Message ID | 20200522213059.1535892-3-jeremy.linton@arm.com |
---|---|
State | RFC |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
Series | Make C45 autoprobe more robust | expand |
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:30:50PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: > Since we are already checking for *devs == 0 after > the loop terminates, we can add a mostly F's check > as well. With that change we can simplify the return/break > sequence inside the loop. > > Add a valid_phy_id() macro for this, since we will be using it > in a couple other places. I'm not sure you have the name of this correct, and your usage layer in your patch series is correct. > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> > --- > drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 15 +++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c > index 245899b58a7d..7746c07b97fe 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c > @@ -695,6 +695,11 @@ static int get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, int dev_addr, > return 0; > } > > +static bool valid_phy_id(int val) > +{ > + return (val > 0 && ((val & 0x1fffffff) != 0x1fffffff)); > +} > + > /** > * get_phy_c45_ids - reads the specified addr for its 802.3-c45 IDs. > * @bus: the target MII bus > @@ -732,18 +737,12 @@ static int get_phy_c45_ids(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, u32 *phy_id, > phy_reg = get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg(bus, addr, 0, devs); > if (phy_reg < 0) > return -EIO; > - /* no device there, let's get out of here */ > - if ((*devs & 0x1fffffff) == 0x1fffffff) { > - *phy_id = 0xffffffff; > - return 0; > - } else { > - break; > - } > + break; > } > } > > /* no reported devices */ > - if (*devs == 0) { > + if (!valid_phy_id(*devs)) { You are using this to validate the "devices in package" value, not the PHY ID value. So, IMHO this should be called "valid_devs_in_package()" or similar. > *phy_id = 0xffffffff; > return 0; > } > -- > 2.26.2 > >
Hi, On 5/23/20 1:36 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:30:50PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: >> Since we are already checking for *devs == 0 after >> the loop terminates, we can add a mostly F's check >> as well. With that change we can simplify the return/break >> sequence inside the loop. >> >> Add a valid_phy_id() macro for this, since we will be using it >> in a couple other places. > > I'm not sure you have the name of this correct, and your usage layer > in your patch series is correct. Or the name is poor.. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 15 +++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c >> index 245899b58a7d..7746c07b97fe 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c >> @@ -695,6 +695,11 @@ static int get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, int dev_addr, >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static bool valid_phy_id(int val) >> +{ >> + return (val > 0 && ((val & 0x1fffffff) != 0x1fffffff)); >> +} >> + >> /** >> * get_phy_c45_ids - reads the specified addr for its 802.3-c45 IDs. >> * @bus: the target MII bus >> @@ -732,18 +737,12 @@ static int get_phy_c45_ids(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, u32 *phy_id, >> phy_reg = get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg(bus, addr, 0, devs); >> if (phy_reg < 0) >> return -EIO; >> - /* no device there, let's get out of here */ >> - if ((*devs & 0x1fffffff) == 0x1fffffff) { >> - *phy_id = 0xffffffff; >> - return 0; >> - } else { >> - break; >> - } >> + break; >> } >> } >> >> /* no reported devices */ >> - if (*devs == 0) { >> + if (!valid_phy_id(*devs)) { > > You are using this to validate the "devices in package" value, not the > PHY ID value. So, IMHO this should be called "valid_devs_in_package()" > or similar. Hmmm, its more "valid_phy_reg()" since it ends up being used to validate both the devs in package as well as phy id. > >> *phy_id = 0xffffffff; >> return 0; >> } >> -- >> 2.26.2 >> >> >
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 09:48:55PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: > Hi, > > On 5/23/20 1:36 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:30:50PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: > > > Since we are already checking for *devs == 0 after > > > the loop terminates, we can add a mostly F's check > > > as well. With that change we can simplify the return/break > > > sequence inside the loop. > > > > > > Add a valid_phy_id() macro for this, since we will be using it > > > in a couple other places. > > > > I'm not sure you have the name of this correct, and your usage layer > > in your patch series is correct. > > Or the name is poor.. > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 15 +++++++-------- > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c > > > index 245899b58a7d..7746c07b97fe 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c > > > @@ -695,6 +695,11 @@ static int get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, int dev_addr, > > > return 0; > > > } > > > +static bool valid_phy_id(int val) > > > +{ > > > + return (val > 0 && ((val & 0x1fffffff) != 0x1fffffff)); > > > +} > > > + > > > /** > > > * get_phy_c45_ids - reads the specified addr for its 802.3-c45 IDs. > > > * @bus: the target MII bus > > > @@ -732,18 +737,12 @@ static int get_phy_c45_ids(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, u32 *phy_id, > > > phy_reg = get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg(bus, addr, 0, devs); > > > if (phy_reg < 0) > > > return -EIO; > > > - /* no device there, let's get out of here */ > > > - if ((*devs & 0x1fffffff) == 0x1fffffff) { > > > - *phy_id = 0xffffffff; > > > - return 0; > > > - } else { > > > - break; > > > - } > > > + break; > > > } > > > } > > > /* no reported devices */ > > > - if (*devs == 0) { > > > + if (!valid_phy_id(*devs)) { > > > > You are using this to validate the "devices in package" value, not the > > PHY ID value. So, IMHO this should be called "valid_devs_in_package()" > > or similar. > > Hmmm, its more "valid_phy_reg()" since it ends up being used to validate > both the devs in package as well as phy id. I don't think that is a valid use of the code you've put in valid_phy_id().
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c index 245899b58a7d..7746c07b97fe 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c @@ -695,6 +695,11 @@ static int get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, int dev_addr, return 0; } +static bool valid_phy_id(int val) +{ + return (val > 0 && ((val & 0x1fffffff) != 0x1fffffff)); +} + /** * get_phy_c45_ids - reads the specified addr for its 802.3-c45 IDs. * @bus: the target MII bus @@ -732,18 +737,12 @@ static int get_phy_c45_ids(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, u32 *phy_id, phy_reg = get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg(bus, addr, 0, devs); if (phy_reg < 0) return -EIO; - /* no device there, let's get out of here */ - if ((*devs & 0x1fffffff) == 0x1fffffff) { - *phy_id = 0xffffffff; - return 0; - } else { - break; - } + break; } } /* no reported devices */ - if (*devs == 0) { + if (!valid_phy_id(*devs)) { *phy_id = 0xffffffff; return 0; }
Since we are already checking for *devs == 0 after the loop terminates, we can add a mostly F's check as well. With that change we can simplify the return/break sequence inside the loop. Add a valid_phy_id() macro for this, since we will be using it in a couple other places. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> --- drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 15 +++++++-------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)