Message ID | e3179721-0e0a-4790-b244-55c95465ecc3@linux.ibm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [rs6000] Clean up pre-checking of expand_block_compare | expand |
Hi, on 2023/12/11 10:54, HAO CHEN GUI wrote: > Hi, > This patch cleans up pre-checking of expand_block_compare. It does > 1. Assert only P7 above can enter this function as it's already guard > by the expand. > 2. Return false when optimizing for size. > 3. Remove P7 CPU test as only P7 above can enter this function and P7 > LE is excluded by targetm.slow_unaligned_access. > > Bootstrapped and tested on x86 and powerpc64-linux BE and LE with no > regressions. Is this OK for trunk? > > Thanks > Gui Haochen > > ChangeLog > rs6000: Clean up pre-checking of expand_block_compare > > gcc/ > * gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-string.cc (expand_block_compare): Assert > only P7 above can enter this function. Return false when it's > optimized for size. Remove P7 CPU test as only P7 above can enter > this function and P7 LE is excluded by the checking of > targetm.slow_unaligned_access on word_mode. > > gcc/testsuite/ > * gcc.target/powerpc/memcmp_for_size.c: New. > > > patch.diff > diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-string.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-string.cc > index d4030854b2a..dff69e90d0c 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-string.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-string.cc > @@ -1946,6 +1946,15 @@ expand_block_compare_gpr(unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT bytes, unsigned int base_align, > bool > expand_block_compare (rtx operands[]) > { > + gcc_assert (TARGET_POPCNTD); Nit: Add one comment on why we expect TARGET_POPCNTD here. > + > + if (optimize_insn_for_size_p ()) > + return false; > + > + /* Allow this param to shut off all expansion. */ > + if (rs6000_block_compare_inline_limit == 0) > + return false; > + > rtx target = operands[0]; > rtx orig_src1 = operands[1]; > rtx orig_src2 = operands[2]; Nit: Move these below closer to their uses. > @@ -1959,23 +1968,9 @@ expand_block_compare (rtx operands[]) > if (TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_POWERPC64) > return false; > > - bool isP7 = (rs6000_tune == PROCESSOR_POWER7); > - > - /* Allow this param to shut off all expansion. */ > - if (rs6000_block_compare_inline_limit == 0) > - return false; > - > - /* targetm.slow_unaligned_access -- don't do unaligned stuff. > - However slow_unaligned_access returns true on P7 even though the > - performance of this code is good there. */ > - if (!isP7 > - && (targetm.slow_unaligned_access (word_mode, MEM_ALIGN (orig_src1)) > - || targetm.slow_unaligned_access (word_mode, MEM_ALIGN (orig_src2)))) > - return false; > - > - /* Unaligned l*brx traps on P7 so don't do this. However this should > - not affect much because LE isn't really supported on P7 anyway. */ > - if (isP7 && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN) IMHO we'd better to keep this check, since users are able to specify no-strict-align on P7, that is we can't guarantee it's always strict-align and can be rejected by targetm.slow_unaligned_access below. > + /* targetm.slow_unaligned_access -- don't do unaligned stuff. */ > + if (targetm.slow_unaligned_access (word_mode, MEM_ALIGN (orig_src1)) > + || targetm.slow_unaligned_access (word_mode, MEM_ALIGN (orig_src2))) > return false; This change makes us respect targetm.slow_unaligned_access more, I like it. > > /* If this is not a fixed size compare, try generating loop code and > @@ -2023,14 +2018,6 @@ expand_block_compare (rtx operands[]) > if (!IN_RANGE (bytes, 1, max_bytes)) > return expand_compare_loop (operands); > > - /* The code generated for p7 and older is not faster than glibc > - memcmp if alignment is small and length is not short, so bail > - out to avoid those conditions. */ > - if (!TARGET_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_FIXEDPOINT > - && ((base_align == 1 && bytes > 16) > - || (base_align == 2 && bytes > 32))) > - return false; Why did you change this? I didn't see any explanation above or am I missing? > - > rtx final_label = NULL; > > if (use_vec) > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/memcmp_for_size.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/memcmp_for_size.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..c7e853ad593 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/memcmp_for_size.c Nit: As the comment in another thread, it can be block-cmp-3.c or similar. BR, Kewen > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-Os" } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mb[l]? memcmp\M} 1 } } */ > + > +int foo (const char* s1, const char* s2) > +{ > + return __builtin_memcmp (s1, s2, 4); > +}
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-string.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-string.cc index d4030854b2a..dff69e90d0c 100644 --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-string.cc +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-string.cc @@ -1946,6 +1946,15 @@ expand_block_compare_gpr(unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT bytes, unsigned int base_align, bool expand_block_compare (rtx operands[]) { + gcc_assert (TARGET_POPCNTD); + + if (optimize_insn_for_size_p ()) + return false; + + /* Allow this param to shut off all expansion. */ + if (rs6000_block_compare_inline_limit == 0) + return false; + rtx target = operands[0]; rtx orig_src1 = operands[1]; rtx orig_src2 = operands[2]; @@ -1959,23 +1968,9 @@ expand_block_compare (rtx operands[]) if (TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_POWERPC64) return false; - bool isP7 = (rs6000_tune == PROCESSOR_POWER7); - - /* Allow this param to shut off all expansion. */ - if (rs6000_block_compare_inline_limit == 0) - return false; - - /* targetm.slow_unaligned_access -- don't do unaligned stuff. - However slow_unaligned_access returns true on P7 even though the - performance of this code is good there. */ - if (!isP7 - && (targetm.slow_unaligned_access (word_mode, MEM_ALIGN (orig_src1)) - || targetm.slow_unaligned_access (word_mode, MEM_ALIGN (orig_src2)))) - return false; - - /* Unaligned l*brx traps on P7 so don't do this. However this should - not affect much because LE isn't really supported on P7 anyway. */ - if (isP7 && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN) + /* targetm.slow_unaligned_access -- don't do unaligned stuff. */ + if (targetm.slow_unaligned_access (word_mode, MEM_ALIGN (orig_src1)) + || targetm.slow_unaligned_access (word_mode, MEM_ALIGN (orig_src2))) return false; /* If this is not a fixed size compare, try generating loop code and @@ -2023,14 +2018,6 @@ expand_block_compare (rtx operands[]) if (!IN_RANGE (bytes, 1, max_bytes)) return expand_compare_loop (operands); - /* The code generated for p7 and older is not faster than glibc - memcmp if alignment is small and length is not short, so bail - out to avoid those conditions. */ - if (!TARGET_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_FIXEDPOINT - && ((base_align == 1 && bytes > 16) - || (base_align == 2 && bytes > 32))) - return false; - rtx final_label = NULL; if (use_vec) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/memcmp_for_size.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/memcmp_for_size.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c7e853ad593 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/memcmp_for_size.c @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-Os" } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mb[l]? memcmp\M} 1 } } */ + +int foo (const char* s1, const char* s2) +{ + return __builtin_memcmp (s1, s2, 4); +}