| Message ID | 20230418150606.1528107-1-robh@kernel.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,pmic-mpp: Fix schema for "qcom,paired" | expand |
On 18/04/2023 17:06, Rob Herring wrote: > The "qcom,paired" schema is all wrong. First, it's a list rather than an > object(dictionary). Second, it is missing a required type. The meta-schema > normally catches this, but schemas under "$defs" was not getting checked. > A fix for that is pending. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml > index 9412b9362328..4c3e9ff82105 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml > @@ -144,8 +144,9 @@ $defs: > enum: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] > > qcom,paired: > - - description: > - Indicates that the pin should be operating in paired mode. > + type: boolean > + description: > + Indicates that the pin should be operating in paired mode. Current Linux implementation uses it as a generic pinconf param pinconf_generic_params which is parsed by: pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config() -> parse_dt_cfg() -> of_property_read_u32() The pinctrl-spmi-mpp.c driver, using this schema, treat it as a bool, but I still wonder how the code will parse bool with of_property_read_u32(). Maybe it should be uint32 with value of 0 and 1? Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:56 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 18/04/2023 17:06, Rob Herring wrote: > > The "qcom,paired" schema is all wrong. First, it's a list rather than an > > object(dictionary). Second, it is missing a required type. The meta-schema > > normally catches this, but schemas under "$defs" was not getting checked. > > A fix for that is pending. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml > > index 9412b9362328..4c3e9ff82105 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml > > @@ -144,8 +144,9 @@ $defs: > > enum: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] > > > > qcom,paired: > > - - description: > > - Indicates that the pin should be operating in paired mode. > > + type: boolean > > + description: > > + Indicates that the pin should be operating in paired mode. > > Current Linux implementation uses it as a generic pinconf param > pinconf_generic_params which is parsed by: > > pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config() -> parse_dt_cfg() -> > of_property_read_u32() > > > The pinctrl-spmi-mpp.c driver, using this schema, treat it as a bool, > but I still wonder how the code will parse bool with > of_property_read_u32(). Maybe it should be uint32 with value of 0 and 1? That should be an error because the length is too short so it should go with some default from the code. Looks like there is no user, though no property could mean keep the default/bootloader setting. Can you sort out which type is really desired here and hopefully we can get rid of the other type. It's not the first case of pinctrl properties with multiple types, but we don't really need more. Rob
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 1:48 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:56 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On 18/04/2023 17:06, Rob Herring wrote: > > > The "qcom,paired" schema is all wrong. First, it's a list rather than an > > > object(dictionary). Second, it is missing a required type. The meta-schema > > > normally catches this, but schemas under "$defs" was not getting checked. > > > A fix for that is pending. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml | 5 +++-- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml > > > index 9412b9362328..4c3e9ff82105 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml > > > @@ -144,8 +144,9 @@ $defs: > > > enum: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] > > > > > > qcom,paired: > > > - - description: > > > - Indicates that the pin should be operating in paired mode. > > > + type: boolean > > > + description: > > > + Indicates that the pin should be operating in paired mode. > > > > Current Linux implementation uses it as a generic pinconf param > > pinconf_generic_params which is parsed by: > > > > pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config() -> parse_dt_cfg() -> > > of_property_read_u32() > > > > > > The pinctrl-spmi-mpp.c driver, using this schema, treat it as a bool, > > but I still wonder how the code will parse bool with > > of_property_read_u32(). Maybe it should be uint32 with value of 0 and 1? > > That should be an error because the length is too short so it should > go with some default from the code. > > Looks like there is no user, though no property could mean keep the > default/bootloader setting. Can you sort out which type is really > desired here and hopefully we can get rid of the other type. It's not > the first case of pinctrl properties with multiple types, but we don't > really need more. Still an issue here. Please sort out what functionality QCom wants here. dtschema (main br) will now throw a warning on it. Rob
On 09/06/2023 23:34, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 1:48 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:56 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski >> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 18/04/2023 17:06, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> The "qcom,paired" schema is all wrong. First, it's a list rather than an >>>> object(dictionary). Second, it is missing a required type. The meta-schema >>>> normally catches this, but schemas under "$defs" was not getting checked. >>>> A fix for that is pending. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml | 5 +++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml >>>> index 9412b9362328..4c3e9ff82105 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml >>>> @@ -144,8 +144,9 @@ $defs: >>>> enum: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] >>>> >>>> qcom,paired: >>>> - - description: >>>> - Indicates that the pin should be operating in paired mode. >>>> + type: boolean >>>> + description: >>>> + Indicates that the pin should be operating in paired mode. >>> >>> Current Linux implementation uses it as a generic pinconf param >>> pinconf_generic_params which is parsed by: >>> >>> pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config() -> parse_dt_cfg() -> >>> of_property_read_u32() >>> >>> >>> The pinctrl-spmi-mpp.c driver, using this schema, treat it as a bool, >>> but I still wonder how the code will parse bool with >>> of_property_read_u32(). Maybe it should be uint32 with value of 0 and 1? >> >> That should be an error because the length is too short so it should >> go with some default from the code. >> >> Looks like there is no user, though no property could mean keep the >> default/bootloader setting. Can you sort out which type is really >> desired here and hopefully we can get rid of the other type. It's not >> the first case of pinctrl properties with multiple types, but we don't >> really need more. > > Still an issue here. Please sort out what functionality QCom wants here. > > dtschema (main br) will now throw a warning on it. I think we can go with your patch, after double checking my previous concerns are not relevant here - driver reads it as bool just like other bool properties. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 18/04/2023 17:06, Rob Herring wrote: > The "qcom,paired" schema is all wrong. First, it's a list rather than an > object(dictionary). Second, it is missing a required type. The meta-schema > normally catches this, but schemas under "$defs" was not getting checked. > A fix for that is pending. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- Linus, Could you take it for current fixes? The code was wrong and dtschema is warning now about this. Fixes: f9a06b810951 ("dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,pmic-mpp: Convert qcom pmic mpp bindings to YAML") Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:50 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 18/04/2023 17:06, Rob Herring wrote: > > The "qcom,paired" schema is all wrong. First, it's a list rather than an > > object(dictionary). Second, it is missing a required type. The meta-schema > > normally catches this, but schemas under "$defs" was not getting checked. > > A fix for that is pending. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > --- > > Linus, > Could you take it for current fixes? The code was wrong and dtschema is > warning now about this. I have other things ready for 6.4, so I'll add this one. Thanks, Rob > > Fixes: f9a06b810951 ("dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,pmic-mpp: Convert qcom > pmic mpp bindings to YAML") > > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:46 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:50 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On 18/04/2023 17:06, Rob Herring wrote: > > > The "qcom,paired" schema is all wrong. First, it's a list rather than an > > > object(dictionary). Second, it is missing a required type. The meta-schema > > > normally catches this, but schemas under "$defs" was not getting checked. > > > A fix for that is pending. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > > --- > > > > Linus, > > Could you take it for current fixes? The code was wrong and dtschema is > > warning now about this. > > I have other things ready for 6.4, so I'll add this one. Thanks for picking this one Rob! Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Yours, Linus Walleij
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml index 9412b9362328..4c3e9ff82105 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml @@ -144,8 +144,9 @@ $defs: enum: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] qcom,paired: - - description: - Indicates that the pin should be operating in paired mode. + type: boolean + description: + Indicates that the pin should be operating in paired mode. required: - pins
The "qcom,paired" schema is all wrong. First, it's a list rather than an object(dictionary). Second, it is missing a required type. The meta-schema normally catches this, but schemas under "$defs" was not getting checked. A fix for that is pending. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-mpp.yaml | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)