Message ID | 20220820204130.1380270-1-mail@conchuod.ie |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | dt-bindings: gpio: mpfs-gpio: allow parsing of hog child nodes. | expand |
On 20/08/2022 23:41, Conor Dooley wrote: > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > The SD card and eMMC on PolarFire SoC based dev boards are sometimes > statically muxed using a GPIO. To facilitate this, enable gpio-hog > child node properties. > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > --- > .../bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml > index 110651eafa70..6704a7a52cd0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml > @@ -44,6 +44,24 @@ properties: > > gpio-controller: true > > +patternProperties: > + "^.+-hog(?:-[0-9]+)?$": What is this pattern about: "(?:" ? > + type: object > + > + properties: > + gpio-hog: true > + gpios: true > + input: true > + output-high: true > + output-low: true > + line-name: true > + > + required: > + - gpio-hog > + - gpios > + > + additionalProperties: false Put it after type:object. Easier to read/find. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 25/08/2022 13:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On 20/08/2022 23:41, Conor Dooley wrote: >> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >> >> The SD card and eMMC on PolarFire SoC based dev boards are sometimes >> statically muxed using a GPIO. To facilitate this, enable gpio-hog >> child node properties. >> >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >> --- >> .../bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >> index 110651eafa70..6704a7a52cd0 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >> @@ -44,6 +44,24 @@ properties: >> >> gpio-controller: true >> >> +patternProperties: >> + "^.+-hog(?:-[0-9]+)?$": > > What is this pattern about: "(?:" ? Me being a pedant I suppose. "()" is a capture while "(?:)" is a match. However, it does seem like json-schema suggests using "()": https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/regular_expressions.html I don't mind & neither does the schema checker. > >> + type: object >> + >> + properties: >> + gpio-hog: true >> + gpios: true >> + input: true >> + output-high: true >> + output-low: true >> + line-name: true >> + >> + required: >> + - gpio-hog >> + - gpios >> + >> + additionalProperties: false > > Put it after type:object. Easier to read/find. Sure. Thanks, Conor.
On 25/08/2022 15:30, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote: > On 25/08/2022 13:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe >> >> On 20/08/2022 23:41, Conor Dooley wrote: >>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>> >>> The SD card and eMMC on PolarFire SoC based dev boards are sometimes >>> statically muxed using a GPIO. To facilitate this, enable gpio-hog >>> child node properties. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >>> index 110651eafa70..6704a7a52cd0 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >>> @@ -44,6 +44,24 @@ properties: >>> >>> gpio-controller: true >>> >>> +patternProperties: >>> + "^.+-hog(?:-[0-9]+)?$": >> >> What is this pattern about: "(?:" ? > > Me being a pedant I suppose. "()" is a capture while "(?:)" is a match. > However, it does seem like json-schema suggests using "()": > https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/regular_expressions.html > > I don't mind & neither does the schema checker. Use what existing sources are doing, so "^.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?$" Best regards, Krzysztof
On 25/08/2022 13:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On 25/08/2022 15:30, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote: >> On 25/08/2022 13:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe >>> >>> On 20/08/2022 23:41, Conor Dooley wrote: >>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>>> >>>> The SD card and eMMC on PolarFire SoC based dev boards are sometimes >>>> statically muxed using a GPIO. To facilitate this, enable gpio-hog >>>> child node properties. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>>> --- >>>> .../bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >>>> index 110651eafa70..6704a7a52cd0 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >>>> @@ -44,6 +44,24 @@ properties: >>>> >>>> gpio-controller: true >>>> >>>> +patternProperties: >>>> + "^.+-hog(?:-[0-9]+)?$": >>> >>> What is this pattern about: "(?:" ? >> >> Me being a pedant I suppose. "()" is a capture while "(?:)" is a match. >> However, it does seem like json-schema suggests using "()": >> https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/regular_expressions.html >> >> I don't mind & neither does the schema checker. > > Use what existing sources are doing, so "^.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?$" Willdo :)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml index 110651eafa70..6704a7a52cd0 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml @@ -44,6 +44,24 @@ properties: gpio-controller: true +patternProperties: + "^.+-hog(?:-[0-9]+)?$": + type: object + + properties: + gpio-hog: true + gpios: true + input: true + output-high: true + output-low: true + line-name: true + + required: + - gpio-hog + - gpios + + additionalProperties: false + required: - compatible - reg