@@ -937,12 +937,13 @@ struct set *netlink_delinearize_set(struct netlink_ctx *ctx,
const struct nftnl_udata *ud[NFTNL_UDATA_SET_MAX + 1] = {};
enum byteorder keybyteorder = BYTEORDER_INVALID;
enum byteorder databyteorder = BYTEORDER_INVALID;
- struct expr *typeof_expr_key, *typeof_expr_data;
struct setelem_parse_ctx set_parse_ctx;
const struct datatype *datatype = NULL;
const struct datatype *keytype = NULL;
const struct datatype *dtype2 = NULL;
const struct datatype *dtype = NULL;
+ struct expr *typeof_expr_data = NULL;
+ struct expr *typeof_expr_key = NULL;
const char *udata, *comment = NULL;
uint32_t flags, key, objtype = 0;
uint32_t data_interval = 0;
@@ -951,9 +952,6 @@ struct set *netlink_delinearize_set(struct netlink_ctx *ctx,
uint32_t ulen;
uint32_t klen;
- typeof_expr_key = NULL;
- typeof_expr_data = NULL;
-
if (nftnl_set_is_set(nls, NFTNL_SET_USERDATA)) {
udata = nftnl_set_get_data(nls, NFTNL_SET_USERDATA, &ulen);
if (nftnl_udata_parse(udata, ulen, set_parse_udata_cb, ud) < 0) {
@@ -1043,8 +1041,8 @@ struct set *netlink_delinearize_set(struct netlink_ctx *ctx,
if (set_udata_key_valid(typeof_expr_data, dlen)) {
typeof_expr_data->len = klen;
set->data = typeof_expr_data;
+ typeof_expr_data = NULL;
} else {
- expr_free(typeof_expr_data);
set->data = constant_expr_alloc(&netlink_location,
dtype2,
databyteorder, klen,
@@ -1064,9 +1062,9 @@ struct set *netlink_delinearize_set(struct netlink_ctx *ctx,
if (set_udata_key_valid(typeof_expr_key, klen)) {
set->key = typeof_expr_key;
+ typeof_expr_key = NULL;
set->key_typeof_valid = true;
} else {
- expr_free(typeof_expr_key);
set->key = constant_expr_alloc(&netlink_location, dtype,
keybyteorder, klen,
NULL);
@@ -1100,6 +1098,8 @@ struct set *netlink_delinearize_set(struct netlink_ctx *ctx,
}
out:
+ expr_free(typeof_expr_data);
+ expr_free(typeof_expr_key);
datatype_free(datatype);
datatype_free(keytype);
datatype_free(dtype2);
There are various code paths that return without freeing typeof_expr_data and typeof_expr_key. It's not at all obvious, that there isn't a leak that way. Quite possibly there is a leak. Fix it, or at least make the code more obviously correct. Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com> --- src/netlink.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)