diff mbox series

[net-next,RFC,v4,04/15] devlink: Add reload actions stats to dev get

Message ID 1600063682-17313-5-git-send-email-moshe@mellanox.com
State RFC
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show
Series Add devlink reload action and | expand

Commit Message

Moshe Shemesh Sept. 14, 2020, 6:07 a.m. UTC
Expose devlink reload actions stats to the user through devlink dev
get command.

Examples:
$ devlink dev show
pci/0000:82:00.0:
  reload_action_stats:
    driver_reinit 2
    fw_activate 1
    driver_reinit_no_reset 0
    fw_activate_no_reset 0
pci/0000:82:00.1:
  reload_action_stats:
    driver_reinit 1
    fw_activate 1
    driver_reinit_no_reset 0
    fw_activate_no_reset 0

$ devlink dev show -jp
{
    "dev": {
        "pci/0000:82:00.0": {
            "reload_action_stats": [ {
                    "driver_reinit": 2
                },{
                    "fw_activate": 1
                },{
                    "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
                },{
                    "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
                } ]
        },
        "pci/0000:82:00.1": {
            "reload_action_stats": [ {
                    "driver_reinit": 1
                },{
                    "fw_activate": 1
                },{
                    "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
                },{
                    "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
                } ]
        }
    }
}

Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@mellanox.com>
---
v3 -> v4:
- Renamed DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_CNT to
  DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_STAT
- Add stats per action per limit level
v2 -> v3:
- Add reload actions counters instead of supported reload actions
  (reload actions counters are only for supported action so no need for
   both)
v1 -> v2:
- Removed DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_DEFAULT_LEVEL
- Removed DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_LEVELS_INFO
- Have actions instead of levels
---
 include/uapi/linux/devlink.h |  3 +++
 net/core/devlink.c           | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Jiri Pirko Sept. 14, 2020, 1:45 p.m. UTC | #1
Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:51AM CEST, moshe@mellanox.com wrote:
>Expose devlink reload actions stats to the user through devlink dev
>get command.
>
>Examples:
>$ devlink dev show
>pci/0000:82:00.0:
>  reload_action_stats:
>    driver_reinit 2
>    fw_activate 1
>    driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>    fw_activate_no_reset 0
>pci/0000:82:00.1:
>  reload_action_stats:
>    driver_reinit 1
>    fw_activate 1
>    driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>    fw_activate_no_reset 0

I would rather have something like:
   stats:
     reload_action:
       driver_reinit 1
       fw_activate 1
       driver_reinit_no_reset 0
       fw_activate_no_reset 0

Then we can easily extend and add other stats in the tree.


Also, I wonder if these stats could be somehow merged with Ido's metrics
work:
https://github.com/idosch/linux/commits/submit/devlink_metric_rfc_v1

Ido, would it make sense?


>
>$ devlink dev show -jp
>{
>    "dev": {
>        "pci/0000:82:00.0": {
>            "reload_action_stats": [ {
>                    "driver_reinit": 2
>                },{
>                    "fw_activate": 1
>                },{
>                    "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>                },{
>                    "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>                } ]
>        },
>        "pci/0000:82:00.1": {
>            "reload_action_stats": [ {
>                    "driver_reinit": 1
>                },{
>                    "fw_activate": 1
>                },{
>                    "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>                },{
>                    "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>                } ]
>        }
>    }
>}
>

[..]
Ido Schimmel Sept. 15, 2020, 6:45 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:45:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:51AM CEST, moshe@mellanox.com wrote:
> >Expose devlink reload actions stats to the user through devlink dev
> >get command.
> >
> >Examples:
> >$ devlink dev show
> >pci/0000:82:00.0:
> >  reload_action_stats:
> >    driver_reinit 2
> >    fw_activate 1
> >    driver_reinit_no_reset 0
> >    fw_activate_no_reset 0
> >pci/0000:82:00.1:
> >  reload_action_stats:
> >    driver_reinit 1
> >    fw_activate 1
> >    driver_reinit_no_reset 0
> >    fw_activate_no_reset 0
> 
> I would rather have something like:
>    stats:
>      reload_action:
>        driver_reinit 1
>        fw_activate 1
>        driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>        fw_activate_no_reset 0
> 
> Then we can easily extend and add other stats in the tree.
> 
> 
> Also, I wonder if these stats could be somehow merged with Ido's metrics
> work:
> https://github.com/idosch/linux/commits/submit/devlink_metric_rfc_v1
> 
> Ido, would it make sense?

I guess. My original idea for devlink-metric was to expose
design-specific metrics to user space where the entity registering the
metrics is the device driver. In this case the entity would be devlink
itself and it would be auto-registered for each device.

> 
> 
> >
> >$ devlink dev show -jp
> >{
> >    "dev": {
> >        "pci/0000:82:00.0": {
> >            "reload_action_stats": [ {
> >                    "driver_reinit": 2
> >                },{
> >                    "fw_activate": 1
> >                },{
> >                    "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
> >                },{
> >                    "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
> >                } ]
> >        },
> >        "pci/0000:82:00.1": {
> >            "reload_action_stats": [ {
> >                    "driver_reinit": 1
> >                },{
> >                    "fw_activate": 1
> >                },{
> >                    "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
> >                },{
> >                    "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
> >                } ]
> >        }
> >    }
> >}
> >
> 
> [..]
Jiri Pirko Sept. 15, 2020, 7:44 a.m. UTC | #3
Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:45:19AM CEST, idosch@idosch.org wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:45:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:51AM CEST, moshe@mellanox.com wrote:
>> >Expose devlink reload actions stats to the user through devlink dev
>> >get command.
>> >
>> >Examples:
>> >$ devlink dev show
>> >pci/0000:82:00.0:
>> >  reload_action_stats:
>> >    driver_reinit 2
>> >    fw_activate 1
>> >    driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>> >    fw_activate_no_reset 0
>> >pci/0000:82:00.1:
>> >  reload_action_stats:
>> >    driver_reinit 1
>> >    fw_activate 1
>> >    driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>> >    fw_activate_no_reset 0
>> 
>> I would rather have something like:
>>    stats:
>>      reload_action:
>>        driver_reinit 1
>>        fw_activate 1
>>        driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>>        fw_activate_no_reset 0
>> 
>> Then we can easily extend and add other stats in the tree.
>> 
>> 
>> Also, I wonder if these stats could be somehow merged with Ido's metrics
>> work:
>> https://github.com/idosch/linux/commits/submit/devlink_metric_rfc_v1
>> 
>> Ido, would it make sense?
>
>I guess. My original idea for devlink-metric was to expose
>design-specific metrics to user space where the entity registering the
>metrics is the device driver. In this case the entity would be devlink
>itself and it would be auto-registered for each device.

Yeah, the usecase is different, but it is still stats, right.


>
>> 
>> 
>> >
>> >$ devlink dev show -jp
>> >{
>> >    "dev": {
>> >        "pci/0000:82:00.0": {
>> >            "reload_action_stats": [ {
>> >                    "driver_reinit": 2
>> >                },{
>> >                    "fw_activate": 1
>> >                },{
>> >                    "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>> >                },{
>> >                    "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>> >                } ]
>> >        },
>> >        "pci/0000:82:00.1": {
>> >            "reload_action_stats": [ {
>> >                    "driver_reinit": 1
>> >                },{
>> >                    "fw_activate": 1
>> >                },{
>> >                    "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>> >                },{
>> >                    "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>> >                } ]
>> >        }
>> >    }
>> >}
>> >
>> 
>> [..]
Moshe Shemesh Sept. 15, 2020, 12:31 p.m. UTC | #4
On 9/15/2020 10:44 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:45:19AM CEST, idosch@idosch.org wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:45:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:51AM CEST, moshe@mellanox.com wrote:
>>>> Expose devlink reload actions stats to the user through devlink dev
>>>> get command.
>>>>
>>>> Examples:
>>>> $ devlink dev show
>>>> pci/0000:82:00.0:
>>>>   reload_action_stats:
>>>>     driver_reinit 2
>>>>     fw_activate 1
>>>>     driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>>>>     fw_activate_no_reset 0
>>>> pci/0000:82:00.1:
>>>>   reload_action_stats:
>>>>     driver_reinit 1
>>>>     fw_activate 1
>>>>     driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>>>>     fw_activate_no_reset 0
>>> I would rather have something like:
>>>     stats:
>>>       reload_action:
>>>         driver_reinit 1
>>>         fw_activate 1
>>>         driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>>>         fw_activate_no_reset 0
>>>
>>> Then we can easily extend and add other stats in the tree.


Sure, I will add it.

>>>
>>> Also, I wonder if these stats could be somehow merged with Ido's metrics
>>> work:
>>> https://github.com/idosch/linux/commits/submit/devlink_metric_rfc_v1
>>>
>>> Ido, would it make sense?
>> I guess. My original idea for devlink-metric was to expose
>> design-specific metrics to user space where the entity registering the
>> metrics is the device driver. In this case the entity would be devlink
>> itself and it would be auto-registered for each device.
> Yeah, the usecase is different, but it is still stats, right.
>
>
>>>
>>>> $ devlink dev show -jp
>>>> {
>>>>     "dev": {
>>>>         "pci/0000:82:00.0": {
>>>>             "reload_action_stats": [ {
>>>>                     "driver_reinit": 2
>>>>                 },{
>>>>                     "fw_activate": 1
>>>>                 },{
>>>>                     "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>>>>                 },{
>>>>                     "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>>>>                 } ]
>>>>         },
>>>>         "pci/0000:82:00.1": {
>>>>             "reload_action_stats": [ {
>>>>                     "driver_reinit": 1
>>>>                 },{
>>>>                     "fw_activate": 1
>>>>                 },{
>>>>                     "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>>>>                 },{
>>>>                     "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>>>>                 } ]
>>>>         }
>>>>     }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>> [..]
Jiri Pirko Sept. 15, 2020, 1:34 p.m. UTC | #5
Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:31:38PM CEST, moshe@nvidia.com wrote:
>
>On 9/15/2020 10:44 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:45:19AM CEST, idosch@idosch.org wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:45:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > > Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:51AM CEST, moshe@mellanox.com wrote:
>> > > > Expose devlink reload actions stats to the user through devlink dev
>> > > > get command.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Examples:
>> > > > $ devlink dev show
>> > > > pci/0000:82:00.0:
>> > > >   reload_action_stats:
>> > > >     driver_reinit 2
>> > > >     fw_activate 1
>> > > >     driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>> > > >     fw_activate_no_reset 0
>> > > > pci/0000:82:00.1:
>> > > >   reload_action_stats:
>> > > >     driver_reinit 1
>> > > >     fw_activate 1
>> > > >     driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>> > > >     fw_activate_no_reset 0
>> > > I would rather have something like:
>> > >     stats:
>> > >       reload_action:
>> > >         driver_reinit 1
>> > >         fw_activate 1
>> > >         driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>> > >         fw_activate_no_reset 0
>> > > 
>> > > Then we can easily extend and add other stats in the tree.
>
>
>Sure, I will add it.

Could you please checkout the metrics patchset and figure out how to
merge that with your usecase?


>
>> > > 
>> > > Also, I wonder if these stats could be somehow merged with Ido's metrics
>> > > work:
>> > > https://github.com/idosch/linux/commits/submit/devlink_metric_rfc_v1
>> > > 
>> > > Ido, would it make sense?
>> > I guess. My original idea for devlink-metric was to expose
>> > design-specific metrics to user space where the entity registering the
>> > metrics is the device driver. In this case the entity would be devlink
>> > itself and it would be auto-registered for each device.
>> Yeah, the usecase is different, but it is still stats, right.
>> 
>> 
>> > > 
>> > > > $ devlink dev show -jp
>> > > > {
>> > > >     "dev": {
>> > > >         "pci/0000:82:00.0": {
>> > > >             "reload_action_stats": [ {
>> > > >                     "driver_reinit": 2
>> > > >                 },{
>> > > >                     "fw_activate": 1
>> > > >                 },{
>> > > >                     "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>> > > >                 },{
>> > > >                     "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>> > > >                 } ]
>> > > >         },
>> > > >         "pci/0000:82:00.1": {
>> > > >             "reload_action_stats": [ {
>> > > >                     "driver_reinit": 1
>> > > >                 },{
>> > > >                     "fw_activate": 1
>> > > >                 },{
>> > > >                     "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>> > > >                 },{
>> > > >                     "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>> > > >                 } ]
>> > > >         }
>> > > >     }
>> > > > }
>> > > > 
>> > > [..]
Moshe Shemesh Sept. 15, 2020, 8:33 p.m. UTC | #6
On 9/15/2020 4:34 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:31:38PM CEST, moshe@nvidia.com wrote:
>> On 9/15/2020 10:44 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:45:19AM CEST, idosch@idosch.org wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:45:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>>> Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:51AM CEST, moshe@mellanox.com wrote:
>>>>>> Expose devlink reload actions stats to the user through devlink dev
>>>>>> get command.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Examples:
>>>>>> $ devlink dev show
>>>>>> pci/0000:82:00.0:
>>>>>>    reload_action_stats:
>>>>>>      driver_reinit 2
>>>>>>      fw_activate 1
>>>>>>      driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>>>>>>      fw_activate_no_reset 0
>>>>>> pci/0000:82:00.1:
>>>>>>    reload_action_stats:
>>>>>>      driver_reinit 1
>>>>>>      fw_activate 1
>>>>>>      driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>>>>>>      fw_activate_no_reset 0
>>>>> I would rather have something like:
>>>>>      stats:
>>>>>        reload_action:
>>>>>          driver_reinit 1
>>>>>          fw_activate 1
>>>>>          driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>>>>>          fw_activate_no_reset 0
>>>>>
>>>>> Then we can easily extend and add other stats in the tree.
>>
>> Sure, I will add it.
> Could you please checkout the metrics patchset and figure out how to
> merge that with your usecase?
>

I will check, I will discuss with Ido how it will fit.

>>>>> Also, I wonder if these stats could be somehow merged with Ido's metrics
>>>>> work:
>>>>> https://github.com/idosch/linux/commits/submit/devlink_metric_rfc_v1
>>>>>
>>>>> Ido, would it make sense?
>>>> I guess. My original idea for devlink-metric was to expose
>>>> design-specific metrics to user space where the entity registering the
>>>> metrics is the device driver. In this case the entity would be devlink
>>>> itself and it would be auto-registered for each device.
>>> Yeah, the usecase is different, but it is still stats, right.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> $ devlink dev show -jp
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>      "dev": {
>>>>>>          "pci/0000:82:00.0": {
>>>>>>              "reload_action_stats": [ {
>>>>>>                      "driver_reinit": 2
>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>                      "fw_activate": 1
>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>                      "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>                      "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>>>>>>                  } ]
>>>>>>          },
>>>>>>          "pci/0000:82:00.1": {
>>>>>>              "reload_action_stats": [ {
>>>>>>                      "driver_reinit": 1
>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>                      "fw_activate": 1
>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>                      "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>                      "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>>>>>>                  } ]
>>>>>>          }
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>> [..]
Moshe Shemesh Sept. 18, 2020, 4:13 p.m. UTC | #7
On 9/15/2020 11:33 PM, Moshe Shemesh wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 9/15/2020 4:34 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:31:38PM CEST, moshe@nvidia.com wrote:
>>> On 9/15/2020 10:44 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>> Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:45:19AM CEST, idosch@idosch.org wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:45:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>>>> Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:51AM CEST, moshe@mellanox.com wrote:
>>>>>>> Expose devlink reload actions stats to the user through devlink dev
>>>>>>> get command.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Examples:
>>>>>>> $ devlink dev show
>>>>>>> pci/0000:82:00.0:
>>>>>>>    reload_action_stats:
>>>>>>>      driver_reinit 2
>>>>>>>      fw_activate 1
>>>>>>>      driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>>>>>>>      fw_activate_no_reset 0
>>>>>>> pci/0000:82:00.1:
>>>>>>>    reload_action_stats:
>>>>>>>      driver_reinit 1
>>>>>>>      fw_activate 1
>>>>>>>      driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>>>>>>>      fw_activate_no_reset 0
>>>>>> I would rather have something like:
>>>>>>      stats:
>>>>>>        reload_action:
>>>>>>          driver_reinit 1
>>>>>>          fw_activate 1
>>>>>>          driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>>>>>>          fw_activate_no_reset 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then we can easily extend and add other stats in the tree.
>>>
>>> Sure, I will add it.
>> Could you please checkout the metrics patchset and figure out how to
>> merge that with your usecase?
>>
>
> I will check, I will discuss with Ido how it will fit.
>

I have discussed it with Ido, it doesn't fit to merge with metrics:

1. These counters are maintained by devlink unlike metrics which are 
read by the driver from HW.

2. The metrics counters push string name, while here I use enum.

However, I did add another level as you suggested here for option to 
future stats that may fit.

>>>>>> Also, I wonder if these stats could be somehow merged with Ido's 
>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>> work:
>>>>>> https://github.com/idosch/linux/commits/submit/devlink_metric_rfc_v1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ido, would it make sense?
>>>>> I guess. My original idea for devlink-metric was to expose
>>>>> design-specific metrics to user space where the entity registering 
>>>>> the
>>>>> metrics is the device driver. In this case the entity would be 
>>>>> devlink
>>>>> itself and it would be auto-registered for each device.
>>>> Yeah, the usecase is different, but it is still stats, right.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> $ devlink dev show -jp
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>      "dev": {
>>>>>>>          "pci/0000:82:00.0": {
>>>>>>>              "reload_action_stats": [ {
>>>>>>>                      "driver_reinit": 2
>>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>>                      "fw_activate": 1
>>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>>                      "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>>                      "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>>>>>>>                  } ]
>>>>>>>          },
>>>>>>>          "pci/0000:82:00.1": {
>>>>>>>              "reload_action_stats": [ {
>>>>>>>                      "driver_reinit": 1
>>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>>                      "fw_activate": 1
>>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>>                      "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>>>>>>>                  },{
>>>>>>>                      "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>>>>>>>                  } ]
>>>>>>>          }
>>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> [..]
Jiri Pirko Sept. 21, 2020, 10:33 a.m. UTC | #8
Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 06:13:59PM CEST, moshe@nvidia.com wrote:
>
>On 9/15/2020 11:33 PM, Moshe Shemesh wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/15/2020 4:34 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:31:38PM CEST, moshe@nvidia.com wrote:
>> > > On 9/15/2020 10:44 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > > > Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:45:19AM CEST, idosch@idosch.org wrote:
>> > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:45:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > > > > > Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:51AM CEST, moshe@mellanox.com wrote:
>> > > > > > > Expose devlink reload actions stats to the user through devlink dev
>> > > > > > > get command.
>> > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > Examples:
>> > > > > > > $ devlink dev show
>> > > > > > > pci/0000:82:00.0:
>> > > > > > >    reload_action_stats:
>> > > > > > >      driver_reinit 2
>> > > > > > >      fw_activate 1
>> > > > > > >      driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>> > > > > > >      fw_activate_no_reset 0
>> > > > > > > pci/0000:82:00.1:
>> > > > > > >    reload_action_stats:
>> > > > > > >      driver_reinit 1
>> > > > > > >      fw_activate 1
>> > > > > > >      driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>> > > > > > >      fw_activate_no_reset 0
>> > > > > > I would rather have something like:
>> > > > > >      stats:
>> > > > > >        reload_action:
>> > > > > >          driver_reinit 1
>> > > > > >          fw_activate 1
>> > > > > >          driver_reinit_no_reset 0
>> > > > > >          fw_activate_no_reset 0
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > Then we can easily extend and add other stats in the tree.
>> > > 
>> > > Sure, I will add it.
>> > Could you please checkout the metrics patchset and figure out how to
>> > merge that with your usecase?
>> > 
>> 
>> I will check, I will discuss with Ido how it will fit.
>> 
>
>I have discussed it with Ido, it doesn't fit to merge with metrics:
>
>1. These counters are maintained by devlink unlike metrics which are read by
>the driver from HW.

Okay.

>
>2. The metrics counters push string name, while here I use enum.
>
>However, I did add another level as you suggested here for option to future
>stats that may fit.
>
>> > > > > > Also, I wonder if these stats could be somehow merged
>> > > > > > with Ido's metrics
>> > > > > > work:
>> > > > > > https://github.com/idosch/linux/commits/submit/devlink_metric_rfc_v1
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > Ido, would it make sense?
>> > > > > I guess. My original idea for devlink-metric was to expose
>> > > > > design-specific metrics to user space where the entity
>> > > > > registering the
>> > > > > metrics is the device driver. In this case the entity
>> > > > > would be devlink
>> > > > > itself and it would be auto-registered for each device.
>> > > > Yeah, the usecase is different, but it is still stats, right.
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > > > > $ devlink dev show -jp
>> > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > >      "dev": {
>> > > > > > >          "pci/0000:82:00.0": {
>> > > > > > >              "reload_action_stats": [ {
>> > > > > > >                      "driver_reinit": 2
>> > > > > > >                  },{
>> > > > > > >                      "fw_activate": 1
>> > > > > > >                  },{
>> > > > > > >                      "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>> > > > > > >                  },{
>> > > > > > >                      "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>> > > > > > >                  } ]
>> > > > > > >          },
>> > > > > > >          "pci/0000:82:00.1": {
>> > > > > > >              "reload_action_stats": [ {
>> > > > > > >                      "driver_reinit": 1
>> > > > > > >                  },{
>> > > > > > >                      "fw_activate": 1
>> > > > > > >                  },{
>> > > > > > >                      "driver_reinit_no_reset": 0
>> > > > > > >                  },{
>> > > > > > >                      "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>> > > > > > >                  } ]
>> > > > > > >          }
>> > > > > > >      }
>> > > > > > > }
>> > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > [..]
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
index b19686fd80ff..ac9be467d243 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@  enum devlink_attr {
 	DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION,		/* u8 */
 	DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTIONS_PERFORMED,	/* nested */
 	DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL,	/* u8 */
+	DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_STATS,	/* nested */
+	DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_STAT,	/* nested */
+	DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_STAT_VALUE,	/* u32 */
 
 	/* add new attributes above here, update the policy in devlink.c */
 
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index cbf746966913..1063b7a4123a 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -462,6 +462,11 @@  static int devlink_nl_put_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool devlink_reload_supported(struct devlink *devlink)
+{
+	return devlink->ops->reload_down && devlink->ops->reload_up;
+}
+
 static bool
 devlink_reload_action_is_supported(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action)
 {
@@ -479,7 +484,9 @@  static int devlink_nl_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
 			   enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
 			   u32 seq, int flags)
 {
+	struct nlattr *reload_action_stats, *reload_action_stat;
+	int i, j, stat_idx;
 	void *hdr;
 
 	hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, portid, seq, &devlink_nl_family, flags, cmd);
 	if (!hdr)
@@ -490,9 +497,42 @@  static int devlink_nl_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
 	if (nla_put_u8(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_FAILED, devlink->reload_failed))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
 
+	if (!devlink_reload_supported(devlink))
+		goto out;
+
+	reload_action_stats = nla_nest_start(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_STATS);
+	if (!reload_action_stats)
+		goto nla_put_failure;
+
+	for (j = 0; j <= DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_MAX; j++) {
+		if (!devlink_reload_action_limit_level_is_supported(devlink, j))
+			continue;
+		for (i = 0; i <= DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX; i++) {
+			if (!devlink_reload_action_is_supported(devlink, i))
+				continue;
+			reload_action_stat = nla_nest_start(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_STAT);
+			if (!reload_action_stat)
+				goto reload_action_stats_nest_cancel;
+			if (nla_put_u8(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION, i))
+				goto reload_action_stat_nest_cancel;
+			if (nla_put_u8(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL, j))
+				goto reload_action_stat_nest_cancel;
+			stat_idx = j * __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX + i;
+			if (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_STAT_VALUE,
+					devlink->reload_action_stats[stat_idx]))
+				goto reload_action_stat_nest_cancel;
+			nla_nest_end(msg, reload_action_stat);
+		}
+		nla_nest_end(msg, reload_action_stats);
+	}
+out:
 	genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
 	return 0;
 
+reload_action_stat_nest_cancel:
+	nla_nest_cancel(msg, reload_action_stat);
+reload_action_stats_nest_cancel:
+	nla_nest_cancel(msg, reload_action_stats);
 nla_put_failure:
 	genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
 	return -EMSGSIZE;
@@ -2961,11 +3001,6 @@  static void devlink_reload_netns_change(struct devlink *devlink,
 				     DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_NEW);
 }
 
-static bool devlink_reload_supported(const struct devlink *devlink)
-{
-	return devlink->ops->reload_down && devlink->ops->reload_up;
-}
-
 static void devlink_reload_failed_set(struct devlink *devlink,
 				      bool reload_failed)
 {