Message ID | 20240403051553.257864-1-andrea.righi@canonical.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | add Real-time Linux Analysis tool (rtla) to linux-tools | expand |
This looks good, but in patch 2, debian/rules.d/2-binary-arch.mk, in the line where you run make on rtla, you define VERSION="\"6.8.1\""'. That's fine for now until we pull in 6.8.2+, but in the future, we should set VERSION to something like ${raw_kernelversion} so we don't have to update it manually. Acked-by: Kevin Becker <kevin.becker@canonical.com> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 1:17 AM Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> wrote: > > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059080 > > [Impact] > > The **rtla** is a meta-tool that includes a set of commands that aims to > analyze the real-time properties of Linux. > > Considering the latest "low-latency" capabilities acquired by the > generic kernel and also considering the recent trend in Ubuntu to focus > on performance and observability (see for example > https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-performance-engineering-with-frame-pointers-by-default), > it makes sense to provide more tools that can help to analyze > timing/responsive performance, such as rtla. > > [Test case] > > Simple rtla usage to measure the timer irq / timer thread latency: > > $ sudo rtla timerlat > > [Fix] > > Enable the build of the rtla binary during the kernel build and ship it > with linux-tools. > > [Regression potential] > > The only potential regression is an increased amount of size in the > linux-tools package, due to the extra binary. > > However, the binary itself is really small, the kernel already has all > the required capabilities enabled and we don't need to introduce any > additional user-space dependency, therefore such extra space is expected > to be minimal.
On 03/04/2024 07:13, Andrea Righi wrote: > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059080 > > [Impact] > > The **rtla** is a meta-tool that includes a set of commands that aims to > analyze the real-time properties of Linux. > > Considering the latest "low-latency" capabilities acquired by the > generic kernel and also considering the recent trend in Ubuntu to focus > on performance and observability (see for example > https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-performance-engineering-with-frame-pointers-by-default), > it makes sense to provide more tools that can help to analyze > timing/responsive performance, such as rtla. > > [Test case] > > Simple rtla usage to measure the timer irq / timer thread latency: > > $ sudo rtla timerlat > > [Fix] > > Enable the build of the rtla binary during the kernel build and ship it > with linux-tools. > > [Regression potential] > > The only potential regression is an increased amount of size in the > linux-tools package, due to the extra binary. > > However, the binary itself is really small, the kernel already has all > the required capabilities enabled and we don't need to introduce any > additional user-space dependency, therefore such extra space is expected > to be minimal. > This seems to be applied to the noble and oracular trees.