Message ID | 20211202144235.1276352-14-clg@kaod.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | ppc/pnv: Add support for user created PHB3/PHB4 devices | expand |
On 12/2/21 11:42, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > This change will help us providing support for user created PHB4 > devices. > > Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> > --- Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> > hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > hw/ppc/pnv.c | 31 +------------------------------ > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c > index dfed2af0f7df..9b081d543057 100644 > --- a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c > +++ b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c > @@ -556,6 +556,10 @@ static void pnv_pec_stk_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > { > PnvPhb4PecStack *stack = PNV_PHB4_PEC_STACK(dev); > PnvPhb4PecState *pec = stack->pec; > + PnvPhb4PecClass *pecc = PNV_PHB4_PEC_GET_CLASS(pec); > + PnvChip *chip = pec->chip; > + uint32_t pec_nest_base; > + uint32_t pec_pci_base; > char name[64]; > > assert(pec); > @@ -579,10 +583,34 @@ static void pnv_pec_stk_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > pnv_xscom_region_init(&stack->phb_regs_mr, OBJECT(&stack->phb), > &pnv_phb4_xscom_ops, &stack->phb, name, 0x40); > > - /* > - * Let the machine/chip realize the PHB object to customize more > - * easily some fields > - */ > + { > + Object *obj = OBJECT(&stack->phb); > + > + object_property_set_int(obj, "chip-id", pec->chip_id, &error_fatal); > + object_property_set_int(obj, "version", pecc->version, &error_fatal); > + object_property_set_int(obj, "device-id", pecc->device_id, > + &error_fatal); > + object_property_set_link(obj, "stack", OBJECT(stack), > + &error_abort); > + if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), errp)) { > + return; > + } > + } > + > + pec_nest_base = pecc->xscom_nest_base(pec); > + pec_pci_base = pecc->xscom_pci_base(pec); > + > + /* Populate the XSCOM address space. */ > + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > + pec_nest_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), > + &stack->nest_regs_mr); > + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > + pec_pci_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), > + &stack->pci_regs_mr); > + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > + pec_pci_base + PNV9_XSCOM_PEC_PCI_STK0 + > + 0x40 * stack->stack_no, > + &stack->phb_regs_mr); > } > > static Property pnv_pec_stk_properties[] = { > diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c > index 3a550eed0f36..7e13b15241fd 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c > @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_quad_realize(Pnv9Chip *chip9, Error **errp) > static void pnv_chip_power9_phb_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp) > { > Pnv9Chip *chip9 = PNV9_CHIP(chip); > - int i, j; > + int i; > > for (i = 0; i < chip->num_pecs; i++) { > PnvPhb4PecState *pec = &chip9->pecs[i]; > @@ -1392,35 +1392,6 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_phb_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp) > > pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, pec_nest_base, &pec->nest_regs_mr); > pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, pec_pci_base, &pec->pci_regs_mr); > - > - for (j = 0; j < pec->num_stacks; j++) { > - PnvPhb4PecStack *stack = &pec->stacks[j]; > - Object *obj = OBJECT(&stack->phb); > - > - object_property_set_int(obj, "chip-id", chip->chip_id, > - &error_fatal); > - object_property_set_int(obj, "version", pecc->version, > - &error_fatal); > - object_property_set_int(obj, "device-id", pecc->device_id, > - &error_fatal); > - object_property_set_link(obj, "stack", OBJECT(stack), > - &error_abort); > - if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), errp)) { > - return; > - } > - > - /* Populate the XSCOM address space. */ > - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > - pec_nest_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), > - &stack->nest_regs_mr); > - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > - pec_pci_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), > - &stack->pci_regs_mr); > - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > - pec_pci_base + PNV9_XSCOM_PEC_PCI_STK0 + > - 0x40 * stack->stack_no, > - &stack->phb_regs_mr); > - } > } > } > >
On 02/12/2021 15:42, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > This change will help us providing support for user created PHB4 > devices. > > Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> > --- > hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > hw/ppc/pnv.c | 31 +------------------------------ > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c > index dfed2af0f7df..9b081d543057 100644 > --- a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c > +++ b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c > @@ -556,6 +556,10 @@ static void pnv_pec_stk_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > { > PnvPhb4PecStack *stack = PNV_PHB4_PEC_STACK(dev); > PnvPhb4PecState *pec = stack->pec; > + PnvPhb4PecClass *pecc = PNV_PHB4_PEC_GET_CLASS(pec); > + PnvChip *chip = pec->chip; > + uint32_t pec_nest_base; > + uint32_t pec_pci_base; > char name[64]; > > assert(pec); > @@ -579,10 +583,34 @@ static void pnv_pec_stk_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > pnv_xscom_region_init(&stack->phb_regs_mr, OBJECT(&stack->phb), > &pnv_phb4_xscom_ops, &stack->phb, name, 0x40); > > - /* > - * Let the machine/chip realize the PHB object to customize more > - * easily some fields > - */ > + { > + Object *obj = OBJECT(&stack->phb); > + > + object_property_set_int(obj, "chip-id", pec->chip_id, &error_fatal); > + object_property_set_int(obj, "version", pecc->version, &error_fatal); > + object_property_set_int(obj, "device-id", pecc->device_id, > + &error_fatal); > + object_property_set_link(obj, "stack", OBJECT(stack), > + &error_abort); > + if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), errp)) { > + return; > + } > + } Do we really need the extra sub-scope here? It looks off. > + > + pec_nest_base = pecc->xscom_nest_base(pec); > + pec_pci_base = pecc->xscom_pci_base(pec); > + > + /* Populate the XSCOM address space. */ > + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > + pec_nest_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), > + &stack->nest_regs_mr); > + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > + pec_pci_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), > + &stack->pci_regs_mr); > + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > + pec_pci_base + PNV9_XSCOM_PEC_PCI_STK0 + > + 0x40 * stack->stack_no, > + &stack->phb_regs_mr); > } > > static Property pnv_pec_stk_properties[] = { > diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c > index 3a550eed0f36..7e13b15241fd 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c > @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_quad_realize(Pnv9Chip *chip9, Error **errp) > static void pnv_chip_power9_phb_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp) > { With that change, we should really rename pnv_chip_power9_phb_realize() to pnv_chip_power9_pec_realize(). Fred > Pnv9Chip *chip9 = PNV9_CHIP(chip); > - int i, j; > + int i; > > for (i = 0; i < chip->num_pecs; i++) { > PnvPhb4PecState *pec = &chip9->pecs[i]; > @@ -1392,35 +1392,6 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_phb_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp) > > pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, pec_nest_base, &pec->nest_regs_mr); > pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, pec_pci_base, &pec->pci_regs_mr); > - > - for (j = 0; j < pec->num_stacks; j++) { > - PnvPhb4PecStack *stack = &pec->stacks[j]; > - Object *obj = OBJECT(&stack->phb); > - > - object_property_set_int(obj, "chip-id", chip->chip_id, > - &error_fatal); > - object_property_set_int(obj, "version", pecc->version, > - &error_fatal); > - object_property_set_int(obj, "device-id", pecc->device_id, > - &error_fatal); > - object_property_set_link(obj, "stack", OBJECT(stack), > - &error_abort); > - if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), errp)) { > - return; > - } > - > - /* Populate the XSCOM address space. */ > - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > - pec_nest_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), > - &stack->nest_regs_mr); > - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > - pec_pci_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), > - &stack->pci_regs_mr); > - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, > - pec_pci_base + PNV9_XSCOM_PEC_PCI_STK0 + > - 0x40 * stack->stack_no, > - &stack->phb_regs_mr); > - } > } > } > >
On 12/7/21 11:10, Frederic Barrat wrote: > > > On 02/12/2021 15:42, Cédric Le Goater wrote: >> This change will help us providing support for user created PHB4 >> devices. >> >> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> >> --- >> hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> hw/ppc/pnv.c | 31 +------------------------------ >> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c >> index dfed2af0f7df..9b081d543057 100644 >> --- a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c >> +++ b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c >> @@ -556,6 +556,10 @@ static void pnv_pec_stk_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) >> { >> PnvPhb4PecStack *stack = PNV_PHB4_PEC_STACK(dev); >> PnvPhb4PecState *pec = stack->pec; >> + PnvPhb4PecClass *pecc = PNV_PHB4_PEC_GET_CLASS(pec); >> + PnvChip *chip = pec->chip; >> + uint32_t pec_nest_base; >> + uint32_t pec_pci_base; >> char name[64]; >> assert(pec); >> @@ -579,10 +583,34 @@ static void pnv_pec_stk_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) >> pnv_xscom_region_init(&stack->phb_regs_mr, OBJECT(&stack->phb), >> &pnv_phb4_xscom_ops, &stack->phb, name, 0x40); >> - /* >> - * Let the machine/chip realize the PHB object to customize more >> - * easily some fields >> - */ >> + { >> + Object *obj = OBJECT(&stack->phb); >> + >> + object_property_set_int(obj, "chip-id", pec->chip_id, &error_fatal); >> + object_property_set_int(obj, "version", pecc->version, &error_fatal); >> + object_property_set_int(obj, "device-id", pecc->device_id, >> + &error_fatal); >> + object_property_set_link(obj, "stack", OBJECT(stack), >> + &error_abort); >> + if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), errp)) { >> + return; >> + } >> + } > > > Do we really need the extra sub-scope here? It looks off. No. That's a left over from the initial patches I worked on. >> + >> + pec_nest_base = pecc->xscom_nest_base(pec); >> + pec_pci_base = pecc->xscom_pci_base(pec); >> + >> + /* Populate the XSCOM address space. */ >> + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, >> + pec_nest_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), >> + &stack->nest_regs_mr); >> + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, >> + pec_pci_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), >> + &stack->pci_regs_mr); >> + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, >> + pec_pci_base + PNV9_XSCOM_PEC_PCI_STK0 + >> + 0x40 * stack->stack_no, >> + &stack->phb_regs_mr); >> } >> static Property pnv_pec_stk_properties[] = { >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c >> index 3a550eed0f36..7e13b15241fd 100644 >> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c >> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c >> @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_quad_realize(Pnv9Chip *chip9, Error **errp) >> static void pnv_chip_power9_phb_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp) >> { > > > With that change, we should really rename pnv_chip_power9_phb_realize() to pnv_chip_power9_pec_realize(). yes. Thanks, C. > > Fred > > >> Pnv9Chip *chip9 = PNV9_CHIP(chip); >> - int i, j; >> + int i; >> for (i = 0; i < chip->num_pecs; i++) { >> PnvPhb4PecState *pec = &chip9->pecs[i]; >> @@ -1392,35 +1392,6 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_phb_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp) >> pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, pec_nest_base, &pec->nest_regs_mr); >> pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, pec_pci_base, &pec->pci_regs_mr); >> - >> - for (j = 0; j < pec->num_stacks; j++) { >> - PnvPhb4PecStack *stack = &pec->stacks[j]; >> - Object *obj = OBJECT(&stack->phb); >> - >> - object_property_set_int(obj, "chip-id", chip->chip_id, >> - &error_fatal); >> - object_property_set_int(obj, "version", pecc->version, >> - &error_fatal); >> - object_property_set_int(obj, "device-id", pecc->device_id, >> - &error_fatal); >> - object_property_set_link(obj, "stack", OBJECT(stack), >> - &error_abort); >> - if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), errp)) { >> - return; >> - } >> - >> - /* Populate the XSCOM address space. */ >> - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, >> - pec_nest_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), >> - &stack->nest_regs_mr); >> - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, >> - pec_pci_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), >> - &stack->pci_regs_mr); >> - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, >> - pec_pci_base + PNV9_XSCOM_PEC_PCI_STK0 + >> - 0x40 * stack->stack_no, >> - &stack->phb_regs_mr); >> - } >> } >> } >>
diff --git a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c index dfed2af0f7df..9b081d543057 100644 --- a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c +++ b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c @@ -556,6 +556,10 @@ static void pnv_pec_stk_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) { PnvPhb4PecStack *stack = PNV_PHB4_PEC_STACK(dev); PnvPhb4PecState *pec = stack->pec; + PnvPhb4PecClass *pecc = PNV_PHB4_PEC_GET_CLASS(pec); + PnvChip *chip = pec->chip; + uint32_t pec_nest_base; + uint32_t pec_pci_base; char name[64]; assert(pec); @@ -579,10 +583,34 @@ static void pnv_pec_stk_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) pnv_xscom_region_init(&stack->phb_regs_mr, OBJECT(&stack->phb), &pnv_phb4_xscom_ops, &stack->phb, name, 0x40); - /* - * Let the machine/chip realize the PHB object to customize more - * easily some fields - */ + { + Object *obj = OBJECT(&stack->phb); + + object_property_set_int(obj, "chip-id", pec->chip_id, &error_fatal); + object_property_set_int(obj, "version", pecc->version, &error_fatal); + object_property_set_int(obj, "device-id", pecc->device_id, + &error_fatal); + object_property_set_link(obj, "stack", OBJECT(stack), + &error_abort); + if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), errp)) { + return; + } + } + + pec_nest_base = pecc->xscom_nest_base(pec); + pec_pci_base = pecc->xscom_pci_base(pec); + + /* Populate the XSCOM address space. */ + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, + pec_nest_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), + &stack->nest_regs_mr); + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, + pec_pci_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), + &stack->pci_regs_mr); + pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, + pec_pci_base + PNV9_XSCOM_PEC_PCI_STK0 + + 0x40 * stack->stack_no, + &stack->phb_regs_mr); } static Property pnv_pec_stk_properties[] = { diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c index 3a550eed0f36..7e13b15241fd 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_quad_realize(Pnv9Chip *chip9, Error **errp) static void pnv_chip_power9_phb_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp) { Pnv9Chip *chip9 = PNV9_CHIP(chip); - int i, j; + int i; for (i = 0; i < chip->num_pecs; i++) { PnvPhb4PecState *pec = &chip9->pecs[i]; @@ -1392,35 +1392,6 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_phb_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp) pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, pec_nest_base, &pec->nest_regs_mr); pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, pec_pci_base, &pec->pci_regs_mr); - - for (j = 0; j < pec->num_stacks; j++) { - PnvPhb4PecStack *stack = &pec->stacks[j]; - Object *obj = OBJECT(&stack->phb); - - object_property_set_int(obj, "chip-id", chip->chip_id, - &error_fatal); - object_property_set_int(obj, "version", pecc->version, - &error_fatal); - object_property_set_int(obj, "device-id", pecc->device_id, - &error_fatal); - object_property_set_link(obj, "stack", OBJECT(stack), - &error_abort); - if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), errp)) { - return; - } - - /* Populate the XSCOM address space. */ - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, - pec_nest_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), - &stack->nest_regs_mr); - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, - pec_pci_base + 0x40 * (stack->stack_no + 1), - &stack->pci_regs_mr); - pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, - pec_pci_base + PNV9_XSCOM_PEC_PCI_STK0 + - 0x40 * stack->stack_no, - &stack->phb_regs_mr); - } } }
This change will help us providing support for user created PHB4 devices. Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> --- hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- hw/ppc/pnv.c | 31 +------------------------------ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)