Message ID | 20240118195356.133391-6-dregan@broadcom.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: driver and doc updates | expand |
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:53:51AM -0800, dregan@broadcom.com wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c > index 3e2f3b79788d..e97e13ae246c 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c > @@ -26,6 +26,18 @@ enum { > BCMBCA_CTLRDY = BIT(4), > }; > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) > +#define ALIGN_REQ 8 > +#else > +#define ALIGN_REQ 4 > +#endif > + > +static inline bool bcmbca_nand_is_buf_aligned(void *flash_cache, void *buffer) > +{ > + return IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)buffer, ALIGN_REQ) && > + IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)flash_cache, ALIGN_REQ); > +} > + > static bool bcmbca_nand_intc_ack(struct brcmnand_soc *soc) > { > struct bcmbca_nand_soc *priv = > @@ -56,6 +68,20 @@ static void bcmbca_nand_intc_set(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool en) > brcmnand_writel(val, mmio); > } > > +static void bcmbca_read_data_bus(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, > + void __iomem *flash_cache, u32 *buffer, int fc_words) > +{ > + /* > + * memcpy can do unaligned aligned access depending on source > + * and dest address, which is incompatible with nand cache. Fallback > + * to the memcpy for io version > + */ > + if (bcmbca_nand_is_buf_aligned((void *)flash_cache, buffer)) > + memcpy((void *)buffer, (void *)flash_cache, fc_words * 4); > + else > + memcpy_fromio((void *)buffer, flash_cache, fc_words * 4); > +} This comment is confusing or maybe the if statement is reversed... We're falling back to memcpy_fromio() for the unaligned accesses but the comment says we're falling back to memcpy(). regards, dan carpenter
Hi, On 01/18/2024 09:36 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:53:51AM -0800, dregan@broadcom.com wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c >> index 3e2f3b79788d..e97e13ae246c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c >> @@ -26,6 +26,18 @@ enum { >> BCMBCA_CTLRDY = BIT(4), >> }; >> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) >> +#define ALIGN_REQ 8 >> +#else >> +#define ALIGN_REQ 4 >> +#endif >> + >> +static inline bool bcmbca_nand_is_buf_aligned(void *flash_cache, void *buffer) >> +{ >> + return IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)buffer, ALIGN_REQ) && >> + IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)flash_cache, ALIGN_REQ); >> +} >> + >> static bool bcmbca_nand_intc_ack(struct brcmnand_soc *soc) >> { >> struct bcmbca_nand_soc *priv = >> @@ -56,6 +68,20 @@ static void bcmbca_nand_intc_set(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool en) >> brcmnand_writel(val, mmio); >> } >> >> +static void bcmbca_read_data_bus(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, >> + void __iomem *flash_cache, u32 *buffer, int fc_words) >> +{ >> + /* >> + * memcpy can do unaligned aligned access depending on source >> + * and dest address, which is incompatible with nand cache. Fallback >> + * to the memcpy for io version >> + */ >> + if (bcmbca_nand_is_buf_aligned((void *)flash_cache, buffer)) >> + memcpy((void *)buffer, (void *)flash_cache, fc_words * 4); >> + else >> + memcpy_fromio((void *)buffer, flash_cache, fc_words * 4); >> +} > > This comment is confusing or maybe the if statement is reversed... > We're falling back to memcpy_fromio() for the unaligned accesses but the > comment says we're falling back to memcpy(). > Yes that's a typo. Fallback to memcpy_fromio when unalgined. Will update the comments in v3. Thanks! > regards, > dan carpenter >
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c index 3e2f3b79788d..e97e13ae246c 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c @@ -26,6 +26,18 @@ enum { BCMBCA_CTLRDY = BIT(4), }; +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) +#define ALIGN_REQ 8 +#else +#define ALIGN_REQ 4 +#endif + +static inline bool bcmbca_nand_is_buf_aligned(void *flash_cache, void *buffer) +{ + return IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)buffer, ALIGN_REQ) && + IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)flash_cache, ALIGN_REQ); +} + static bool bcmbca_nand_intc_ack(struct brcmnand_soc *soc) { struct bcmbca_nand_soc *priv = @@ -56,6 +68,20 @@ static void bcmbca_nand_intc_set(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool en) brcmnand_writel(val, mmio); } +static void bcmbca_read_data_bus(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, + void __iomem *flash_cache, u32 *buffer, int fc_words) +{ + /* + * memcpy can do unaligned aligned access depending on source + * and dest address, which is incompatible with nand cache. Fallback + * to the memcpy for io version + */ + if (bcmbca_nand_is_buf_aligned((void *)flash_cache, buffer)) + memcpy((void *)buffer, (void *)flash_cache, fc_words * 4); + else + memcpy_fromio((void *)buffer, flash_cache, fc_words * 4); +} + static int bcmbca_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; @@ -73,6 +99,7 @@ static int bcmbca_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) soc->ctlrdy_ack = bcmbca_nand_intc_ack; soc->ctlrdy_set_enabled = bcmbca_nand_intc_set; + soc->read_data_bus = bcmbca_read_data_bus; return brcmnand_probe(pdev, soc); } diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c index 8faca43ae1ff..73fdf7ce21aa 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c @@ -851,6 +851,20 @@ static inline u32 edu_readl(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl, return brcmnand_readl(ctrl->edu_base + offs); } +static inline void brcmnand_read_data_bus(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl, + void __iomem *flash_cache, u32 *buffer, int fc_words) +{ + struct brcmnand_soc *soc = ctrl->soc; + int i; + + if (soc->read_data_bus) { + soc->read_data_bus(soc, flash_cache, buffer, fc_words); + } else { + for (i = 0; i < fc_words; i++) + buffer[i] = brcmnand_read_fc(ctrl, i); + } +} + static void brcmnand_clear_ecc_addr(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl) { @@ -1975,7 +1989,7 @@ static int brcmnand_read_by_pio(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, { struct brcmnand_host *host = nand_get_controller_data(chip); struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl; - int i, j, ret = 0; + int i, ret = 0; brcmnand_clear_ecc_addr(ctrl); @@ -1988,8 +2002,8 @@ static int brcmnand_read_by_pio(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, if (likely(buf)) { brcmnand_soc_data_bus_prepare(ctrl->soc, false); - for (j = 0; j < FC_WORDS; j++, buf++) - *buf = brcmnand_read_fc(ctrl, j); + brcmnand_read_data_bus(ctrl, ctrl->nand_fc, buf, FC_WORDS); + buf += FC_WORDS; brcmnand_soc_data_bus_unprepare(ctrl->soc, false); } diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h index 928114c0be5e..7261a69989fe 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ struct brcmnand_soc { void (*ctlrdy_set_enabled)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool en); void (*prepare_data_bus)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool prepare, bool is_param); + void (*read_data_bus)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, void __iomem *flash_cache, + u32 *buffer, int fc_words); const struct brcmnand_io_ops *ops; };