| Message ID | 20240716213131.6036-2-james.quinlan@broadcom.com |
|---|---|
| State | Changes Requested |
| Headers | show |
| Series | PCI: brcnstb: Enable STB 7712 SOC | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| robh/checkpatch | success | |
| robh/patch-applied | success | |
| robh/dtbs-check | warning | build log |
| robh/dt-meta-schema | success |
On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote: > o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical > > o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules > <form letter> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. Thank you. </form letter> > o Add minItems/maxItems where needed. > > o Change maintainer: Nicolas has not been active for a while. It also > makes sense for a Broadcom employee to be the maintainer as many of the > details are privy to Broadcom. > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > --- > .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 26 ++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > index 11f8ea33240c..692f7ed7c98e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > title: Brcmstb PCIe Host Controller > > maintainers: > - - Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> > + - Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > > properties: > compatible: > @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ properties: > - brcm,bcm2711-pcie # The Raspberry Pi 4 > - brcm,bcm4908-pcie > - brcm,bcm7211-pcie # Broadcom STB version of RPi4 > - - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm > - brcm,bcm7216-pcie # Broadcom 7216 Arm > - - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm > + - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm > - brcm,bcm7425-pcie # Broadcom 7425 MIPs > - brcm,bcm7435-pcie # Broadcom 7435 MIPs > + - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm > > reg: > maxItems: 1 > @@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ properties: > minItems: 1 > maxItems: 3 > > + resets: > + minItems: 1 > + items: > + - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst > + - description: reset for phy reset calibration # rescal > + > + reset-names: > + minItems: 1 > + items: > + - const: perst > + - const: rescal There are no devices with two resets. Anyway, this does not match one of your variants which have first element as rescal. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:51 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical > > > > o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules > > > > <form letter> > This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > > It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully > addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you > just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and > either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. > > Thank you. > </form letter> I'm sorry Krzysztof, but AFAICT I paid attention to all of your comments and tried to answer them as best as I could. Please do not resort to a form letter; if you think I missed something(s) please oblige me and say what it is rather than having me search for something that you know and I do not. > > > o Add minItems/maxItems where needed. > > > > o Change maintainer: Nicolas has not been active for a while. It also > > makes sense for a Broadcom employee to be the maintainer as many of the > > details are privy to Broadcom. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > > --- > > .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 26 ++++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > index 11f8ea33240c..692f7ed7c98e 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > title: Brcmstb PCIe Host Controller > > > > maintainers: > > - - Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> > > + - Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > > > > properties: > > compatible: > > @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ properties: > > - brcm,bcm2711-pcie # The Raspberry Pi 4 > > - brcm,bcm4908-pcie > > - brcm,bcm7211-pcie # Broadcom STB version of RPi4 > > - - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm > > - brcm,bcm7216-pcie # Broadcom 7216 Arm > > - - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm > > + - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm > > - brcm,bcm7425-pcie # Broadcom 7425 MIPs > > - brcm,bcm7435-pcie # Broadcom 7435 MIPs > > + - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm > > > > reg: > > maxItems: 1 > > @@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ properties: > > minItems: 1 > > maxItems: 3 > > > > + resets: > > + minItems: 1 > > + items: > > + - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst > > + - description: reset for phy reset calibration # rescal > > + > > + reset-names: > > + minItems: 1 > > + items: > > + - const: perst > > + - const: rescal > > There are no devices with two resets. Anyway, this does not match one of > your variants which have first element as rescal. The 4908 chip exclusively uses the "perst" reset, and the 7216 chip exclusively uses the "rescal" reset. The rest of the chips use zero resets. All together, there are two resets. You are the one that wanted me to first list all resets at the top, and refer to them by the conditional rules. What am I missing here? Regards, Jim Quinlan Broadcom STB/CM > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
On 17/07/2024 15:20, Jim Quinlan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:51 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>> o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical >>> >>> o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules >>> >> >> <form letter> >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. >> >> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully >> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you >> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and >> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. >> >> Thank you. >> </form letter> > > I'm sorry Krzysztof, but AFAICT I paid attention to all of your comments and > tried to answer them as best as I could. Please do not resort to a > form letter; if > you think I missed something(s) please oblige me and say what it is rather than > having me search for something that you know and I do not. I do not see your response at all to my comments on patch #2. > >> >>> o Add minItems/maxItems where needed. >>> >>> o Change maintainer: Nicolas has not been active for a while. It also >>> makes sense for a Broadcom employee to be the maintainer as many of the >>> details are privy to Broadcom. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 26 ++++++++++++++----- >>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> index 11f8ea33240c..692f7ed7c98e 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >>> title: Brcmstb PCIe Host Controller >>> >>> maintainers: >>> - - Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> >>> + - Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> >>> >>> properties: >>> compatible: >>> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ properties: >>> - brcm,bcm2711-pcie # The Raspberry Pi 4 >>> - brcm,bcm4908-pcie >>> - brcm,bcm7211-pcie # Broadcom STB version of RPi4 >>> - - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm >>> - brcm,bcm7216-pcie # Broadcom 7216 Arm >>> - - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm >>> + - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm >>> - brcm,bcm7425-pcie # Broadcom 7425 MIPs >>> - brcm,bcm7435-pcie # Broadcom 7435 MIPs >>> + - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm >>> >>> reg: >>> maxItems: 1 >>> @@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ properties: >>> minItems: 1 >>> maxItems: 3 >>> >>> + resets: >>> + minItems: 1 >>> + items: >>> + - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst >>> + - description: reset for phy reset calibration # rescal >>> + >>> + reset-names: >>> + minItems: 1 >>> + items: >>> + - const: perst >>> + - const: rescal >> >> There are no devices with two resets. Anyway, this does not match one of >> your variants which have first element as rescal. > > The 4908 chip exclusively uses the "perst" reset, and the 7216 chip > exclusively uses the "rescal" reset. The rest of the chips use zero > resets. All together, there are two resets. This is not enum, but a list. What you do mean overall two resets? You have a chip which is both 4908 and 7216 at the same time? How is this possible? > > You are the one that wanted me to first list all resets at the top, > and refer to them by the conditional rules. No, I wanted widest constraints at the top. My comment at v2 was already saying this: "This does not match what you have in conditional, so just keep min and max Items here." and you have numerous examples in the code for this. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 7/16/24 23:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote: >> o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical >> >> o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules >> > > <form letter> > This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > > It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully > addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you > just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and > either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. Maybe the feedback was not clear, the fault cannot always be in the submitter, right? > > Thank you. > </form letter> > >> o Add minItems/maxItems where needed. >> >> o Change maintainer: Nicolas has not been active for a while. It also >> makes sense for a Broadcom employee to be the maintainer as many of the >> details are privy to Broadcom. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> >> --- >> .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 26 ++++++++++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >> index 11f8ea33240c..692f7ed7c98e 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> title: Brcmstb PCIe Host Controller >> >> maintainers: >> - - Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> >> + - Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> >> >> properties: >> compatible: >> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ properties: >> - brcm,bcm2711-pcie # The Raspberry Pi 4 >> - brcm,bcm4908-pcie >> - brcm,bcm7211-pcie # Broadcom STB version of RPi4 >> - - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm >> - brcm,bcm7216-pcie # Broadcom 7216 Arm >> - - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm >> + - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm >> - brcm,bcm7425-pcie # Broadcom 7425 MIPs >> - brcm,bcm7435-pcie # Broadcom 7435 MIPs >> + - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm >> >> reg: >> maxItems: 1 >> @@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ properties: >> minItems: 1 >> maxItems: 3 >> >> + resets: >> + minItems: 1 >> + items: >> + - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst >> + - description: reset for phy reset calibration # rescal >> + >> + reset-names: >> + minItems: 1 >> + items: >> + - const: perst >> + - const: rescal > > There are no devices with two resets. Anyway, this does not match one of > your variants which have first element as rescal. Just to be clear, is the diff below what you would expect to see when applying both patch 1 and 4 in succession, that is the reset properties are described "generically" and the conditional section only describes the order and values: diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml index 11f8ea33240c..faab7291d722 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml @@ -95,6 +95,28 @@ properties: minItems: 1 maxItems: 3 + resets: + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 3 + oneOf: + - description: reset controller handling the PERST# signal + - description: phandle pointing to the RESCAL reset controller + - items: + - description: phandle pointing to the RESCAL reset controller + - description: reset for PCIe/CPU bus bridge + - description: reset for soft PCIe core reset + + reset-names: + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 3 + oneOf: + - const: perst + - const: rescal + - items: + - const: rescal + - const: bridge + - const: swinit + required: - compatible - reg @@ -118,8 +140,7 @@ allOf: then: properties: resets: - items: - - description: reset controller handling the PERST# signal + maxItems: 1 reset-names: items: @@ -136,8 +157,7 @@ allOf: then: properties: resets: - items: - - description: phandle pointing to the RESCAL reset controller + maxItems: 1 reset-names: items: @@ -146,6 +166,22 @@ allOf: required: - resets - reset-names + - if: + properties: + compatible: + contains: + const: brcm,bcm7712-pcie + then: + properties: + resets: + minItems: 3 + + reset-names: + minItems: 3 + + required: + - resets + - reset-names unevaluatedProperties: false Thanks! -- Florian
On 17/07/2024 23:06, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> + resets: >>> + minItems: 1 >>> + items: >>> + - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst >>> + - description: reset for phy reset calibration # rescal >>> + >>> + reset-names: >>> + minItems: 1 >>> + items: >>> + - const: perst >>> + - const: rescal >> >> There are no devices with two resets. Anyway, this does not match one of >> your variants which have first element as rescal. > > Just to be clear, is the diff below what you would expect to see when > applying both patch 1 and 4 in succession, that is the reset properties > are described "generically" and the conditional section only describes > the order and values: Yeah, this would work. I still propose the format I provided link to (here in this thread or in my talks). Best regards, Krzysztof
On 17/07/2024 23:06, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 7/16/24 23:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>> o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical >>> >>> o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules >>> >> >> <form letter> >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. >> >> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully >> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you >> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and >> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. > > Maybe the feedback was not clear, the fault cannot always be in the > submitter, right? That why it is nice to ack each reviewers comment. If reviewers comments are somehow trickier, then such acks or further clarifications are even more useful. Did it happen for v3? No. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:51 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical > > > > o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules > > > > <form letter> > This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > > It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully > addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you > just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and > either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. > > Thank you. > </form letter> > > > o Add minItems/maxItems where needed. > > > > o Change maintainer: Nicolas has not been active for a while. It also > > makes sense for a Broadcom employee to be the maintainer as many of the > > details are privy to Broadcom. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > > --- > > .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 26 ++++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > index 11f8ea33240c..692f7ed7c98e 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > title: Brcmstb PCIe Host Controller > > > > maintainers: > > - - Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> > > + - Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > > > > properties: > > compatible: > > @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ properties: > > - brcm,bcm2711-pcie # The Raspberry Pi 4 > > - brcm,bcm4908-pcie > > - brcm,bcm7211-pcie # Broadcom STB version of RPi4 > > - - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm > > - brcm,bcm7216-pcie # Broadcom 7216 Arm > > - - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm > > + - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm > > - brcm,bcm7425-pcie # Broadcom 7425 MIPs > > - brcm,bcm7435-pcie # Broadcom 7435 MIPs > > + - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm > > > > reg: > > maxItems: 1 > > @@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ properties: > > minItems: 1 > > maxItems: 3 > > > > + resets: > > + minItems: 1 > > + items: > > + - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst > > + - description: reset for phy reset calibration # rescal > > + > > + reset-names: > > + minItems: 1 > > + items: > > + - const: perst > > + - const: rescal > > There are no devices with two resets. Anyway, this does not match one of > your variants which have first element as rescal. Hello Krzysztof, At this commit there are two resets; the 4908 requires "perst" and the 7216 requires "rescal". I now think what you are looking for is the top-level description of something like resets: maxItems: 1 oneOf: - description: reset controller handling the PERST# signal - description: phandle pointing to the RESCAL reset controller reset-names: maxItems: 1 oneOf: - const: perst - const: rescal I left out minItems because imItems==maxItems=1 Before I was giving both of them as the "potential candidates list" that will be used further on, but this is not how Yaml should be used. Is the above in the right direction? Regards, Jim Quinlan Broadcom STB/CM > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 9:30 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 17/07/2024 15:20, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:51 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > >> On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote: > >>> o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical > >>> > >>> o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules > >>> > >> > >> <form letter> > >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > >> > >> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully > >> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you > >> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and > >> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. > >> > >> Thank you. > >> </form letter> > > > > I'm sorry Krzysztof, but AFAICT I paid attention to all of your comments and > > tried to answer them as best as I could. Please do not resort to a > > form letter; if > > you think I missed something(s) please oblige me and say what it is rather than > > having me search for something that you know and I do not. > > I do not see your response at all to my comments on patch #2. > > > > >> > >>> o Add minItems/maxItems where needed. > >>> > >>> o Change maintainer: Nicolas has not been active for a while. It also > >>> makes sense for a Broadcom employee to be the maintainer as many of the > >>> details are privy to Broadcom. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > >>> --- > >>> .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 26 ++++++++++++++----- > >>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > >>> index 11f8ea33240c..692f7ed7c98e 100644 > >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > >>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > >>> title: Brcmstb PCIe Host Controller > >>> > >>> maintainers: > >>> - - Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> > >>> + - Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > >>> > >>> properties: > >>> compatible: > >>> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ properties: > >>> - brcm,bcm2711-pcie # The Raspberry Pi 4 > >>> - brcm,bcm4908-pcie > >>> - brcm,bcm7211-pcie # Broadcom STB version of RPi4 > >>> - - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm > >>> - brcm,bcm7216-pcie # Broadcom 7216 Arm > >>> - - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm > >>> + - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm > >>> - brcm,bcm7425-pcie # Broadcom 7425 MIPs > >>> - brcm,bcm7435-pcie # Broadcom 7435 MIPs > >>> + - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm > >>> > >>> reg: > >>> maxItems: 1 > >>> @@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ properties: > >>> minItems: 1 > >>> maxItems: 3 > >>> > >>> + resets: > >>> + minItems: 1 > >>> + items: > >>> + - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst > >>> + - description: reset for phy reset calibration # rescal > >>> + > >>> + reset-names: > >>> + minItems: 1 > >>> + items: > >>> + - const: perst > >>> + - const: rescal > >> > >> There are no devices with two resets. Anyway, this does not match one of > >> your variants which have first element as rescal. > > > > The 4908 chip exclusively uses the "perst" reset, and the 7216 chip > > exclusively uses the "rescal" reset. The rest of the chips use zero > > resets. All together, there are two resets. > > This is not enum, but a list. What you do mean overall two resets? You > have a chip which is both 4908 and 7216 at the same time? How is this > possible? > > > > > You are the one that wanted me to first list all resets at the top, > > and refer to them by the conditional rules. > > No, I wanted widest constraints at the top. Can you explain what you mean by "widest constraint"? I did not see the word "wide" in any of the Linux YAML documentation. > > My comment at v2 was already saying this: > > "This does not match what you have in conditional, so just keep min and > max Items here." > Okay, what I was referring to was your V1 response: "Fix the binding first - properties should be defined in top level "properties:" and then customized." I think this is correct but I have not been describing the reset/reset-names properties properly at the top level; i.e. I have been giving a full list instead of using "oneOf". Regards, Jim Quinlan Broadcom STB/CM > and you have numerous examples in the code for this. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
On 23/07/2024 20:44, Jim Quinlan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:51 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>> o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical >>> >>> o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules >>> >> >> <form letter> >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. >> >> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully >> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you >> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and >> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. >> >> Thank you. >> </form letter> >> >>> o Add minItems/maxItems where needed. >>> >>> o Change maintainer: Nicolas has not been active for a while. It also >>> makes sense for a Broadcom employee to be the maintainer as many of the >>> details are privy to Broadcom. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 26 ++++++++++++++----- >>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> index 11f8ea33240c..692f7ed7c98e 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >>> title: Brcmstb PCIe Host Controller >>> >>> maintainers: >>> - - Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> >>> + - Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> >>> >>> properties: >>> compatible: >>> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ properties: >>> - brcm,bcm2711-pcie # The Raspberry Pi 4 >>> - brcm,bcm4908-pcie >>> - brcm,bcm7211-pcie # Broadcom STB version of RPi4 >>> - - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm >>> - brcm,bcm7216-pcie # Broadcom 7216 Arm >>> - - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm >>> + - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm >>> - brcm,bcm7425-pcie # Broadcom 7425 MIPs >>> - brcm,bcm7435-pcie # Broadcom 7435 MIPs >>> + - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm >>> >>> reg: >>> maxItems: 1 >>> @@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ properties: >>> minItems: 1 >>> maxItems: 3 >>> >>> + resets: >>> + minItems: 1 >>> + items: >>> + - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst >>> + - description: reset for phy reset calibration # rescal >>> + >>> + reset-names: >>> + minItems: 1 >>> + items: >>> + - const: perst >>> + - const: rescal >> >> There are no devices with two resets. Anyway, this does not match one of >> your variants which have first element as rescal. > > > Hello Krzysztof, > > At this commit there are two resets; the 4908 requires "perst" and the > 7216 requires "rescal". I now think what you are looking for is the > top-level > description of something like > > resets: > maxItems: 1 > oneOf: > - description: reset controller handling the PERST# signal > - description: phandle pointing to the RESCAL reset controller Now tell me, what sort of new information comes with this description? "Phandle"? It cannot be anything else. Redundant. "Pointing to"? Redundant. "reset-controller"? Well, resets always point to reset controller. So what is the point of this description? Any point? > > reset-names: > maxItems: 1 > oneOf: > - const: perst > - const: rescal > > I left out minItems because imItems==maxItems=1 > > Before I was giving both of them as the "potential candidates list" > that will be used further on, but this is not how Yaml should be used. > > Is the above in the right direction? It's over complicated. First maxItems are redundant, because you define number of items in items. Second, you have EXACTLY the same case as the hardware for which I gave you bindings to use. I don't understand why you insist on doing things differently, but you can. Take a look at many other bindings how they achieve this - there are many, many examples. But do not invent third or fourth method... Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 4:05 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 23/07/2024 20:44, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:51 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > >> On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote: > >>> o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical > >>> > >>> o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules > >>> > >> > >> <form letter> > >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > >> > >> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully > >> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you > >> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and > >> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. > >> > >> Thank you. > >> </form letter> > >> > >>> o Add minItems/maxItems where needed. > >>> > >>> o Change maintainer: Nicolas has not been active for a while. It also > >>> makes sense for a Broadcom employee to be the maintainer as many of the > >>> details are privy to Broadcom. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > >>> --- > >>> .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 26 ++++++++++++++----- > >>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > >>> index 11f8ea33240c..692f7ed7c98e 100644 > >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml > >>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > >>> title: Brcmstb PCIe Host Controller > >>> > >>> maintainers: > >>> - - Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> > >>> + - Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> > >>> > >>> properties: > >>> compatible: > >>> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ properties: > >>> - brcm,bcm2711-pcie # The Raspberry Pi 4 > >>> - brcm,bcm4908-pcie > >>> - brcm,bcm7211-pcie # Broadcom STB version of RPi4 > >>> - - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm > >>> - brcm,bcm7216-pcie # Broadcom 7216 Arm > >>> - - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm > >>> + - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm > >>> - brcm,bcm7425-pcie # Broadcom 7425 MIPs > >>> - brcm,bcm7435-pcie # Broadcom 7435 MIPs > >>> + - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm > >>> > >>> reg: > >>> maxItems: 1 > >>> @@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ properties: > >>> minItems: 1 > >>> maxItems: 3 > >>> > >>> + resets: > >>> + minItems: 1 > >>> + items: > >>> + - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst > >>> + - description: reset for phy reset calibration # rescal > >>> + > >>> + reset-names: > >>> + minItems: 1 > >>> + items: > >>> + - const: perst > >>> + - const: rescal > >> > >> There are no devices with two resets. Anyway, this does not match one of > >> your variants which have first element as rescal. > > > > > > Hello Krzysztof, > > > > At this commit there are two resets; the 4908 requires "perst" and the > > 7216 requires "rescal". I now think what you are looking for is the > > top-level > > description of something like > > > > resets: > > maxItems: 1 > > oneOf: > > - description: reset controller handling the PERST# signal > > - description: phandle pointing to the RESCAL reset controller > > Now tell me, what sort of new information comes with this description? > "Phandle"? It cannot be anything else. Redundant. "Pointing to"? > Redundant. "reset-controller"? Well, resets always point to reset > controller. > > So what is the point of this description? Any point? > > > > > reset-names: > > maxItems: 1 > > oneOf: > > - const: perst > > - const: rescal > > > > I left out minItems because imItems==maxItems=1 > > > > Before I was giving both of them as the "potential candidates list" > > that will be used further on, but this is not how Yaml should be used. > > > > Is the above in the right direction? > > It's over complicated. First maxItems are redundant, because you define > number of items in items. Second, you have EXACTLY the same case as the > hardware for which I gave you bindings to use. I don't understand why > you insist on doing things differently, but you can. Take a look at many > other bindings how they achieve this - there are many, many examples. > But do not invent third or fourth method... ack, I will follow the qcom,ufs.yaml file you referenced. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml index 11f8ea33240c..692f7ed7c98e 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# title: Brcmstb PCIe Host Controller maintainers: - - Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> + - Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> properties: compatible: @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ properties: - brcm,bcm2711-pcie # The Raspberry Pi 4 - brcm,bcm4908-pcie - brcm,bcm7211-pcie # Broadcom STB version of RPi4 - - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm - brcm,bcm7216-pcie # Broadcom 7216 Arm - - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm + - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm - brcm,bcm7425-pcie # Broadcom 7425 MIPs - brcm,bcm7435-pcie # Broadcom 7435 MIPs + - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm reg: maxItems: 1 @@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ properties: minItems: 1 maxItems: 3 + resets: + minItems: 1 + items: + - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst + - description: reset for phy reset calibration # rescal + + reset-names: + minItems: 1 + items: + - const: perst + - const: rescal + required: - compatible - reg @@ -118,8 +130,8 @@ allOf: then: properties: resets: - items: - - description: reset controller handling the PERST# signal + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 1 reset-names: items: @@ -136,8 +148,8 @@ allOf: then: properties: resets: - items: - - description: phandle pointing to the RESCAL reset controller + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 1 reset-names: items:
o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules o Add minItems/maxItems where needed. o Change maintainer: Nicolas has not been active for a while. It also makes sense for a Broadcom employee to be the maintainer as many of the details are privy to Broadcom. Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> --- .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 26 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)