Message ID | a9f730cf-e31e-902b-7b39-0ff2e99636e0@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | PCI/VPD: Convert more users to the new VPD API functions | expand |
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 03:54:23PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > Use pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword() to search for keywords in VPD to > simplify the code. > > str_id_reg and str_id_cap hold the same string and are used in the same > comparison. This doesn't make sense, use one string str_id instead. str_id_reg is printed with "%04x" (lower-case hex letters) and str_id_cap with "%04X" (upper-case hex letters), so the previous code would match either 0xabcd or 0xABCD. After this patch, we'd match only the latter. PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL is 0x1028, so it shouldn't make any difference, which makes me wonder why somebody bothered with both. But it does seem like a potential landmine to change the case sensitivity. Maybe strncasecmp() instead? > Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> > --- > .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 57 +++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c > index 0466adf8d..2c7bfc416 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c > @@ -12189,11 +12189,10 @@ static int bnx2x_get_hwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) > > static void bnx2x_read_fwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) > { > - int i, block_end, rodi; > - char str_id_reg[VENDOR_ID_LEN+1]; > - char str_id_cap[VENDOR_ID_LEN+1]; > - unsigned int vpd_len; > - u8 *vpd_data, len; > + char str_id[VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1]; > + unsigned int vpd_len, kw_len; > + u8 *vpd_data; > + int rodi; > > memset(bp->fw_ver, 0, sizeof(bp->fw_ver)); > > @@ -12201,46 +12200,20 @@ static void bnx2x_read_fwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) > if (IS_ERR(vpd_data)) > return; > > - /* VPD RO tag should be first tag after identifier string, hence > - * we should be able to find it in first BNX2X_VPD_LEN chars > - */ > - i = pci_vpd_find_tag(vpd_data, vpd_len, PCI_VPD_LRDT_RO_DATA); > - if (i < 0) > - goto out_not_found; > - > - block_end = i + PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE + > - pci_vpd_lrdt_size(&vpd_data[i]); > - i += PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE; > - > - rodi = pci_vpd_find_info_keyword(vpd_data, i, block_end, > - PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_MFR_ID); > - if (rodi < 0) > - goto out_not_found; > - > - len = pci_vpd_info_field_size(&vpd_data[rodi]); > - > - if (len != VENDOR_ID_LEN) > + rodi = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd_data, vpd_len, > + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_MFR_ID, &kw_len); > + if (rodi < 0 || kw_len != VENDOR_ID_LEN) > goto out_not_found; > > - rodi += PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE; > - > /* vendor specific info */ > - snprintf(str_id_reg, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04x", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); > - snprintf(str_id_cap, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04X", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); > - if (!strncmp(str_id_reg, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN) || > - !strncmp(str_id_cap, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN)) { > - > - rodi = pci_vpd_find_info_keyword(vpd_data, i, block_end, > - PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_VENDOR0); > - if (rodi >= 0) { > - len = pci_vpd_info_field_size(&vpd_data[rodi]); > - > - rodi += PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE; > - > - if (len < 32 && (len + rodi) <= vpd_len) { > - memcpy(bp->fw_ver, &vpd_data[rodi], len); > - bp->fw_ver[len] = ' '; > - } > + snprintf(str_id, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04X", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); > + if (!strncmp(str_id, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN)) { > + rodi = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd_data, vpd_len, > + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_VENDOR0, > + &kw_len); > + if (rodi >= 0 && kw_len < sizeof(bp->fw_ver)) { > + memcpy(bp->fw_ver, &vpd_data[rodi], kw_len); > + bp->fw_ver[kw_len] = ' '; > } > } > out_not_found: > -- > 2.33.0 > >
On 24.08.2021 19:02, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 03:54:23PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> Use pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword() to search for keywords in VPD to >> simplify the code. >> >> str_id_reg and str_id_cap hold the same string and are used in the same >> comparison. This doesn't make sense, use one string str_id instead. > > str_id_reg is printed with "%04x" (lower-case hex letters) and > str_id_cap with "%04X" (upper-case hex letters), so the previous code > would match either 0xabcd or 0xABCD. After this patch, we'd match > only the latter. > Right, I missed this difference. strncasecmp() would be an easy solution. Alternatively we could avoid this stringification and string comparison by using kstrtouint_from_user(): kstrtouint_from_user(&vpd_data[rodi], kw_len, 16, &val) if (val == PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL) But if there's no strong preference then I'd say we go the easy way. Would you like me to re-send or are you going to adjust the patch? > PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL is 0x1028, so it shouldn't make any difference, > which makes me wonder why somebody bothered with both. > > But it does seem like a potential landmine to change the case > sensitivity. Maybe strncasecmp() instead? > >> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> >> --- >> .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 57 +++++-------------- >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c >> index 0466adf8d..2c7bfc416 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c >> @@ -12189,11 +12189,10 @@ static int bnx2x_get_hwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) >> >> static void bnx2x_read_fwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) >> { >> - int i, block_end, rodi; >> - char str_id_reg[VENDOR_ID_LEN+1]; >> - char str_id_cap[VENDOR_ID_LEN+1]; >> - unsigned int vpd_len; >> - u8 *vpd_data, len; >> + char str_id[VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1]; >> + unsigned int vpd_len, kw_len; >> + u8 *vpd_data; >> + int rodi; >> >> memset(bp->fw_ver, 0, sizeof(bp->fw_ver)); >> >> @@ -12201,46 +12200,20 @@ static void bnx2x_read_fwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) >> if (IS_ERR(vpd_data)) >> return; >> >> - /* VPD RO tag should be first tag after identifier string, hence >> - * we should be able to find it in first BNX2X_VPD_LEN chars >> - */ >> - i = pci_vpd_find_tag(vpd_data, vpd_len, PCI_VPD_LRDT_RO_DATA); >> - if (i < 0) >> - goto out_not_found; >> - >> - block_end = i + PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE + >> - pci_vpd_lrdt_size(&vpd_data[i]); >> - i += PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE; >> - >> - rodi = pci_vpd_find_info_keyword(vpd_data, i, block_end, >> - PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_MFR_ID); >> - if (rodi < 0) >> - goto out_not_found; >> - >> - len = pci_vpd_info_field_size(&vpd_data[rodi]); >> - >> - if (len != VENDOR_ID_LEN) >> + rodi = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd_data, vpd_len, >> + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_MFR_ID, &kw_len); >> + if (rodi < 0 || kw_len != VENDOR_ID_LEN) >> goto out_not_found; >> >> - rodi += PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE; >> - >> /* vendor specific info */ >> - snprintf(str_id_reg, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04x", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); >> - snprintf(str_id_cap, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04X", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); >> - if (!strncmp(str_id_reg, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN) || >> - !strncmp(str_id_cap, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN)) { >> - >> - rodi = pci_vpd_find_info_keyword(vpd_data, i, block_end, >> - PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_VENDOR0); >> - if (rodi >= 0) { >> - len = pci_vpd_info_field_size(&vpd_data[rodi]); >> - >> - rodi += PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE; >> - >> - if (len < 32 && (len + rodi) <= vpd_len) { >> - memcpy(bp->fw_ver, &vpd_data[rodi], len); >> - bp->fw_ver[len] = ' '; >> - } >> + snprintf(str_id, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04X", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); >> + if (!strncmp(str_id, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN)) { >> + rodi = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd_data, vpd_len, >> + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_VENDOR0, >> + &kw_len); >> + if (rodi >= 0 && kw_len < sizeof(bp->fw_ver)) { >> + memcpy(bp->fw_ver, &vpd_data[rodi], kw_len); >> + bp->fw_ver[kw_len] = ' '; >> } >> } >> out_not_found: >> -- >> 2.33.0 >> >>
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 08:01:34PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > On 24.08.2021 19:02, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 03:54:23PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >> Use pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword() to search for keywords in VPD to > >> simplify the code. > >> > >> str_id_reg and str_id_cap hold the same string and are used in the same > >> comparison. This doesn't make sense, use one string str_id instead. > > > > str_id_reg is printed with "%04x" (lower-case hex letters) and > > str_id_cap with "%04X" (upper-case hex letters), so the previous code > > would match either 0xabcd or 0xABCD. After this patch, we'd match > > only the latter. > > > Right, I missed this difference. strncasecmp() would be an easy solution. > Alternatively we could avoid this stringification and string comparison > by using kstrtouint_from_user(): > > kstrtouint_from_user(&vpd_data[rodi], kw_len, 16, &val) > if (val == PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL) > > But if there's no strong preference then I'd say we go the easy way. > Would you like me to re-send or are you going to adjust the patch? I adjusted it, thanks! > > PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL is 0x1028, so it shouldn't make any difference, > > which makes me wonder why somebody bothered with both. > > > > But it does seem like a potential landmine to change the case > > sensitivity. Maybe strncasecmp() instead? > > > >> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 57 +++++-------------- > >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c > >> index 0466adf8d..2c7bfc416 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c > >> @@ -12189,11 +12189,10 @@ static int bnx2x_get_hwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) > >> > >> static void bnx2x_read_fwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) > >> { > >> - int i, block_end, rodi; > >> - char str_id_reg[VENDOR_ID_LEN+1]; > >> - char str_id_cap[VENDOR_ID_LEN+1]; > >> - unsigned int vpd_len; > >> - u8 *vpd_data, len; > >> + char str_id[VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1]; > >> + unsigned int vpd_len, kw_len; > >> + u8 *vpd_data; > >> + int rodi; > >> > >> memset(bp->fw_ver, 0, sizeof(bp->fw_ver)); > >> > >> @@ -12201,46 +12200,20 @@ static void bnx2x_read_fwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) > >> if (IS_ERR(vpd_data)) > >> return; > >> > >> - /* VPD RO tag should be first tag after identifier string, hence > >> - * we should be able to find it in first BNX2X_VPD_LEN chars > >> - */ > >> - i = pci_vpd_find_tag(vpd_data, vpd_len, PCI_VPD_LRDT_RO_DATA); > >> - if (i < 0) > >> - goto out_not_found; > >> - > >> - block_end = i + PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE + > >> - pci_vpd_lrdt_size(&vpd_data[i]); > >> - i += PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE; > >> - > >> - rodi = pci_vpd_find_info_keyword(vpd_data, i, block_end, > >> - PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_MFR_ID); > >> - if (rodi < 0) > >> - goto out_not_found; > >> - > >> - len = pci_vpd_info_field_size(&vpd_data[rodi]); > >> - > >> - if (len != VENDOR_ID_LEN) > >> + rodi = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd_data, vpd_len, > >> + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_MFR_ID, &kw_len); > >> + if (rodi < 0 || kw_len != VENDOR_ID_LEN) > >> goto out_not_found; > >> > >> - rodi += PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE; > >> - > >> /* vendor specific info */ > >> - snprintf(str_id_reg, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04x", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); > >> - snprintf(str_id_cap, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04X", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); > >> - if (!strncmp(str_id_reg, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN) || > >> - !strncmp(str_id_cap, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN)) { > >> - > >> - rodi = pci_vpd_find_info_keyword(vpd_data, i, block_end, > >> - PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_VENDOR0); > >> - if (rodi >= 0) { > >> - len = pci_vpd_info_field_size(&vpd_data[rodi]); > >> - > >> - rodi += PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE; > >> - > >> - if (len < 32 && (len + rodi) <= vpd_len) { > >> - memcpy(bp->fw_ver, &vpd_data[rodi], len); > >> - bp->fw_ver[len] = ' '; > >> - } > >> + snprintf(str_id, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04X", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); > >> + if (!strncmp(str_id, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN)) { > >> + rodi = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd_data, vpd_len, > >> + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_VENDOR0, > >> + &kw_len); > >> + if (rodi >= 0 && kw_len < sizeof(bp->fw_ver)) { > >> + memcpy(bp->fw_ver, &vpd_data[rodi], kw_len); > >> + bp->fw_ver[kw_len] = ' '; > >> } > >> } > >> out_not_found: > >> -- > >> 2.33.0 > >> > >> >
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c index 0466adf8d..2c7bfc416 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c @@ -12189,11 +12189,10 @@ static int bnx2x_get_hwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) static void bnx2x_read_fwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) { - int i, block_end, rodi; - char str_id_reg[VENDOR_ID_LEN+1]; - char str_id_cap[VENDOR_ID_LEN+1]; - unsigned int vpd_len; - u8 *vpd_data, len; + char str_id[VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1]; + unsigned int vpd_len, kw_len; + u8 *vpd_data; + int rodi; memset(bp->fw_ver, 0, sizeof(bp->fw_ver)); @@ -12201,46 +12200,20 @@ static void bnx2x_read_fwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp) if (IS_ERR(vpd_data)) return; - /* VPD RO tag should be first tag after identifier string, hence - * we should be able to find it in first BNX2X_VPD_LEN chars - */ - i = pci_vpd_find_tag(vpd_data, vpd_len, PCI_VPD_LRDT_RO_DATA); - if (i < 0) - goto out_not_found; - - block_end = i + PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE + - pci_vpd_lrdt_size(&vpd_data[i]); - i += PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE; - - rodi = pci_vpd_find_info_keyword(vpd_data, i, block_end, - PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_MFR_ID); - if (rodi < 0) - goto out_not_found; - - len = pci_vpd_info_field_size(&vpd_data[rodi]); - - if (len != VENDOR_ID_LEN) + rodi = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd_data, vpd_len, + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_MFR_ID, &kw_len); + if (rodi < 0 || kw_len != VENDOR_ID_LEN) goto out_not_found; - rodi += PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE; - /* vendor specific info */ - snprintf(str_id_reg, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04x", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); - snprintf(str_id_cap, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04X", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); - if (!strncmp(str_id_reg, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN) || - !strncmp(str_id_cap, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN)) { - - rodi = pci_vpd_find_info_keyword(vpd_data, i, block_end, - PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_VENDOR0); - if (rodi >= 0) { - len = pci_vpd_info_field_size(&vpd_data[rodi]); - - rodi += PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE; - - if (len < 32 && (len + rodi) <= vpd_len) { - memcpy(bp->fw_ver, &vpd_data[rodi], len); - bp->fw_ver[len] = ' '; - } + snprintf(str_id, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04X", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL); + if (!strncmp(str_id, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN)) { + rodi = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd_data, vpd_len, + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_VENDOR0, + &kw_len); + if (rodi >= 0 && kw_len < sizeof(bp->fw_ver)) { + memcpy(bp->fw_ver, &vpd_data[rodi], kw_len); + bp->fw_ver[kw_len] = ' '; } } out_not_found:
Use pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword() to search for keywords in VPD to simplify the code. str_id_reg and str_id_cap hold the same string and are used in the same comparison. This doesn't make sense, use one string str_id instead. Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> --- .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 57 +++++-------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)