Message ID | 20110707173016.GB9805@thinkpad-t410 |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 07/07/2011 11:30 AM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> git://kernel.ubuntu.com/sforshee/ubuntu-natty.git acer-wmi
What is the state of 'acer-wmi: Only update rfkill status for associated
hotkey events' ? Is that patch working its way upstream ?
rtg
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:45:06PM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote: > On 07/07/2011 11:30 AM, Seth Forshee wrote: > >git://kernel.ubuntu.com/sforshee/ubuntu-natty.git acer-wmi > > What is the state of 'acer-wmi: Only update rfkill status for > associated hotkey events' ? Is that patch working its way upstream ? Yes. It's sitting in Matthew Garrett's for_linus branch. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mjg59/platform-drivers-x86.git;a=commit;h=92530664bbe5a13aede4a8763459bbe560ad9221
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:27:47PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:45:06PM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote: > > On 07/07/2011 11:30 AM, Seth Forshee wrote: > > >git://kernel.ubuntu.com/sforshee/ubuntu-natty.git acer-wmi > > > > What is the state of 'acer-wmi: Only update rfkill status for > > associated hotkey events' ? Is that patch working its way upstream ? > > Yes. It's sitting in Matthew Garrett's for_linus branch. > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mjg59/platform-drivers-x86.git;a=commit;h=92530664bbe5a13aede4a8763459bbe560ad9221 Hrm, I just noticed that I had pushed a stale version of that patch with an extraneous break statement. Guess I must have grabbed an old version when I was reworking the branch to remove an unneeded patch. I updated the branch with the correct version, so make sure you get that one instead of the patch I pushed originally. I double-checked the other two patches, and they are correct.
On 07/07/2011 02:27 PM, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:45:06PM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote: >> On 07/07/2011 11:30 AM, Seth Forshee wrote: >>> git://kernel.ubuntu.com/sforshee/ubuntu-natty.git acer-wmi >> >> What is the state of 'acer-wmi: Only update rfkill status for >> associated hotkey events' ? Is that patch working its way upstream ? > > Yes. It's sitting in Matthew Garrett's for_linus branch. > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mjg59/platform-drivers-x86.git;a=commit;h=92530664bbe5a13aede4a8763459bbe560ad9221 Is that gonna land in 3.0 or 3.1 ? My preference would be to wait until the patch makes its way upstream in its final form. rtg
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:52:40AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote: > On 07/07/2011 02:27 PM, Seth Forshee wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:45:06PM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote: > >>On 07/07/2011 11:30 AM, Seth Forshee wrote: > >>>git://kernel.ubuntu.com/sforshee/ubuntu-natty.git acer-wmi > >> > >>What is the state of 'acer-wmi: Only update rfkill status for > >>associated hotkey events' ? Is that patch working its way upstream ? > > > >Yes. It's sitting in Matthew Garrett's for_linus branch. > > > >http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mjg59/platform-drivers-x86.git;a=commit;h=92530664bbe5a13aede4a8763459bbe560ad9221 > > Is that gonna land in 3.0 or 3.1 ? My preference would be to wait > until the patch makes its way upstream in its final form. This one should be landing in 3.0, as it's fixing a regression, so I'll resend after Linus merges it. Thanks.