Message ID | 20220806212331.40086-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v1,1/4] pwm: sysfs: Switch to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() and pm_sleep_ptr() | expand |
Hello Andy, On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 12:23:31AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Code is smaller and looks nicer if we combine polarity strings into an array. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 32 ++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c > index 767c4b19afb1..1bbc5286b7c6 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c > @@ -151,27 +151,23 @@ static ssize_t enable_store(struct device *child, > return ret ? : size; > } > > +static const char * const polarity_strings[] = { I like having function and variable prefixes, so I'd prefer this to be called pwm_polarity_strings[]. (Side note: The device show and store callbacks obviously don't have a prefix either because DEVICE_ATTR_RW et al force the functions to be called "${name}_show" and "${name}_store". I considered already a few times to introduce something like #define __ATTR_NS_RW_MODE(_name, _ns,_mode) { \ .attr = { .name = __stringify(_name), \ .mode = VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(_mode) }, \ .show = _ns ## _ ## _name ## _show, \ .store = _ns ## _ ## _name ## _store, \ } #define DEVICE_ATTR_NS_RW(_name, _ns) \ struct device_attribute _ns ## _dev_attr_ ## _name = __ATTR_NS_RW_MODE(_name, _ns, 0600) To allow the functions to have a name space. Never came around to do that though.) > + [PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL] = "normal", > + [PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED] = "inversed", I slightly prefer to not align the = in such definitions. Using a single plain space before = is already used in the definiton of pwm_class in the same file. Otherwise the patch looks fine. Best regards Uwe
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c index 767c4b19afb1..1bbc5286b7c6 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c @@ -151,27 +151,23 @@ static ssize_t enable_store(struct device *child, return ret ? : size; } +static const char * const polarity_strings[] = { + [PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL] = "normal", + [PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED] = "inversed", +}; + static ssize_t polarity_show(struct device *child, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { const struct pwm_device *pwm = child_to_pwm_device(child); - const char *polarity = "unknown"; struct pwm_state state; pwm_get_state(pwm, &state); + if (state.polarity < 0 || state.polarity >= ARRAY_SIZE(polarity_strings)) + return sysfs_emit(buf, "unknown\n"); - switch (state.polarity) { - case PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL: - polarity = "normal"; - break; - - case PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED: - polarity = "inversed"; - break; - } - - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", polarity); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", polarity_strings[state.polarity]); } static ssize_t polarity_store(struct device *child, @@ -180,20 +176,16 @@ static ssize_t polarity_store(struct device *child, { struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child); struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm; - enum pwm_polarity polarity; struct pwm_state state; int ret; - if (sysfs_streq(buf, "normal")) - polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL; - else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "inversed")) - polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED; - else - return -EINVAL; + ret = sysfs_match_string(polarity_strings, buf); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; mutex_lock(&export->lock); pwm_get_state(pwm, &state); - state.polarity = polarity; + state.polarity = ret; ret = pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state); mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
Code is smaller and looks nicer if we combine polarity strings into an array. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 32 ++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)