Message ID | 20200914155714.GA43910@black.fi.intel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.9-2 | expand |
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:57 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans.
Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this
so I suppose it is based on some other -rc.
I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:08 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:57 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans. > > Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this > so I suppose it is based on some other -rc. > > I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes. It will break fast forward. Is it a problem to have v5.9-rc4 there?
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:43 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:08 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:57 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans. > > > > Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this > > so I suppose it is based on some other -rc. > > > > I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes. > > It will break fast forward. Is it a problem to have v5.9-rc4 there? Not really other than it is kludgy to merge it in, but is it a problem that I just cherry-picked it and signed it off instead? Is something built on top of it since you're concerned about fast-forwarding? Yours, Linus Walleij
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:48 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:43 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:08 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:57 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans. > > > > > > Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this > > > so I suppose it is based on some other -rc. > > > > > > I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes. > > > > It will break fast forward. Is it a problem to have v5.9-rc4 there? > > Not really other than it is kludgy to merge it in, but is it a problem > that I just cherry-picked it and signed it off instead? Is something > built on top of it since you're concerned about fast-forwarding? I rethought the scenario and I guess it should be fine. Please, go ahead with cherry picking (it's only one commit anyway). Thanks!