mbox series

[v2,0/4] dt-bindings: soc: smem: Make indirection optional

Message ID 20210930182111.57353-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Headers show
Series dt-bindings: soc: smem: Make indirection optional | expand

Message

Bjorn Andersson Sept. 30, 2021, 6:21 p.m. UTC 
In the modern Qualcomm platform there's no reason for having smem as a
separate node, so let's change this.

Bjorn Andersson (4):
  dt-bindings: sram: Document qcom,rpm-msg-ram
  dt-bindings: soc: smem: Make indirection optional
  soc: qcom: smem: Support reserved-memory description
  arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Drop standalone smem node

 .../bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smem.yaml          | 34 +++++++++--
 .../devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml        |  5 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi          | 10 +---
 drivers/of/platform.c                         |  1 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c                       | 57 +++++++++++++------
 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

Comments

Vladimir Zapolskiy Oct. 1, 2021, 7:11 a.m. UTC | #1 
Hi Bjorn,

On 9/30/21 9:21 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> In the modern Qualcomm platform there's no reason for having smem as a
> separate node, so let's change this.
> 
> Bjorn Andersson (4):
>    dt-bindings: sram: Document qcom,rpm-msg-ram
>    dt-bindings: soc: smem: Make indirection optional
>    soc: qcom: smem: Support reserved-memory description
>    arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Drop standalone smem node
> 
>   .../bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smem.yaml          | 34 +++++++++--
>   .../devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml        |  5 +-
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi          | 10 +---
>   drivers/of/platform.c                         |  1 +
>   drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c                       | 57 +++++++++++++------
>   5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 

the patch series looks good.

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Bjorn Andersson Oct. 17, 2021, 3:31 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:21:07 -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> In the modern Qualcomm platform there's no reason for having smem as a
> separate node, so let's change this.
> 
> Bjorn Andersson (4):
>   dt-bindings: sram: Document qcom,rpm-msg-ram
>   dt-bindings: soc: smem: Make indirection optional
>   soc: qcom: smem: Support reserved-memory description
>   arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Drop standalone smem node
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Drop standalone smem node
      commit: 622adb84b3e7c48a888c3df26fbf28679ded660b

Best regards,
Bjorn Andersson Oct. 17, 2021, 3:31 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:21:11 -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Now that the SMEM binding and driver allows the SMEM node to be
> described in the reserved-memory region directly, move the compatible
> and hwlock properties to the reserved-memory node and drop the
> standadlone node.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Drop standalone smem node
      commit: 622adb84b3e7c48a888c3df26fbf28679ded660b

Best regards,