Message ID | 20200814131627.32021-1-maximmi@mellanox.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ethtool-netlink bug fixes | expand |
On 8/14/2020 6:16 AM, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote: > This series contains a few bug fixes for ethtool-netlink. These bugs are > specific for the netlink interface, and the legacy ioctl interface is > not affected. These patches aim to have the same behavior in > ethtool-netlink as in the legacy ethtool. > > Please also see the sibling series for the userspace tool. Since you are targeting the net tree, should not those changes also have corresponding Fixes tag? Thanks > > Maxim Mikityanskiy (3): > ethtool: Fix preserving of wanted feature bits in netlink interface > ethtool: Account for hw_features in netlink interface > ethtool: Don't omit the netlink reply if no features were changed > > net/ethtool/features.c | 19 ++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 07:58:29 -0700 > > > On 8/14/2020 6:16 AM, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote: >> This series contains a few bug fixes for ethtool-netlink. These bugs >> are >> specific for the netlink interface, and the legacy ioctl interface is >> not affected. These patches aim to have the same behavior in >> ethtool-netlink as in the legacy ethtool. >> Please also see the sibling series for the userspace tool. > > Since you are targeting the net tree, should not those changes also > have corresponding Fixes tag? Yes, they definitely should.