Message ID | 20240426154125.235977-1-larysa.zaremba@intel.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Anthony Nguyen |
Headers | show |
Series | [iwl-net] idpf: Interpret .set_channels() input differently | expand |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 8:41 AM > To: Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; intel-wired- > lan@lists.osuosl.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Zaremba, Larysa <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>; Brady, Alan > <alan.brady@intel.com>; Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>; > Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>; Tantilov, Emil S > <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>; Linga, Pavan Kumar > <pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>; Hay, Joshua A <joshua.a.hay@intel.com>; > Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>; Bagnucki, Igor > <igor.bagnucki@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: Interpret .set_channels() input differently > > Unlike ice, idpf does not check, if user has requested at least 1 combined > channel. Instead, it relies on a check in the core code. Unfortunately, the > check does not trigger for us because of the hacky .set_channels() > interpretation logic that is not consistent with the core code. > > This naturally leads to user being able to trigger a crash with an invalid > input. This is how: > > 1. ethtool -l <IFNAME> -> combined: 40 > 2. ethtool -L <IFNAME> rx 0 tx 0 > combined number is not specified, so command becomes {rx_count = 0, > tx_count = 0, combined_count = 40}. > 3. ethnl_set_channels checks, if there is at least 1 RX and 1 TX channel, > comparing (combined_count + rx_count) and (combined_count + tx_count) > to zero. Obviously, (40 + 0) is greater than zero, so the core code > deems the input OK. > 4. idpf interprets `rx 0 tx 0` as 0 channels and tries to proceed with such > configuration. > > The issue has to be solved fundamentally, as current logic is also known to > cause AF_XDP problems in ice [0]. > > Interpret the command in a way that is more consistent with ethtool > manual [1] (--show-channels and --set-channels) and new ice logic. > > Considering that in the idpf driver only the difference between RX and TX > queues forms dedicated channels, change the correct way to set number of > channels to: > > ethtool -L <IFNAME> combined 10 /* For symmetric queues */ > ethtool -L <IFNAME> combined 8 tx 2 rx 0 /* For asymmetric queues */ > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240418095857.2827-1- > larysa.zaremba@intel.com/ > [1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/ethtool.8.html > > Fixes: 02cbfba1add5 ("idpf: add ethtool callbacks") > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Igor Bagnucki <igor.bagnucki@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> > --- > .../net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c | 21 ++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c > index 986d429d1175..1cf3067a9c31 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <krishneil.k.singh@intel.com>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 05:41:22PM +0200, Larysa Zaremba wrote: > Unlike ice, idpf does not check, if user has requested at least 1 combined > channel. Instead, it relies on a check in the core code. Unfortunately, the > check does not trigger for us because of the hacky .set_channels() > interpretation logic that is not consistent with the core code. > > This naturally leads to user being able to trigger a crash with an invalid > input. This is how: > > 1. ethtool -l <IFNAME> -> combined: 40 > 2. ethtool -L <IFNAME> rx 0 tx 0 > combined number is not specified, so command becomes {rx_count = 0, > tx_count = 0, combined_count = 40}. > 3. ethnl_set_channels checks, if there is at least 1 RX and 1 TX channel, > comparing (combined_count + rx_count) and (combined_count + tx_count) > to zero. Obviously, (40 + 0) is greater than zero, so the core code > deems the input OK. > 4. idpf interprets `rx 0 tx 0` as 0 channels and tries to proceed with such > configuration. > > The issue has to be solved fundamentally, as current logic is also known to > cause AF_XDP problems in ice [0]. > > Interpret the command in a way that is more consistent with ethtool > manual [1] (--show-channels and --set-channels) and new ice logic. > > Considering that in the idpf driver only the difference between RX and TX > queues forms dedicated channels, change the correct way to set number of > channels to: > > ethtool -L <IFNAME> combined 10 /* For symmetric queues */ > ethtool -L <IFNAME> combined 8 tx 2 rx 0 /* For asymmetric queues */ > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240418095857.2827-1-larysa.zaremba@intel.com/ > [1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/ethtool.8.html > > Fixes: 02cbfba1add5 ("idpf: add ethtool callbacks") > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Igor Bagnucki <igor.bagnucki@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c index 986d429d1175..1cf3067a9c31 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c @@ -222,14 +222,19 @@ static int idpf_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev, struct ethtool_channels *ch) { struct idpf_vport_config *vport_config; - u16 combined, num_txq, num_rxq; unsigned int num_req_tx_q; unsigned int num_req_rx_q; struct idpf_vport *vport; + u16 num_txq, num_rxq; struct device *dev; int err = 0; u16 idx; + if (ch->rx_count && ch->tx_count) { + netdev_err(netdev, "Dedicated RX or TX channels cannot be used simultaneously\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + idpf_vport_ctrl_lock(netdev); vport = idpf_netdev_to_vport(netdev); @@ -239,20 +244,6 @@ static int idpf_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev, num_txq = vport_config->user_config.num_req_tx_qs; num_rxq = vport_config->user_config.num_req_rx_qs; - combined = min(num_txq, num_rxq); - - /* these checks are for cases where user didn't specify a particular - * value on cmd line but we get non-zero value anyway via - * get_channels(); look at ethtool.c in ethtool repository (the user - * space part), particularly, do_schannels() routine - */ - if (ch->combined_count == combined) - ch->combined_count = 0; - if (ch->combined_count && ch->rx_count == num_rxq - combined) - ch->rx_count = 0; - if (ch->combined_count && ch->tx_count == num_txq - combined) - ch->tx_count = 0; - num_req_tx_q = ch->combined_count + ch->tx_count; num_req_rx_q = ch->combined_count + ch->rx_count;