Message ID | 20240212174822.77734-5-christophe.kerello@foss.st.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Add MP25 FMC2 support | expand |
On 12/02/2024 18:48, Christophe Kerello wrote: > Add MP25 SOC support. RNB and NWAIT signals are differentiated. s/SOC/SoC/ everywhere > The way you split patches is a bit odd. Shall we understand that this patch is the complete MP25 SoC support? Best regards, Krzysztof
On 2/13/24 08:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 12/02/2024 18:48, Christophe Kerello wrote: >> Add MP25 SOC support. RNB and NWAIT signals are differentiated. > Hi Krzysztof, > s/SOC/SoC/ > everywhere Ok. > >> > > The way you split patches is a bit odd. Shall we understand that this > patch is the complete MP25 SoC support? > No, it is not the full support but the way the FMC2 IP has been integrated in this SoC. As patch 5 has to be written, I am going to merge this patch and patch 5 in one patch. I am going to follow your recommendation and use the platform data to distinguish between each variant. Regards, Christophe Kerello. > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
diff --git a/drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c b/drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c index 5f82686689ee..d79dcb6c239a 100644 --- a/drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c +++ b/drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c @@ -1203,11 +1203,19 @@ static const struct stm32_fmc2_ebi_data stm32_fmc2_ebi_mp1_data = { .rnb_for_nand = false, }; +static const struct stm32_fmc2_ebi_data stm32_fmc2_ebi_mp25_data = { + .rnb_for_nand = true, +}; + static const struct of_device_id stm32_fmc2_ebi_match[] = { { .compatible = "st,stm32mp1-fmc2-ebi", .data = &stm32_fmc2_ebi_mp1_data, }, + { + .compatible = "st,stm32mp25-fmc2-ebi", + .data = &stm32_fmc2_ebi_mp25_data, + }, {} }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32_fmc2_ebi_match);
Add MP25 SOC support. RNB and NWAIT signals are differentiated. Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com> --- drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)