Message ID | 20230305121817.2234734-1-jeremy@azazel.net |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Support for shifted port-ranges in NAT | expand |
Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net> wrote: > Jeremy Sowden (13): > netfilter: nft_nat: correct length for loading protocol registers > netfilter: nft_masq: correct length for loading protocol registers > netfilter: nft_redir: correct value of inet type `.maxattrs` > netfilter: nft_redir: correct length for loading protocol registers I think the fixess above should be routed through the 'nf' tree, I don't see why we need to hold them in -next trees for another 3 months.
On 2023-03-07, at 13:46:38 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > Jeremy Sowden wrote: > > Jeremy Sowden (13): > > netfilter: nft_nat: correct length for loading protocol registers > > netfilter: nft_masq: correct length for loading protocol registers > > netfilter: nft_redir: correct value of inet type `.maxattrs` > > netfilter: nft_redir: correct length for loading protocol > > registers > > I think the fixess above should be routed through the 'nf' tree, I > don't see why we need to hold them in -next trees for another 3 > months. When I send v2, I'll separate these out. J.