| Message ID | 20220410193544.1745684-1-aford173@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [V4,1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: imx-esdhc: Update compatible fallbacks | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| robh/checkpatch | success | |
| robh/patch-applied | success | |
| robh/dtbs-check | warning | build log |
| robh/dt-meta-schema | success |
On 10/04/2022 21:35, Adam Ford wrote: > The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller > as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d. > > Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support > HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d. After discussion with NXP, > it turns out that the imx8qm should fall back to the imx8qxp, because > those have some additional flags not present in the imx8mm. > > Mark the current state of the fallbacks as deprecated, and add the > proper fallbacks so in the future, the deprecated combination can be > removed and prevent any future devices from using the wrong fallback. > > Suggested-by: haibo.chen@nxp.com > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
On 10/04/2022 21:35, Adam Ford wrote: > The SDHC controller in the imx8mn has the same controller > as the imx8mm which supports HS400-ES. Change the compatible > fallback to imx8mm to enable it, but keep the imx7d-usdhc > to prevent breaking backwards compatibility. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
On 10/04/2022 21:35, Adam Ford wrote: > The SDHC controller in the imx8mp has the same controller > as the imx8mm which supports HS400-ES. Change the compatible > fallback to imx8mm to enable it, but keep the imx7d-usdhc > to prevent breaking backwards compatibility. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 1:42 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 10/04/2022 21:35, Adam Ford wrote: > > The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller > > as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d. > > > > Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support > > HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d. After discussion with NXP, > > it turns out that the imx8qm should fall back to the imx8qxp, because > > those have some additional flags not present in the imx8mm. > > > > Mark the current state of the fallbacks as deprecated, and add the > > proper fallbacks so in the future, the deprecated combination can be > > removed and prevent any future devices from using the wrong fallback. > > > > Suggested-by: haibo.chen@nxp.com > > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > Thanks for the help and guidance. I always seem to struggle with the YAML syntax. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 at 21:35, Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> wrote: > > The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller > as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d. > > Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support > HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d. After discussion with NXP, > it turns out that the imx8qm should fall back to the imx8qxp, because > those have some additional flags not present in the imx8mm. > > Mark the current state of the fallbacks as deprecated, and add the > proper fallbacks so in the future, the deprecated combination can be > removed and prevent any future devices from using the wrong fallback. > > Suggested-by: haibo.chen@nxp.com > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> Applied for next, thanks! Kind regards Uffe > --- > V4: Mark deprecated items with "deprecated: true" instead of a comment > V3: Add support for the interim fallback on imx8mn and imx8mp where > they both fallback to imx8mm, but keep the imx7d to prevent any > breakage. > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml > index 7dbbcae9485c..58447095f000 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml > @@ -34,22 +34,46 @@ properties: > - fsl,imx6ull-usdhc > - fsl,imx7d-usdhc > - fsl,imx7ulp-usdhc > + - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc > - fsl,imxrt1050-usdhc > - nxp,s32g2-usdhc > + - items: > + - enum: > + - fsl,imx8mq-usdhc > + - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc > + - items: > + - enum: > + - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc > + - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc > + - fsl,imx93-usdhc > + - fsl,imx8ulp-usdhc > + - const: fsl,imx8mm-usdhc > + - items: > + - enum: > + - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc > + - const: fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc > - items: > - enum: > - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc > - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc > - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc > - - fsl,imx8mq-usdhc > - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc > - fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc > - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc > + deprecated: true > - items: > - enum: > - - fsl,imx93-usdhc > - - fsl,imx8ulp-usdhc > + - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc > + - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc > - const: fsl,imx8mm-usdhc > + - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc > + deprecated: true > + - items: > + - enum: > + - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc > + - const: fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc > + - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc > + deprecated: true > > reg: > maxItems: 1 > -- > 2.34.1 >
On 10.04.22 21:35, Adam Ford wrote: > The SDHC controller in the imx8mp has the same controller > as the imx8mm which supports HS400-ES. Change the compatible > fallback to imx8mm to enable it, but keep the imx7d-usdhc > to prevent breaking backwards compatibility. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> Thanks, Ahmad > --- > V4: No Change > V3: No change > V2: Keep fallback to fsl,imx7d-usdhc to prevent breakage > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi > index 794d75173cf5..8578ff1062e6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp.dtsi > @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ i2c6: i2c@30ae0000 { > }; > > usdhc1: mmc@30b40000 { > - compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc"; > + compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-usdhc", "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc"; > reg = <0x30b40000 0x10000>; > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 22 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_DUMMY>, > @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ usdhc1: mmc@30b40000 { > }; > > usdhc2: mmc@30b50000 { > - compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc"; > + compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-usdhc", "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc"; > reg = <0x30b50000 0x10000>; > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_DUMMY>, > @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ usdhc2: mmc@30b50000 { > }; > > usdhc3: mmc@30b60000 { > - compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc"; > + compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-usdhc", "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc"; > reg = <0x30b60000 0x10000>; > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_DUMMY>,
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 02:35:42PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote: > The SDHC controller in the imx8mn has the same controller > as the imx8mm which supports HS400-ES. Change the compatible > fallback to imx8mm to enable it, but keep the imx7d-usdhc > to prevent breaking backwards compatibility. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> Applied #2 and #3, thanks!
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml index 7dbbcae9485c..58447095f000 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml @@ -34,22 +34,46 @@ properties: - fsl,imx6ull-usdhc - fsl,imx7d-usdhc - fsl,imx7ulp-usdhc + - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc - fsl,imxrt1050-usdhc - nxp,s32g2-usdhc + - items: + - enum: + - fsl,imx8mq-usdhc + - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc + - items: + - enum: + - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc + - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc + - fsl,imx93-usdhc + - fsl,imx8ulp-usdhc + - const: fsl,imx8mm-usdhc + - items: + - enum: + - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc + - const: fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc - items: - enum: - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc - - fsl,imx8mq-usdhc - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc - fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc + deprecated: true - items: - enum: - - fsl,imx93-usdhc - - fsl,imx8ulp-usdhc + - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc + - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc - const: fsl,imx8mm-usdhc + - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc + deprecated: true + - items: + - enum: + - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc + - const: fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc + - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc + deprecated: true reg: maxItems: 1
The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d. Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d. After discussion with NXP, it turns out that the imx8qm should fall back to the imx8qxp, because those have some additional flags not present in the imx8mm. Mark the current state of the fallbacks as deprecated, and add the proper fallbacks so in the future, the deprecated combination can be removed and prevent any future devices from using the wrong fallback. Suggested-by: haibo.chen@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> --- V4: Mark deprecated items with "deprecated: true" instead of a comment V3: Add support for the interim fallback on imx8mn and imx8mp where they both fallback to imx8mm, but keep the imx7d to prevent any breakage.