mbox series

[net-next,00/14] Phylink PCS updates

Message ID 20200721110152.GY1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk
Headers show
Series Phylink PCS updates | expand

Message

Russell King (Oracle) July 21, 2020, 11:01 a.m. UTC
Hi,

This series updates the rudimentary phylink PCS support with the
results of the last four months of development of that.  Phylink
PCS support was initially added back at the end of March, when it
became clear that the current approach of treating everything at
the MAC end as being part of the MAC was inadequate.

However, this rudimentary implementation was fine initially for
mvneta and similar, but in practice had a fair number of issues,
particularly when ethtool interfaces were used to change various
link properties.

It became apparent that relying on the phylink_config structure for
the PCS was also bad when it became clear that the same PCS was used
in DSA drivers as well as in NXPs other offerings, and there was a
desire to re-use that code.

It also became apparent that splitting the "configuration" step on
an interface mode configuration between the MAC and PCS using just
mac_config() and pcs_config() methods was not sufficient for some
setups, as the MAC needed to be "taken down" prior to making changes,
and once all settings were complete, the MAC could only then be
resumed.

This series addresses these points, progressing PCS support, and
has been developed with mvneta and DPAA2 setups, with work on both
those drivers to prove this approach.  It has been rigorously tested
with mvneta, as that provides the most flexibility for testing the
various code paths.

To solve the phylink_config reuse problem, we introduce a struct
phylink_pcs, which contains the minimal information necessary, and it
is intended that this is embedded in the PCS private data structure.

To solve the interface mode configuration problem, we introduce two
new MAC methods, mac_prepare() and mac_finish() which wrap the entire
interface mode configuration only.  This has the additional benefit of
relieving MAC drivers from working out whether an interface change has
occurred, and whether they need to do some major work.

I have not yet updated all the interface documentation for these
changes yet, that work remains, but this patch set is provided in the
hope that those working on PCS support in NXP will find this useful.

Since there is a lot of change here, this is the reason why I strongly
advise that everyone has converted to the mac_link_up() way of
configuring the link parameters when the link comes up, rather than
the old way of using mac_config() - especially as splitting the PCS
changes how and when phylink calls mac_config(). Although no change
for existing users is intended, that is something I no longer am able
to test.

Changes since RFC:
- fix bisect build failure
- add patch to use config.an_enabled
- rename phylink_config_interface to phylink_major_reconfig
- add expanded documentation for phylink_set_pcs()

 drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 372 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 include/linux/phylink.h   | 103 ++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 344 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)

Comments

David Miller July 21, 2020, 10:47 p.m. UTC | #1
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:01:52 +0100

> This series updates the rudimentary phylink PCS support with the
> results of the last four months of development of that.  Phylink
> PCS support was initially added back at the end of March, when it
> became clear that the current approach of treating everything at
> the MAC end as being part of the MAC was inadequate.
> 
> However, this rudimentary implementation was fine initially for
> mvneta and similar, but in practice had a fair number of issues,
> particularly when ethtool interfaces were used to change various
> link properties.
> 
> It became apparent that relying on the phylink_config structure for
> the PCS was also bad when it became clear that the same PCS was used
> in DSA drivers as well as in NXPs other offerings, and there was a
> desire to re-use that code.
> 
> It also became apparent that splitting the "configuration" step on
> an interface mode configuration between the MAC and PCS using just
> mac_config() and pcs_config() methods was not sufficient for some
> setups, as the MAC needed to be "taken down" prior to making changes,
> and once all settings were complete, the MAC could only then be
> resumed.
> 
> This series addresses these points, progressing PCS support, and
> has been developed with mvneta and DPAA2 setups, with work on both
> those drivers to prove this approach.  It has been rigorously tested
> with mvneta, as that provides the most flexibility for testing the
> various code paths.
 ...

Series applied, thank you.