mbox series

[v3,0/4] Add minimal boot support for Raspberry Pi 5

Message ID cover.1716277695.git.andrea.porta@suse.com
Headers show
Series Add minimal boot support for Raspberry Pi 5 | expand

Message

Andrea della Porta May 21, 2024, 8:35 a.m. UTC
Hi,

This patchset adds minimal support for the Broadcom BCM2712 SoC and for
the on-board SDHCI controller on Broadcom BCM2712 in order to make it
possible to boot (particularly) a Raspberry Pi 5 from SD card and get a
console through uart.
Changes to arm64/defconfig are not needed since the actual options work
as they are.
This work is heavily based on downstream contributions.

Tested on Tumbleweed substituting the stock kernel with upstream one,
either chainloading uboot+grub+kernel or directly booting the kernel
from 1st stage bootloader. Steps to reproduce:
- prepare an SD card from a Raspberry enabled raw image, mount the first
  FAT partition.
- make sure the FAT partition is big enough to contain the kernel,
  anything bigger than 64Mb is usually enough, depending on your kernel
  config options.
- build the kernel and dtbs making sure that the support for your root
  fs type is compiled as builtin.
- copy the kernel image in your FAT partition overwriting the older one
  (e.g. kernel*.img for Raspberry Pi OS or u-boot.bin for Tumbleweed).
- copy arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dtb on FAT partition.
- make sure you have a cmdline.txt file in FAT partition with the
  following content:
  # cat /boot/efi/cmdline.txt
  root=/dev/mmcblk0p3 rootwait rw console=tty ignore_loglevel earlycon
  console=ttyAMA10,115200
- if you experience random SD issues during boot, try to set
  initial_turbo=0 in config.txt.

Changes in V3:

DTS:
- uart0 renamed to uart10 to reflect the current indexing (ttyAMA10
  and serial10)
- updated the license to (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
- sd_io_1v8_reg 'states' property have second cells as decimal instead
  of hex.
- root node has size-cells=<2> now to accommodate for the DRAM controller
  and the address bus mapping that goes beyond 4GB. As a consequence,
  memory, axi and reserved-memory nodes have also size-cells=<2> and
  subnodes reg and ranges properties have been updated accordingly
- ranges property in 'axi' node has been fixed, reg properties of sdio1
  and gicv2 subnodes have been adjusted according to the new mapping
- 'interrupt-controller@7d517000' node is now enabled by default
- dropped 'arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured' as it is no longer
  relevant on A76 core
- l2 cache nodes moved under respective cpus, since they are per-cpu
- dropped psci cpu functions properties
- added the hypervisor EL2 virtual timer interrupt to the 'timer' node
- splitted-lines url are now on a single line

sdhci-brcmstb.c:
- simplified MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK leveraging already existing definitions
- MMC_CAP_UHS_MASK renamed to MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK to better reflect
  its purpose. Added also a comment.
- sdhci_brcmstb_set_power() replaced with the already existing (and
  equivalent) sdhci_set_power_and_bus_voltage()

DT-bindings:
- removed the BCM2712 specific example, as per Rob's request.


Changes in V2:

- the patchshet has been considerably simplified, both in terms of dts and
  driver code. Notably, the pinctrl/pinmux driver (and associated binding)
  was not strictly needed to use the SD card so it has been dropped
- dropped the optional SD express support patch
- the patches order has been revisited
- pass all checks (binding, dtb, checkpatch)


Many thanks,
Andrea

References:
- Link to V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1713036964.git.andrea.porta@suse.com/
- Link to V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1715332922.git.andrea.porta@suse.com/

Andrea della Porta (4):
  dt-bindings: arm: bcm: Add BCM2712 SoC support
  dt-bindings: mmc: Add support for BCM2712 SD host controller
  mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Add BCM2712 support
  arm64: dts: broadcom: Add support for BCM2712

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/bcm2835.yaml  |   6 +
 .../bindings/mmc/brcm,sdhci-brcmstb.yaml      |   4 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile         |   1 +
 .../boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts     |  64 ++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712.dtsi     | 292 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c              |  65 ++++
 6 files changed, 432 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712.dtsi

Comments

Stefan Wahren May 21, 2024, 12:26 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Andrea,

Am 21.05.24 um 10:35 schrieb Andrea della Porta:
> Broadcom BCM2712 SoC has an SDHCI card controller using the SDIO CFG
> register block present on other STB chips. Add support for BCM2712
> SD capabilities of this chipset.
> The silicon is SD Express capable but this driver port does not currently
> include that feature yet.
> Based on downstream driver by raspberry foundation maintained kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> index 9053526fa212..b349262da36e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,21 @@
>
>   #define SDHCI_ARASAN_CQE_BASE_ADDR		0x200
>
> +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY			0x4c
> +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL		GENMASK(13, 12)
> +
> +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL				0x0
> +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN		BIT(31)
> +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV		BIT(30)
> +
> +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE			0x1ac
> +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE	BIT(31)
> +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE		BIT(0)
> +
> +#define MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK	(MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_2V | MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_8V)
> +/* Select all SD UHS type I SDR speed above 50MB/s */
> +#define MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK	(MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104)
> +
>   struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
>   	void __iomem *cfg_regs;
>   	unsigned int flags;
> @@ -38,6 +53,7 @@ struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
>   };
>
>   struct brcmstb_match_priv {
> +	void (*cfginit)(struct sdhci_host *host);
>   	void (*hs400es)(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios);
>   	struct sdhci_ops *ops;
>   	const unsigned int flags;
> @@ -168,6 +184,38 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
>   	sdhci_writew(host, ctrl_2, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>   }
>
> +static void sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> +	struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *brcmstb_priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> +	u32 reg, base_clk_mhz;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If we support a speed that requires tuning,
> +	 * then select the delay line PHY as the clock source.
> +	 */
> +	if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK) || (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK)) {
> +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE;
> +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE;
> +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> +	}
> +
> +	if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) ||
> +	    (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)) {
> +		/* Force presence */
> +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV;
> +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN;
> +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Guesstimate the timer frequency (controller base clock) */
> +	base_clk_mhz = max_t(u32, clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk) / (1000 * 1000), 1);
> +	reg = SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL | base_clk_mhz;
> +	writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY);
This part assumes the clock isn't changed afterwards, see below ...
> +}
> +
>   static void sdhci_brcmstb_dumpregs(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>   {
>   	sdhci_dumpregs(mmc_priv(mmc));
> @@ -200,6 +248,14 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops = {
>   	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
>   };
>
> +static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712 = {
> +	.set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
> +	.set_power = sdhci_set_power_and_bus_voltage,
> +	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> +	.reset = sdhci_reset,
> +	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> +};
> +
>   static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_7216 = {
>   	.set_clock = sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock,
>   	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> @@ -214,6 +270,11 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0 = {
>   	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling,
>   };
>
> +static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_2712 = {
> +	.cfginit = sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712,
> +	.ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712,
> +};
> +
>   static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_7425 = {
>   	.flags = BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_NO_64BIT |
>   	BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_BROKEN_TIMEOUT,
> @@ -238,6 +299,7 @@ static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_74165b0 = {
>   };
>
>   static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused sdhci_brcm_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2712-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_2712 },
>   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7425-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7425 },
>   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7445 },
>   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7216-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7216 },
> @@ -370,6 +432,9 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	    (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES))
>   		host->mmc_host_ops.hs400_enhanced_strobe = match_priv->hs400es;
>
> +	if (match_priv->cfginit)
> +		match_priv->cfginit(host);
> +
I'm not sure this is the right place to call cfginit.
sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712 retrives the current controller base clock,
but at the end of  sdhci_brcmstb_probe this clock frequency could be
adjusted by the device property "clock-frequency". So i'm not sure this
is intended.
>   	/*
>   	 * Supply the existing CAPS, but clear the UHS modes. This
>   	 * will allow these modes to be specified by device tree
Rob Herring (Arm) May 21, 2024, 12:53 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 21 May 2024 10:35:12 +0200, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patchset adds minimal support for the Broadcom BCM2712 SoC and for
> the on-board SDHCI controller on Broadcom BCM2712 in order to make it
> possible to boot (particularly) a Raspberry Pi 5 from SD card and get a
> console through uart.
> Changes to arm64/defconfig are not needed since the actual options work
> as they are.
> This work is heavily based on downstream contributions.
> 
> Tested on Tumbleweed substituting the stock kernel with upstream one,
> either chainloading uboot+grub+kernel or directly booting the kernel
> from 1st stage bootloader. Steps to reproduce:
> - prepare an SD card from a Raspberry enabled raw image, mount the first
>   FAT partition.
> - make sure the FAT partition is big enough to contain the kernel,
>   anything bigger than 64Mb is usually enough, depending on your kernel
>   config options.
> - build the kernel and dtbs making sure that the support for your root
>   fs type is compiled as builtin.
> - copy the kernel image in your FAT partition overwriting the older one
>   (e.g. kernel*.img for Raspberry Pi OS or u-boot.bin for Tumbleweed).
> - copy arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dtb on FAT partition.
> - make sure you have a cmdline.txt file in FAT partition with the
>   following content:
>   # cat /boot/efi/cmdline.txt
>   root=/dev/mmcblk0p3 rootwait rw console=tty ignore_loglevel earlycon
>   console=ttyAMA10,115200
> - if you experience random SD issues during boot, try to set
>   initial_turbo=0 in config.txt.
> 
> Changes in V3:
> 
> DTS:
> - uart0 renamed to uart10 to reflect the current indexing (ttyAMA10
>   and serial10)
> - updated the license to (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> - sd_io_1v8_reg 'states' property have second cells as decimal instead
>   of hex.
> - root node has size-cells=<2> now to accommodate for the DRAM controller
>   and the address bus mapping that goes beyond 4GB. As a consequence,
>   memory, axi and reserved-memory nodes have also size-cells=<2> and
>   subnodes reg and ranges properties have been updated accordingly
> - ranges property in 'axi' node has been fixed, reg properties of sdio1
>   and gicv2 subnodes have been adjusted according to the new mapping
> - 'interrupt-controller@7d517000' node is now enabled by default
> - dropped 'arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured' as it is no longer
>   relevant on A76 core
> - l2 cache nodes moved under respective cpus, since they are per-cpu
> - dropped psci cpu functions properties
> - added the hypervisor EL2 virtual timer interrupt to the 'timer' node
> - splitted-lines url are now on a single line
> 
> sdhci-brcmstb.c:
> - simplified MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK leveraging already existing definitions
> - MMC_CAP_UHS_MASK renamed to MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK to better reflect
>   its purpose. Added also a comment.
> - sdhci_brcmstb_set_power() replaced with the already existing (and
>   equivalent) sdhci_set_power_and_bus_voltage()
> 
> DT-bindings:
> - removed the BCM2712 specific example, as per Rob's request.
> 
> 
> Changes in V2:
> 
> - the patchshet has been considerably simplified, both in terms of dts and
>   driver code. Notably, the pinctrl/pinmux driver (and associated binding)
>   was not strictly needed to use the SD card so it has been dropped
> - dropped the optional SD express support patch
> - the patches order has been revisited
> - pass all checks (binding, dtb, checkpatch)
> 
> 
> Many thanks,
> Andrea
> 
> References:
> - Link to V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1713036964.git.andrea.porta@suse.com/
> - Link to V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1715332922.git.andrea.porta@suse.com/
> 
> Andrea della Porta (4):
>   dt-bindings: arm: bcm: Add BCM2712 SoC support
>   dt-bindings: mmc: Add support for BCM2712 SD host controller
>   mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Add BCM2712 support
>   arm64: dts: broadcom: Add support for BCM2712
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/bcm2835.yaml  |   6 +
>  .../bindings/mmc/brcm,sdhci-brcmstb.yaml      |   4 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile         |   1 +
>  .../boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts     |  64 ++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712.dtsi     | 292 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c              |  65 ++++
>  6 files changed, 432 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712.dtsi
> 
> --
> 2.35.3
> 
> 
> 


My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
series.

Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings
are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform
maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply
unless the platform maintainer has comments.

If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then
make sure dt-schema is up to date:

  pip3 install dtschema --upgrade


New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dtb' for cover.1716277695.git.andrea.porta@suse.com:

arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dtb: /soc@107c000000/timer@7c003000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['brcm,bcm2835-system-timer']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dtb: /soc@107c000000/local-intc@7cd00000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['brcm,bcm2836-l1-intc']
Andrea della Porta May 21, 2024, 1 p.m. UTC | #3
On 14:26 Tue 21 May     , Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
> 
> Am 21.05.24 um 10:35 schrieb Andrea della Porta:
> > Broadcom BCM2712 SoC has an SDHCI card controller using the SDIO CFG
> > register block present on other STB chips. Add support for BCM2712
> > SD capabilities of this chipset.
> > The silicon is SD Express capable but this driver port does not currently
> > include that feature yet.
> > Based on downstream driver by raspberry foundation maintained kernel.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> > index 9053526fa212..b349262da36e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,21 @@
> > 
> >   #define SDHCI_ARASAN_CQE_BASE_ADDR		0x200
> > 
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY			0x4c
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL		GENMASK(13, 12)
> > +
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL				0x0
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN		BIT(31)
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV		BIT(30)
> > +
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE			0x1ac
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE	BIT(31)
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE		BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK	(MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_2V | MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_8V)
> > +/* Select all SD UHS type I SDR speed above 50MB/s */
> > +#define MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK	(MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104)
> > +
> >   struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
> >   	void __iomem *cfg_regs;
> >   	unsigned int flags;
> > @@ -38,6 +53,7 @@ struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
> >   };
> > 
> >   struct brcmstb_match_priv {
> > +	void (*cfginit)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> >   	void (*hs400es)(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios);
> >   	struct sdhci_ops *ops;
> >   	const unsigned int flags;
> > @@ -168,6 +184,38 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
> >   	sdhci_writew(host, ctrl_2, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> >   }
> > 
> > +static void sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712(struct sdhci_host *host)
> > +{
> > +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> > +	struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *brcmstb_priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> > +	u32 reg, base_clk_mhz;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If we support a speed that requires tuning,
> > +	 * then select the delay line PHY as the clock source.
> > +	 */
> > +	if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK) || (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK)) {
> > +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> > +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE;
> > +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE;
> > +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) ||
> > +	    (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)) {
> > +		/* Force presence */
> > +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> > +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV;
> > +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN;
> > +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Guesstimate the timer frequency (controller base clock) */
> > +	base_clk_mhz = max_t(u32, clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk) / (1000 * 1000), 1);
> > +	reg = SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL | base_clk_mhz;
> > +	writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY);
> This part assumes the clock isn't changed afterwards, see below ...
> > +}
> > +
> >   static void sdhci_brcmstb_dumpregs(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> >   {
> >   	sdhci_dumpregs(mmc_priv(mmc));
> > @@ -200,6 +248,14 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops = {
> >   	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> >   };
> > 
> > +static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712 = {
> > +	.set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
> > +	.set_power = sdhci_set_power_and_bus_voltage,
> > +	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> > +	.reset = sdhci_reset,
> > +	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> > +};
> > +
> >   static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_7216 = {
> >   	.set_clock = sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock,
> >   	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> > @@ -214,6 +270,11 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0 = {
> >   	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling,
> >   };
> > 
> > +static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_2712 = {
> > +	.cfginit = sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712,
> > +	.ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712,
> > +};
> > +
> >   static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_7425 = {
> >   	.flags = BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_NO_64BIT |
> >   	BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_BROKEN_TIMEOUT,
> > @@ -238,6 +299,7 @@ static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_74165b0 = {
> >   };
> > 
> >   static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused sdhci_brcm_of_match[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2712-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_2712 },
> >   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7425-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7425 },
> >   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7445 },
> >   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7216-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7216 },
> > @@ -370,6 +432,9 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   	    (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES))
> >   		host->mmc_host_ops.hs400_enhanced_strobe = match_priv->hs400es;
> > 
> > +	if (match_priv->cfginit)
> > +		match_priv->cfginit(host);
> > +
> I'm not sure this is the right place to call cfginit.
> sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712 retrives the current controller base clock,
> but at the end of  sdhci_brcmstb_probe this clock frequency could be
> adjusted by the device property "clock-frequency". So i'm not sure this
> is intended.

Some tests reveal that cfginit() must be called for certain type of UHS SD cards, 
otherwise those cards do not work at all. This of course does not mean that the
calling sequence is correctly ordererd and it may just work out of luck.
I'm investigating...

Many thanks,
Andrea

> >   	/*
> >   	 * Supply the existing CAPS, but clear the UHS modes. This
> >   	 * will allow these modes to be specified by device tree
>
Andrea della Porta May 25, 2024, 5:39 a.m. UTC | #4
On 14:26 Tue 21 May     , Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
> 
> Am 21.05.24 um 10:35 schrieb Andrea della Porta:
> > Broadcom BCM2712 SoC has an SDHCI card controller using the SDIO CFG
> > register block present on other STB chips. Add support for BCM2712
> > SD capabilities of this chipset.
> > The silicon is SD Express capable but this driver port does not currently
> > include that feature yet.
> > Based on downstream driver by raspberry foundation maintained kernel.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> > index 9053526fa212..b349262da36e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,21 @@
> > 
> >   #define SDHCI_ARASAN_CQE_BASE_ADDR		0x200
> > 
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY			0x4c
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL		GENMASK(13, 12)
> > +
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL				0x0
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN		BIT(31)
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV		BIT(30)
> > +
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE			0x1ac
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE	BIT(31)
> > +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE		BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK	(MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_2V | MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_8V)
> > +/* Select all SD UHS type I SDR speed above 50MB/s */
> > +#define MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK	(MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104)
> > +
> >   struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
> >   	void __iomem *cfg_regs;
> >   	unsigned int flags;
> > @@ -38,6 +53,7 @@ struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
> >   };
> > 
> >   struct brcmstb_match_priv {
> > +	void (*cfginit)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> >   	void (*hs400es)(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios);
> >   	struct sdhci_ops *ops;
> >   	const unsigned int flags;
> > @@ -168,6 +184,38 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
> >   	sdhci_writew(host, ctrl_2, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> >   }
> > 
> > +static void sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712(struct sdhci_host *host)
> > +{
> > +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> > +	struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *brcmstb_priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> > +	u32 reg, base_clk_mhz;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If we support a speed that requires tuning,
> > +	 * then select the delay line PHY as the clock source.
> > +	 */
> > +	if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK) || (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK)) {
> > +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> > +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE;
> > +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE;
> > +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) ||
> > +	    (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)) {
> > +		/* Force presence */
> > +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> > +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV;
> > +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN;
> > +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Guesstimate the timer frequency (controller base clock) */
> > +	base_clk_mhz = max_t(u32, clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk) / (1000 * 1000), 1);
> > +	reg = SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL | base_clk_mhz;
> > +	writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY);
> This part assumes the clock isn't changed afterwards, see below ...
> > +}
> > +
> >   static void sdhci_brcmstb_dumpregs(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> >   {
> >   	sdhci_dumpregs(mmc_priv(mmc));
> > @@ -200,6 +248,14 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops = {
> >   	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> >   };
> > 
> > +static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712 = {
> > +	.set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
> > +	.set_power = sdhci_set_power_and_bus_voltage,
> > +	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> > +	.reset = sdhci_reset,
> > +	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> > +};
> > +
> >   static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_7216 = {
> >   	.set_clock = sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock,
> >   	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> > @@ -214,6 +270,11 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0 = {
> >   	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling,
> >   };
> > 
> > +static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_2712 = {
> > +	.cfginit = sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712,
> > +	.ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712,
> > +};
> > +
> >   static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_7425 = {
> >   	.flags = BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_NO_64BIT |
> >   	BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_BROKEN_TIMEOUT,
> > @@ -238,6 +299,7 @@ static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_74165b0 = {
> >   };
> > 
> >   static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused sdhci_brcm_of_match[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2712-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_2712 },
> >   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7425-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7425 },
> >   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7445 },
> >   	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7216-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7216 },
> > @@ -370,6 +432,9 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   	    (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES))
> >   		host->mmc_host_ops.hs400_enhanced_strobe = match_priv->hs400es;
> > 
> > +	if (match_priv->cfginit)
> > +		match_priv->cfginit(host);
> > +
> I'm not sure this is the right place to call cfginit.
> sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712 retrives the current controller base clock,
> but at the end of  sdhci_brcmstb_probe this clock frequency could be
> adjusted by the device property "clock-frequency". So i'm not sure this
> is intended.

I've tried to interpret the meaning of those two clocks since unfortunately I don't
own the datasheet for any of the platforms involved, so please take the following
as the result of my own (possibly wrong) intuition and (mostly wild) guessing.

The main clock is 'sw_sdio' while 'sdio_freq' is optional and the latter seems to be
orthogonal to the former.
While sw_sdio is mostly used for SD storage card, sdio_freq seems more related to
SDIO family of cards (wifi, gps, camera, etc) for which you could specify a particular
(and higher) base frequency.
Unfortunately I wasn't able to find any reference to sdio_freq in current devicetree
so it's probably only specific to custom appliances: to be honest I'm not even sure
that BCM2712 is supporting that improved clock source.  Also, from the following lines
at the end of cfginit function:

/* Guesstimate the timer frequency (controller base clock) */
base_clk_mhz = max_t(u32, clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk) / (1000 * 1000), 1);
reg = SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL | base_clk_mhz;
writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY);

judging from the name of SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY register, I'd guess that it relates
to some Command Queue (timeout?) setting so it's probably only important if CQE is
enabled specifying 'supports-cqe' property, which is not in current devicetree (nor
in  downstream one). If this is the case it's mostly a performance improvement, and
as such something that we are not necessarily interested in right now since this
patchset adds just minimal boot support. I would then drop those lines, as we could
just reintroduce them if they need be once we have a better understanding of that
specific register and/if the cqe support will be enabled. As a matter of fact those
lines are not working as expected in any case since pltfm_host->clk is set at the
very end of sdhci_brcmstb_probe() while the cfginit function is invoked much earlier.
The result is that right now the value set ito SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY register is always
equal to 1MHz. Further testing reveals that it is indeed working fine even with those
lines dropped, so I would deem that code as unnecessary for this early patchset.
Is it a viable solution?

Many thanks,
Andrea

> >   	/*
> >   	 * Supply the existing CAPS, but clear the UHS modes. This
> >   	 * will allow these modes to be specified by device tree
>
Stefan Wahren May 25, 2024, 6:59 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi Andrea,

Am 25.05.24 um 07:39 schrieb Andrea della Porta:
> On 14:26 Tue 21 May     , Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> Am 21.05.24 um 10:35 schrieb Andrea della Porta:
>>> Broadcom BCM2712 SoC has an SDHCI card controller using the SDIO CFG
>>> register block present on other STB chips. Add support for BCM2712
>>> SD capabilities of this chipset.
>>> The silicon is SD Express capable but this driver port does not currently
>>> include that feature yet.
>>> Based on downstream driver by raspberry foundation maintained kernel.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
>>> index 9053526fa212..b349262da36e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,21 @@
>>>
>>>    #define SDHCI_ARASAN_CQE_BASE_ADDR		0x200
>>>
>>> +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY			0x4c
>>> +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL		GENMASK(13, 12)
>>> +
>>> +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL				0x0
>>> +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN		BIT(31)
>>> +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV		BIT(30)
>>> +
>>> +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE			0x1ac
>>> +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE	BIT(31)
>>> +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE		BIT(0)
>>> +
>>> +#define MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK	(MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_2V | MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_8V)
>>> +/* Select all SD UHS type I SDR speed above 50MB/s */
>>> +#define MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK	(MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104)
>>> +
>>>    struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
>>>    	void __iomem *cfg_regs;
>>>    	unsigned int flags;
>>> @@ -38,6 +53,7 @@ struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
>>>    };
>>>
>>>    struct brcmstb_match_priv {
>>> +	void (*cfginit)(struct sdhci_host *host);
>>>    	void (*hs400es)(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios);
>>>    	struct sdhci_ops *ops;
>>>    	const unsigned int flags;
>>> @@ -168,6 +184,38 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
>>>    	sdhci_writew(host, ctrl_2, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +static void sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712(struct sdhci_host *host)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>>> +	struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *brcmstb_priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>>> +	u32 reg, base_clk_mhz;
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * If we support a speed that requires tuning,
>>> +	 * then select the delay line PHY as the clock source.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK) || (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK)) {
>>> +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
>>> +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE;
>>> +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE;
>>> +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) ||
>>> +	    (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)) {
>>> +		/* Force presence */
>>> +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
>>> +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV;
>>> +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN;
>>> +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	/* Guesstimate the timer frequency (controller base clock) */
>>> +	base_clk_mhz = max_t(u32, clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk) / (1000 * 1000), 1);
>>> +	reg = SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL | base_clk_mhz;
>>> +	writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY);
>> This part assumes the clock isn't changed afterwards, see below ...
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static void sdhci_brcmstb_dumpregs(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>>>    {
>>>    	sdhci_dumpregs(mmc_priv(mmc));
>>> @@ -200,6 +248,14 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops = {
>>>    	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
>>>    };
>>>
>>> +static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712 = {
>>> +	.set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
>>> +	.set_power = sdhci_set_power_and_bus_voltage,
>>> +	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
>>> +	.reset = sdhci_reset,
>>> +	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>    static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_7216 = {
>>>    	.set_clock = sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock,
>>>    	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
>>> @@ -214,6 +270,11 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0 = {
>>>    	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling,
>>>    };
>>>
>>> +static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_2712 = {
>>> +	.cfginit = sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712,
>>> +	.ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>    static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_7425 = {
>>>    	.flags = BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_NO_64BIT |
>>>    	BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_BROKEN_TIMEOUT,
>>> @@ -238,6 +299,7 @@ static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_74165b0 = {
>>>    };
>>>
>>>    static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused sdhci_brcm_of_match[] = {
>>> +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2712-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_2712 },
>>>    	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7425-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7425 },
>>>    	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7445 },
>>>    	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7216-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7216 },
>>> @@ -370,6 +432,9 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>    	    (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES))
>>>    		host->mmc_host_ops.hs400_enhanced_strobe = match_priv->hs400es;
>>>
>>> +	if (match_priv->cfginit)
>>> +		match_priv->cfginit(host);
>>> +
>> I'm not sure this is the right place to call cfginit.
>> sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712 retrives the current controller base clock,
>> but at the end of  sdhci_brcmstb_probe this clock frequency could be
>> adjusted by the device property "clock-frequency". So i'm not sure this
>> is intended.
> I've tried to interpret the meaning of those two clocks since unfortunately I don't
> own the datasheet for any of the platforms involved, so please take the following
> as the result of my own (possibly wrong) intuition and (mostly wild) guessing.
>
> The main clock is 'sw_sdio' while 'sdio_freq' is optional and the latter seems to be
> orthogonal to the former.
> While sw_sdio is mostly used for SD storage card, sdio_freq seems more related to
> SDIO family of cards (wifi, gps, camera, etc) for which you could specify a particular
> (and higher) base frequency.
> Unfortunately I wasn't able to find any reference to sdio_freq in current devicetree
> so it's probably only specific to custom appliances: to be honest I'm not even sure
> that BCM2712 is supporting that improved clock source.  Also, from the following lines
> at the end of cfginit function:
>
> /* Guesstimate the timer frequency (controller base clock) */
> base_clk_mhz = max_t(u32, clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk) / (1000 * 1000), 1);
> reg = SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL | base_clk_mhz;
> writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY);
>
> judging from the name of SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY register, I'd guess that it relates
> to some Command Queue (timeout?) setting so it's probably only important if CQE is
> enabled specifying 'supports-cqe' property, which is not in current devicetree (nor
> in  downstream one). If this is the case it's mostly a performance improvement, and
> as such something that we are not necessarily interested in right now since this
> patchset adds just minimal boot support. I would then drop those lines, as we could
> just reintroduce them if they need be once we have a better understanding of that
> specific register and/if the cqe support will be enabled. As a matter of fact those
> lines are not working as expected in any case since pltfm_host->clk is set at the
> very end of sdhci_brcmstb_probe() while the cfginit function is invoked much earlier.
> The result is that right now the value set ito SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY register is always
> equal to 1MHz. Further testing reveals that it is indeed working fine even with those
> lines dropped, so I would deem that code as unnecessary for this early patchset.
> Is it a viable solution?
I don't have any knowledge about this hardware, so my opinion based on
your good investigations. But i would be fine with this.

Just to make it clear, this works with and without U-Boot in the bootchain?

Thanks
>
> Many thanks,
> Andrea
>
>>>    	/*
>>>    	 * Supply the existing CAPS, but clear the UHS modes. This
>>>    	 * will allow these modes to be specified by device tree
Andrea della Porta May 27, 2024, 7:27 a.m. UTC | #6
Hi Stefan,

On 08:59 Sat 25 May     , Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
> 
> Am 25.05.24 um 07:39 schrieb Andrea della Porta:
> > On 14:26 Tue 21 May     , Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > Hi Andrea,
> > > 
> > > Am 21.05.24 um 10:35 schrieb Andrea della Porta:
> > > > Broadcom BCM2712 SoC has an SDHCI card controller using the SDIO CFG
> > > > register block present on other STB chips. Add support for BCM2712
> > > > SD capabilities of this chipset.
> > > > The silicon is SD Express capable but this driver port does not currently
> > > > include that feature yet.
> > > > Based on downstream driver by raspberry foundation maintained kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >    1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> > > > index 9053526fa212..b349262da36e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> > > > @@ -30,6 +30,21 @@
> > > > 
> > > >    #define SDHCI_ARASAN_CQE_BASE_ADDR		0x200
> > > > 
> > > > +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY			0x4c
> > > > +#define SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL		GENMASK(13, 12)
> > > > +
> > > > +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL				0x0
> > > > +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN		BIT(31)
> > > > +#define SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV		BIT(30)
> > > > +
> > > > +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE			0x1ac
> > > > +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE	BIT(31)
> > > > +#define SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE		BIT(0)
> > > > +
> > > > +#define MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK	(MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_2V | MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_8V)
> > > > +/* Select all SD UHS type I SDR speed above 50MB/s */
> > > > +#define MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK	(MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104)
> > > > +
> > > >    struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
> > > >    	void __iomem *cfg_regs;
> > > >    	unsigned int flags;
> > > > @@ -38,6 +53,7 @@ struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
> > > >    };
> > > > 
> > > >    struct brcmstb_match_priv {
> > > > +	void (*cfginit)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> > > >    	void (*hs400es)(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios);
> > > >    	struct sdhci_ops *ops;
> > > >    	const unsigned int flags;
> > > > @@ -168,6 +184,38 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
> > > >    	sdhci_writew(host, ctrl_2, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> > > >    }
> > > > 
> > > > +static void sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712(struct sdhci_host *host)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> > > > +	struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *brcmstb_priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> > > > +	u32 reg, base_clk_mhz;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * If we support a speed that requires tuning,
> > > > +	 * then select the delay line PHY as the clock source.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_UHS_I_SDR_MASK) || (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP_HSE_MASK)) {
> > > > +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> > > > +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_ENABLE;
> > > > +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE_STRAP_OVERRIDE;
> > > > +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_MAX_50MHZ_MODE);
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) ||
> > > > +	    (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)) {
> > > > +		/* Force presence */
> > > > +		reg = readl(brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> > > > +		reg &= ~SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_LEV;
> > > > +		reg |= SDIO_CFG_CTRL_SDCD_N_TEST_EN;
> > > > +		writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CTRL);
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* Guesstimate the timer frequency (controller base clock) */
> > > > +	base_clk_mhz = max_t(u32, clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk) / (1000 * 1000), 1);
> > > > +	reg = SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL | base_clk_mhz;
> > > > +	writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY);
> > > This part assumes the clock isn't changed afterwards, see below ...
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >    static void sdhci_brcmstb_dumpregs(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	sdhci_dumpregs(mmc_priv(mmc));
> > > > @@ -200,6 +248,14 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops = {
> > > >    	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> > > >    };
> > > > 
> > > > +static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712 = {
> > > > +	.set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
> > > > +	.set_power = sdhci_set_power_and_bus_voltage,
> > > > +	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> > > > +	.reset = sdhci_reset,
> > > > +	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > >    static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_7216 = {
> > > >    	.set_clock = sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock,
> > > >    	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> > > > @@ -214,6 +270,11 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0 = {
> > > >    	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling,
> > > >    };
> > > > 
> > > > +static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_2712 = {
> > > > +	.cfginit = sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712,
> > > > +	.ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_2712,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > >    static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_7425 = {
> > > >    	.flags = BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_NO_64BIT |
> > > >    	BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_BROKEN_TIMEOUT,
> > > > @@ -238,6 +299,7 @@ static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_74165b0 = {
> > > >    };
> > > > 
> > > >    static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused sdhci_brcm_of_match[] = {
> > > > +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2712-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_2712 },
> > > >    	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7425-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7425 },
> > > >    	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7445 },
> > > >    	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm7216-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7216 },
> > > > @@ -370,6 +432,9 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > >    	    (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES))
> > > >    		host->mmc_host_ops.hs400_enhanced_strobe = match_priv->hs400es;
> > > > 
> > > > +	if (match_priv->cfginit)
> > > > +		match_priv->cfginit(host);
> > > > +
> > > I'm not sure this is the right place to call cfginit.
> > > sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712 retrives the current controller base clock,
> > > but at the end of  sdhci_brcmstb_probe this clock frequency could be
> > > adjusted by the device property "clock-frequency". So i'm not sure this
> > > is intended.
> > I've tried to interpret the meaning of those two clocks since unfortunately I don't
> > own the datasheet for any of the platforms involved, so please take the following
> > as the result of my own (possibly wrong) intuition and (mostly wild) guessing.
> > 
> > The main clock is 'sw_sdio' while 'sdio_freq' is optional and the latter seems to be
> > orthogonal to the former.
> > While sw_sdio is mostly used for SD storage card, sdio_freq seems more related to
> > SDIO family of cards (wifi, gps, camera, etc) for which you could specify a particular
> > (and higher) base frequency.
> > Unfortunately I wasn't able to find any reference to sdio_freq in current devicetree
> > so it's probably only specific to custom appliances: to be honest I'm not even sure
> > that BCM2712 is supporting that improved clock source.  Also, from the following lines
> > at the end of cfginit function:
> > 
> > /* Guesstimate the timer frequency (controller base clock) */
> > base_clk_mhz = max_t(u32, clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk) / (1000 * 1000), 1);
> > reg = SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY_FMUL | base_clk_mhz;
> > writel(reg, brcmstb_priv->cfg_regs + SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY);
> > 
> > judging from the name of SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY register, I'd guess that it relates
> > to some Command Queue (timeout?) setting so it's probably only important if CQE is
> > enabled specifying 'supports-cqe' property, which is not in current devicetree (nor
> > in  downstream one). If this is the case it's mostly a performance improvement, and
> > as such something that we are not necessarily interested in right now since this
> > patchset adds just minimal boot support. I would then drop those lines, as we could
> > just reintroduce them if they need be once we have a better understanding of that
> > specific register and/if the cqe support will be enabled. As a matter of fact those
> > lines are not working as expected in any case since pltfm_host->clk is set at the
> > very end of sdhci_brcmstb_probe() while the cfginit function is invoked much earlier.
> > The result is that right now the value set ito SDIO_CFG_CQ_CAPABILITY register is always
> > equal to 1MHz. Further testing reveals that it is indeed working fine even with those
> > lines dropped, so I would deem that code as unnecessary for this early patchset.
> > Is it a viable solution?
> I don't have any knowledge about this hardware, so my opinion based on
> your good investigations. But i would be fine with this.
> 
> Just to make it clear, this works with and without U-Boot in the bootchain?

Yes, I confirm it works with both.

Thanks,
Andrea

> 
> Thanks
> > 
> > Many thanks,
> > Andrea
> > 
> > > >    	/*
> > > >    	 * Supply the existing CAPS, but clear the UHS modes. This
> > > >    	 * will allow these modes to be specified by device tree
>