| Message ID | 1311982230-10543-1-git-send-email-anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
From: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:30:30 -0700 > Please apply the series to net-next. Thanks. Queued up for net-next -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Aug 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com> > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:30:30 -0700 > >> Please apply the series to net-next. Thanks. > > Queued up for net-next Would it be too much of a trouble to push these to net-2.6, as these are minor bug fixes anyway? Thanks a lot. -Anirban -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:24:04 -0700 > > On Aug 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com> >> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:30:30 -0700 >> >>> Please apply the series to net-next. Thanks. >> >> Queued up for net-next > > Would it be too much of a trouble to push these to net-2.6, as these are minor bug fixes anyway? No. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Aug 1, 2011, at 5:38 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com> > Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:24:04 -0700 > >> >> On Aug 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, David Miller wrote: >> >>> From: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com> >>> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:30:30 -0700 >>> >>>> Please apply the series to net-next. Thanks. >>> >>> Queued up for net-next >> >> Would it be too much of a trouble to push these to net-2.6, as these are minor bug fixes anyway? > > No. Do you want me to resend the patch series for net-2.6? It was my mistake to specify net-next instead of net-2.6 Thanks. -Anirban -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:20:00 -0700 > Do you want me to resend the patch series for net-2.6? It was my > mistake to specify net-next instead of net-2.6 The debug support patches are not appropriate for plain 'net', only the pure most critical bug fixes are. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/net/qlcnic/qlcnic_hw.c b/drivers/net/qlcnic/qlcnic_hw.c index 4055c21..74e9d7b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/qlcnic/qlcnic_hw.c +++ b/drivers/net/qlcnic/qlcnic_hw.c @@ -1773,8 +1773,8 @@ int qlcnic_dump_fw(struct qlcnic_adapter *adapter) goto error; } else { fw_dump->clr = 1; - snprintf(mesg, sizeof(mesg), "FW dump for device: %d\n", - adapter->pdev->devfn); + snprintf(mesg, sizeof(mesg), "FW_DUMP=%s", + adapter->netdev->name); dev_info(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Dump data, %d bytes captured\n", fw_dump->size); /* Send a udev event to notify availability of FW dump */
Driver was not generating the environment variable for the FW dump event correctly. Fix it by formatting it properly. Signed-off-by: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com> --- drivers/net/qlcnic/qlcnic_hw.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)