos850 support
  dt-bindings: thermal: samsung,exynos: remove outdated information on
    trip point count

 .../thermal/samsung,exynos-thermal.yaml       |   8 +-
 drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c          | 219 ++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Comments

Mateusz Majewski July 26, 2024, 3:03 p.m. UTC | #1
Forgot to mention it in the cover letter, but as discussed in v1 in
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAPLW+4nfEjP4FDjRJORyyKk46x4VfFAcMuK88jXUT_LJoP1N_g@mail.gmail.com,
this requires support for the TMU clock to run, available in
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240723163311.28654-2-semen.protsenko@linaro.org.
This series builds fine without this, only it is not possible to write a
devicetree source for this without the mentioned series, so as I
understand it is ok for this to be in review anyway?

By the way, I am going to have some more time to help with the upstream
kernel, and have access to most of the supported SoCs. If you feel that
it is appropriate, I would be very happy to become one of the
maintainers of this driver :)
Krzysztof Kozlowski July 26, 2024, 3:08 p.m. UTC | #2
On 26/07/2024 17:03, Mateusz Majewski wrote:
> Forgot to mention it in the cover letter, but as discussed in v1 in
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAPLW+4nfEjP4FDjRJORyyKk46x4VfFAcMuK88jXUT_LJoP1N_g@mail.gmail.com,
> this requires support for the TMU clock to run, available in
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240723163311.28654-2-semen.protsenko@linaro.org.
> This series builds fine without this, only it is not possible to write a
> devicetree source for this without the mentioned series, so as I
> understand it is ok for this to be in review anyway?

It's okay. Also okay for merging via thermal tree, after merge window.
Only DTS will depend on the clock binding patch, which you will have to
mention in cover letter or patch changelog (---).

> 
> By the way, I am going to have some more time to help with the upstream
> kernel, and have access to most of the supported SoCs. If you feel that
> it is appropriate, I would be very happy to become one of the
> maintainers of this driver :)

If you have time, I think it would be great. +1

Reviews, tests, cleanups and any other non-developer activities are
welcomed anyway, regardless whether you are listed as maintainer or not.
Just set yourself a lei filter for specific keywords (e.g. samsung-soc
list or dfn: for paths) and just review all the code on the lists.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Sam Protsenko July 26, 2024, 6:08 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:01 AM Mateusz Majewski
<m.majewski2@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Slightly simpler and nothing is lost if _suspend and _resume functions
> are built unconditionally.
>
> Suggested-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@samsung.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>

>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 9b7ca93a72f1..b68e9755c933 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -1132,7 +1132,6 @@ static void exynos_tmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 clk_unprepare(data->clk_sec);
>  }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  static int exynos_tmu_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         exynos_tmu_control(to_platform_device(dev), false);
> @@ -1152,15 +1151,11 @@ static int exynos_tmu_resume(struct device *dev)
>
>  static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(exynos_tmu_pm,
>                                 exynos_tmu_suspend, exynos_tmu_resume);
> -#define EXYNOS_TMU_PM  (&exynos_tmu_pm)
> -#else
> -#define EXYNOS_TMU_PM  NULL
> -#endif
>
>  static struct platform_driver exynos_tmu_driver = {
>         .driver = {
>                 .name   = "exynos-tmu",
> -               .pm     = EXYNOS_TMU_PM,
> +               .pm     = pm_sleep_ptr(&exynos_tmu_pm),
>                 .of_match_table = exynos_tmu_match,
>         },
>         .probe = exynos_tmu_probe,
> --
> 2.45.1
>
Sam Protsenko July 26, 2024, 6:27 p.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:01 AM Mateusz Majewski
<m.majewski2@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> There are two minor issues regarding this function.
>
> One is that it attempts to calculate the second calibration value even
> if 1-point trimming is being used; in this case, the calculated value is
> probably not useful and is never used anyway. Changing this also
> requires a minor reordering in Exynos5433 initialization function, so
> that we know which type of trimming is used before we call
> sanitize_temp_error.
>
> The second issue is that the function is not very consistent when it
> comes to the use of Exynos7-specific parameters. This seems to not be an
> issue in practice, in part because some of these issues are related to
> the mentioned calculation of the second calibration value. However,
> fixing this makes the code a bit less confusing, and will be required
> for Exynos850 which has 9-bit temperature values and uses 2-point
> trimming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@samsung.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>

> v1 -> v2: reworked to change shift instead of only mask and to also fix
>   the 2-point trimming issue.
>
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index b68e9755c933..087a09628e23 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@
>  #define EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON               0x160
>
>  #define EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_MASK                  0x1ff
> +#define EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_SHIFT                 9
>  #define EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT                        23
>  #define EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT          0
>  #define EXYNOS7_EMUL_DATA_SHIFT                        7
> @@ -234,20 +235,23 @@ static void sanitize_temp_error(struct exynos_tmu_data *data, u32 trim_info)
>         u16 tmu_temp_mask =
>                 (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) ? EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_MASK
>                                                 : EXYNOS_TMU_TEMP_MASK;
> +       int tmu_85_shift =
> +               (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) ? EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_SHIFT
> +                                               : EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_85_SHIFT;
>
>         data->temp_error1 = trim_info & tmu_temp_mask;
> -       data->temp_error2 = ((trim_info >> EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_85_SHIFT) &
> -                               EXYNOS_TMU_TEMP_MASK);
> -
>         if (!data->temp_error1 ||
>             (data->min_efuse_value > data->temp_error1) ||
>             (data->temp_error1 > data->max_efuse_value))
> -               data->temp_error1 = data->efuse_value & EXYNOS_TMU_TEMP_MASK;
> +               data->temp_error1 = data->efuse_value & tmu_temp_mask;
>
> -       if (!data->temp_error2)
> -               data->temp_error2 =
> -                       (data->efuse_value >> EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_85_SHIFT) &
> -                       EXYNOS_TMU_TEMP_MASK;
> +       if (data->cal_type == TYPE_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING) {
> +               data->temp_error2 = (trim_info >> tmu_85_shift) & tmu_temp_mask;
> +               if (!data->temp_error2)
> +                       data->temp_error2 =
> +                               (data->efuse_value >> tmu_85_shift) &
> +                               tmu_temp_mask;
> +       }
>  }
>
>  static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -510,7 +514,6 @@ static void exynos5433_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         int sensor_id, cal_type;
>
>         trim_info = readl(data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_TRIMINFO);
> -       sanitize_temp_error(data, trim_info);
>
>         /* Read the temperature sensor id */
>         sensor_id = (trim_info & EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_MASK)
> @@ -532,6 +535,8 @@ static void exynos5433_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 break;
>         }
>
> +       sanitize_temp_error(data, trim_info);
> +
>         dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Calibration type is %d-point calibration\n",
>                         cal_type ?  2 : 1);
>  }
> --
> 2.45.1
>
Sam Protsenko July 26, 2024, 6:44 p.m. UTC | #5
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:01 AM Mateusz Majewski
<m.majewski2@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> This is loosely adapted from an implementation available at
> https://gitlab.com/Linaro/96boards/e850-96/kernel/-/blob/android-exynos-4.14-linaro/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> Some differences from that implementation:
> - unlike that implementation, we do not use the ACPM mechanism, instead
>   we just access the registers, like we do for other SoCs,
> - the SoC is supposed to support multiple sensors inside one unit. The
>   vendor implementation uses one kernel device per sensor, we would
>   probably prefer to have one device for all sensors, have
>   #thermal-sensor-cells = <1> and so on. We implemented this, but we
>   could not get the extra sensors to work on our hardware so far. This
>   might be due to a misconfiguration and we will probably come back to
>   this, however our implementation only supports a single sensor for
>   now,
> - the vendor implementation supports disabling CPU cores as a cooling
>   device. We did not attempt to port this, and this would not really fit
>   this driver anyway.
>
> Additionally, some differences from the other SoCs supported by this
> driver:
> - we do not really constrain the e-fuse information like the other SoCs
>   do (data->{min,max}_efuse_value). In our tests, those values (as well
>   as the raw sensor values) were much higher than in the other SoCs, to
>   the degree that reusing the data->{min,max}_efuse_value from the other
>   SoCs would cause instant critical temperature reset on boot,
> - this SoC provides more information in the e-fuse data than other SoCs,
>   so we read some values inside exynos850_tmu_initialize instead of
>   hardcoding them in exynos_map_dt_data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@samsung.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>

> v1 -> v2: rename and reorder some registers, use the correct register
>   offset for EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_AVG_CON, make the clock required,
>   additionally do some minor style changes.
>
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 191 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 182 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 087a09628e23..2618a81fca53 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,41 @@
>  #define EXYNOS7_EMUL_DATA_SHIFT                        7
>  #define EXYNOS7_EMUL_DATA_MASK                 0x1ff
>
> +/* Exynos850 specific registers */
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_CURRENT_TEMP0_1      0x40
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_THD_TEMP0_RISE       0x50
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_THD_TEMP0_FALL       0x60
> +
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIMINFO_SHIFT           4
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIMINFO_OFFSET(n) \
> +       (EXYNOS_TMU_REG_TRIMINFO + (n) * EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIMINFO_SHIFT)
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_T_TRIM0_SHIFT            18
> +
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_CONTROL1             0x24
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_LPI_MODE_MASK            1
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_LPI_MODE_SHIFT           10
> +
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_COUNTER_VALUE0       0x30
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_EN_TEMP_SEN_OFF_MASK     0xffff
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_EN_TEMP_SEN_OFF_SHIFT    0
> +
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_COUNTER_VALUE1       0x34
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_CLK_SENSE_ON_MASK                0xffff
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_CLK_SENSE_ON_SHIFT       16
> +
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_AVG_CON              0x38
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_AVG_MODE_MASK            0x7
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_DEM_ENABLE               BIT(4)
> +
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_TRIM0                        0x3c
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIM0_MASK               0xf
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_VBEI_TRIM_SHIFT          8
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_VREF_TRIM_SHIFT          12
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_BGRI_TRIM_SHIFT          20
> +
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_TEM1051X_SENSE_VALUE     0x028a
> +#define EXYNOS850_TMU_TEM1456X_SENSE_VALUE     0x0a28
> +
>  #define EXYNOS_FIRST_POINT_TRIM                        25
>  #define EXYNOS_SECOND_POINT_TRIM               85
>
> @@ -134,6 +169,7 @@ enum soc_type {
>         SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420_TRIMINFO,
>         SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433,
>         SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7,
> +       SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS850,
>  };
>
>  /**
> @@ -232,12 +268,14 @@ static int code_to_temp(struct exynos_tmu_data *data, u16 temp_code)
>
>  static void sanitize_temp_error(struct exynos_tmu_data *data, u32 trim_info)
>  {
> -       u16 tmu_temp_mask =
> -               (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) ? EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_MASK
> -                                               : EXYNOS_TMU_TEMP_MASK;
> -       int tmu_85_shift =
> -               (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) ? EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_SHIFT
> -                                               : EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_85_SHIFT;
> +       u16 tmu_temp_mask = (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7 ||
> +                            data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS850) ?
> +                                   EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_MASK :
> +                                   EXYNOS_TMU_TEMP_MASK;
> +       int tmu_85_shift = (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7 ||
> +                           data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS850) ?
> +                                  EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_SHIFT :
> +                                  EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_85_SHIFT;
>
>         data->temp_error1 = trim_info & tmu_temp_mask;
>         if (!data->temp_error1 ||
> @@ -587,6 +625,114 @@ static void exynos7_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         sanitize_temp_error(data, trim_info);
>  }
>
> +static void exynos850_tmu_set_low_temp(struct exynos_tmu_data *data, u8 temp)
> +{
> +       exynos_tmu_update_temp(data, EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_THD_TEMP0_FALL + 12, 0,
> +                              temp);
> +       exynos_tmu_update_bit(data, EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTEN,
> +                             EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_FALL0_SHIFT + 0, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos850_tmu_set_high_temp(struct exynos_tmu_data *data, u8 temp)
> +{
> +       exynos_tmu_update_temp(data, EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_THD_TEMP0_RISE + 12, 16,
> +                              temp);
> +       exynos_tmu_update_bit(data, EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTEN,
> +                             EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT + 1, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos850_tmu_disable_low(struct exynos_tmu_data *data)
> +{
> +       exynos_tmu_update_bit(data, EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTEN,
> +                             EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_FALL0_SHIFT + 0, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos850_tmu_disable_high(struct exynos_tmu_data *data)
> +{
> +       exynos_tmu_update_bit(data, EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTEN,
> +                             EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT + 1, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos850_tmu_set_crit_temp(struct exynos_tmu_data *data, u8 temp)
> +{
> +       exynos_tmu_update_temp(data, EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_THD_TEMP0_RISE + 0, 16,
> +                              temp);
> +       exynos_tmu_update_bit(data, EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL,
> +                             EXYNOS_TMU_THERM_TRIP_EN_SHIFT, true);
> +       exynos_tmu_update_bit(data, EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTEN,
> +                             EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT + 7, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos850_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +       u32 cal_type, avg_mode, reg, bgri, vref, vbei;
> +
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIMINFO_OFFSET(0));
> +       cal_type = (reg & EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_CALIB_SEL_MASK) >>
> +                  EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_CALIB_SEL_SHIFT;
> +       data->reference_voltage = (reg >> EXYNOS850_TMU_T_TRIM0_SHIFT) &
> +                                 EXYNOS_TMU_REF_VOLTAGE_MASK;
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIMINFO_OFFSET(1));
> +       data->gain = (reg >> EXYNOS850_TMU_T_TRIM0_SHIFT) &
> +                    EXYNOS_TMU_BUF_SLOPE_SEL_MASK;
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIMINFO_OFFSET(2));
> +       avg_mode = (reg >> EXYNOS850_TMU_T_TRIM0_SHIFT) &
> +                  EXYNOS850_TMU_AVG_MODE_MASK;
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIMINFO_OFFSET(3));
> +       bgri = (reg >> EXYNOS850_TMU_T_TRIM0_SHIFT) & EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIM0_MASK;
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIMINFO_OFFSET(4));
> +       vref = (reg >> EXYNOS850_TMU_T_TRIM0_SHIFT) & EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIM0_MASK;
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIMINFO_OFFSET(5));
> +       vbei = (reg >> EXYNOS850_TMU_T_TRIM0_SHIFT) & EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIM0_MASK;
> +
> +       data->cal_type = cal_type == EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING ?
> +                                TYPE_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING :
> +                                TYPE_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING;
> +
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIMINFO_OFFSET(0));
> +       sanitize_temp_error(data, reg);
> +
> +       dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Calibration type is %d-point calibration\n",
> +                cal_type ? 2 : 1);
> +
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_AVG_CON);
> +       reg &= ~EXYNOS850_TMU_AVG_MODE_MASK;
> +       reg &= ~EXYNOS850_TMU_DEM_ENABLE;
> +       if (avg_mode) {
> +               reg |= avg_mode;
> +               reg |= EXYNOS850_TMU_DEM_ENABLE;
> +       }
> +       writel(reg, data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_AVG_CON);
> +
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_COUNTER_VALUE0);
> +       reg &= ~(EXYNOS850_TMU_EN_TEMP_SEN_OFF_MASK
> +                << EXYNOS850_TMU_EN_TEMP_SEN_OFF_SHIFT);
> +       reg |= EXYNOS850_TMU_TEM1051X_SENSE_VALUE
> +              << EXYNOS850_TMU_EN_TEMP_SEN_OFF_SHIFT;
> +       writel(reg, data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_COUNTER_VALUE0);
> +
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_COUNTER_VALUE1);
> +       reg &= ~(EXYNOS850_TMU_CLK_SENSE_ON_MASK
> +                << EXYNOS850_TMU_CLK_SENSE_ON_SHIFT);
> +       reg |= EXYNOS850_TMU_TEM1051X_SENSE_VALUE
> +              << EXYNOS850_TMU_CLK_SENSE_ON_SHIFT;
> +       writel(reg, data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_COUNTER_VALUE1);
> +
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_TRIM0);
> +       reg &= ~(EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIM0_MASK << EXYNOS850_TMU_BGRI_TRIM_SHIFT);
> +       reg &= ~(EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIM0_MASK << EXYNOS850_TMU_VREF_TRIM_SHIFT);
> +       reg &= ~(EXYNOS850_TMU_TRIM0_MASK << EXYNOS850_TMU_VBEI_TRIM_SHIFT);
> +       reg |= bgri << EXYNOS850_TMU_BGRI_TRIM_SHIFT;
> +       reg |= vref << EXYNOS850_TMU_VREF_TRIM_SHIFT;
> +       reg |= vbei << EXYNOS850_TMU_VBEI_TRIM_SHIFT;
> +       writel(reg, data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_TRIM0);
> +
> +       reg = readl(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_CONTROL1);
> +       reg &= ~(EXYNOS850_TMU_LPI_MODE_MASK << EXYNOS850_TMU_LPI_MODE_SHIFT);
> +       writel(reg, data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_CONTROL1);
> +}
> +
>  static void exynos4210_tmu_control(struct platform_device *pdev, bool on)
>  {
>         struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> @@ -676,7 +822,8 @@ static u32 get_emul_con_reg(struct exynos_tmu_data *data, unsigned int val,
>
>                 val &= ~(EXYNOS_EMUL_TIME_MASK << EXYNOS_EMUL_TIME_SHIFT);
>                 val |= (EXYNOS_EMUL_TIME << EXYNOS_EMUL_TIME_SHIFT);
> -               if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) {
> +               if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7 ||
> +                   data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS850) {
>                         val &= ~(EXYNOS7_EMUL_DATA_MASK <<
>                                 EXYNOS7_EMUL_DATA_SHIFT);
>                         val |= (temp_to_code(data, temp) <<
> @@ -706,7 +853,8 @@ static void exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation(struct exynos_tmu_data *data,
>                 emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
>         else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
>                 emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
> -       else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
> +       else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7 ||
> +                data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS850)
>                 emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;
>         else
>                 emul_con = EXYNOS_EMUL_CON;
> @@ -761,6 +909,12 @@ static int exynos7_tmu_read(struct exynos_tmu_data *data)
>                 EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_MASK;
>  }
>
> +static int exynos850_tmu_read(struct exynos_tmu_data *data)
> +{
> +       return readw(data->base + EXYNOS850_TMU_REG_CURRENT_TEMP0_1) &
> +              EXYNOS7_TMU_TEMP_MASK;
> +}
> +
>  static irqreturn_t exynos_tmu_threaded_irq(int irq, void *id)
>  {
>         struct exynos_tmu_data *data = id;
> @@ -787,7 +941,8 @@ static void exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs(struct exynos_tmu_data *data)
>         if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260) {
>                 tmu_intstat = EXYNOS5260_TMU_REG_INTSTAT;
>                 tmu_intclear = EXYNOS5260_TMU_REG_INTCLEAR;
> -       } else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) {
> +       } else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7 ||
> +                  data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS850) {
>                 tmu_intstat = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
>                 tmu_intclear = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
>         } else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433) {
> @@ -838,6 +993,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos_tmu_match[] = {
>         }, {
>                 .compatible = "samsung,exynos7-tmu",
>                 .data = (const void *)SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7,
> +       }, {
> +               .compatible = "samsung,exynos850-tmu",
> +               .data = (const void *)SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS850,
>         },
>         { },
>  };
> @@ -950,6 +1108,21 @@ static int exynos_map_dt_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 data->min_efuse_value = 15;
>                 data->max_efuse_value = 100;
>                 break;
> +       case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS850:
> +               data->tmu_set_low_temp = exynos850_tmu_set_low_temp;
> +               data->tmu_set_high_temp = exynos850_tmu_set_high_temp;
> +               data->tmu_disable_low = exynos850_tmu_disable_low;
> +               data->tmu_disable_high = exynos850_tmu_disable_high;
> +               data->tmu_set_crit_temp = exynos850_tmu_set_crit_temp;
> +               data->tmu_initialize = exynos850_tmu_initialize;
> +               data->tmu_control = exynos4210_tmu_control;
> +               data->tmu_read = exynos850_tmu_read;
> +               data->tmu_set_emulation = exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation;
> +               data->tmu_clear_irqs = exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs;
> +               data->efuse_value = 55;
> +               data->min_efuse_value = 0;
> +               data->max_efuse_value = 511;
> +               break;
>         default:
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Platform not supported\n");
>                 return -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.45.1
>