Message ID | 20230607042841.2906576-1-vigneshr@ti.com |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Tom Rini |
Headers | show |
Series | common: spl: Warn about overflow of SRAM stack | expand |
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com> writes: > If early stack usage is exactly same as SIZE_LIMIT_PROVIDE_STACK, then > its most likely to have overflowed beyond this limit and corrupted any > regions beyond stack. Warn about this to the user. > > Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com> > --- > > I found this useful when debugging slient corruption of code/data leading > to random failures post relocation. > > common/spl/spl.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) Reviewed-by: Kamlesh Gurudasani <kamlesh@ti.com>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:58:41AM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > If early stack usage is exactly same as SIZE_LIMIT_PROVIDE_STACK, then > its most likely to have overflowed beyond this limit and corrupted any > regions beyond stack. Warn about this to the user. > > Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com> > --- > > I found this useful when debugging slient corruption of code/data leading > to random failures post relocation. > > common/spl/spl.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c > index 72078a8ebc8e..9a9c8fad7673 100644 > --- a/common/spl/spl.c > +++ b/common/spl/spl.c > @@ -950,6 +950,13 @@ __weak void spl_relocate_stack_check(void) > } > printf("SPL initial stack usage: %lu bytes\n", > CONFIG_VAL(SIZE_LIMIT_PROVIDE_STACK) - i); > + > + /* > + * If we used up all of the SIZE_LIMIT_PROVIDE_STACK, then here is high > + * possibility of stack overflow, warn the user accordingly > + */ > + if (!i) > + printf("SPL possible initial stack overflow detected!!\n"); > #endif Since we're already inside of CONFIG_SPL_SYS_REPORT_STACK_F_USAGE being enabled, we should rework the previous print to include something like "%lu bytes free".
diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c index 72078a8ebc8e..9a9c8fad7673 100644 --- a/common/spl/spl.c +++ b/common/spl/spl.c @@ -950,6 +950,13 @@ __weak void spl_relocate_stack_check(void) } printf("SPL initial stack usage: %lu bytes\n", CONFIG_VAL(SIZE_LIMIT_PROVIDE_STACK) - i); + + /* + * If we used up all of the SIZE_LIMIT_PROVIDE_STACK, then here is high + * possibility of stack overflow, warn the user accordingly + */ + if (!i) + printf("SPL possible initial stack overflow detected!!\n"); #endif }
If early stack usage is exactly same as SIZE_LIMIT_PROVIDE_STACK, then its most likely to have overflowed beyond this limit and corrupted any regions beyond stack. Warn about this to the user. Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com> --- I found this useful when debugging slient corruption of code/data leading to random failures post relocation. common/spl/spl.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)