Message ID | 20110707162911.GL5783@atomide.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Thursday 07 July 2011 18:29:11 Tony Lindgren wrote: > Please pull omap board updates from: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git devel-board > > These are currently on top of the fixes you pulled earlier but > could be also rebased on the earlier cleanup if you prefer that. I would generally prefer them to be independent, even if that causes minor conflicts. If some branches are built on top of others, that mainly means I have to remember the order in which to send them upstream, and my memory for these things is limited. > Please note that the board-cm-t35.c change will need a minor fix > when merging with the atag_offset patch series. In MACHINE_START > the .boot_params needs to be replaced with .atag_offset = 0x100. > > Also note that this series is missing the Nook Color board > support as that one is waiting on the machine_id patch. Ok Thanks, Arnd
* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [110707 13:36]: > On Thursday 07 July 2011 18:29:11 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Please pull omap board updates from: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git devel-board > > > > These are currently on top of the fixes you pulled earlier but > > could be also rebased on the earlier cleanup if you prefer that. > > I would generally prefer them to be independent, even if that causes > minor conflicts. If some branches are built on top of others, that > mainly means I have to remember the order in which to send them > upstream, and my memory for these things is limited. Sure. So let's wait on this one a bit. I'll send you some more cleanup first as I just noticed that the TWL cleanup series will conflict with these patches. I need to base these board files on all the cleanup though, otherwise things will get messy with merge and build conflicts. Unfortunately there will be dependencies between branches until we have the driver probe and bus (hwmod) code initializing things using device tree data.. Regards, Tony
On Friday 08 July 2011 10:30:42 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [110707 13:36]: > > On Thursday 07 July 2011 18:29:11 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Please pull omap board updates from: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git devel-board > > > > > > These are currently on top of the fixes you pulled earlier but > > > could be also rebased on the earlier cleanup if you prefer that. > > > > I would generally prefer them to be independent, even if that causes > > minor conflicts. If some branches are built on top of others, that > > mainly means I have to remember the order in which to send them > > upstream, and my memory for these things is limited. > > Sure. So let's wait on this one a bit. I'll send you some more cleanup > first as I just noticed that the TWL cleanup series will conflict with > these patches. Sorry for being unclear, I forgot to say that I did in fact pull your tree already. > I need to base these board files on all the cleanup though, otherwise > things will get messy with merge and build conflicts. > > Unfortunately there will be dependencies between branches until we > have the driver probe and bus (hwmod) code initializing things > using device tree data.. I already need to stage things out a bit, because the omap fixes depend on the omap cleanups, while the imx cleanups depend on the pxa fixes. So it's likely going to be something like * fixes * cleanup * more fixes * more cleanup * new subarchitectures * new boards * wait for devicetree to get pulled in * more cleanups based on device tree * other new features Arnd
* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [110708 01:49]: > On Friday 08 July 2011 10:30:42 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [110707 13:36]: > > > On Thursday 07 July 2011 18:29:11 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Please pull omap board updates from: > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git devel-board > > > > > > > > These are currently on top of the fixes you pulled earlier but > > > > could be also rebased on the earlier cleanup if you prefer that. > > > > > > I would generally prefer them to be independent, even if that causes > > > minor conflicts. If some branches are built on top of others, that > > > mainly means I have to remember the order in which to send them > > > upstream, and my memory for these things is limited. > > > > Sure. So let's wait on this one a bit. I'll send you some more cleanup > > first as I just noticed that the TWL cleanup series will conflict with > > these patches. > > Sorry for being unclear, I forgot to say that I did in fact pull your tree > already. OK no problem that's fine with me. BTW, looks like your tree is no longer showing up on kernel.org? > > I need to base these board files on all the cleanup though, otherwise > > things will get messy with merge and build conflicts. > > > > Unfortunately there will be dependencies between branches until we > > have the driver probe and bus (hwmod) code initializing things > > using device tree data.. > > I already need to stage things out a bit, because the omap fixes > depend on the omap cleanups, while the imx cleanups depend on the > pxa fixes. So it's likely going to be something like > > * fixes > * cleanup > * more fixes > * more cleanup > * new subarchitectures > * new boards > * wait for devicetree to get pulled in > * more cleanups based on device tree > * other new features It's getting messy :) Tony
On Friday 08 July 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [110708 01:49]: > > On Friday 08 July 2011 10:30:42 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Sorry for being unclear, I forgot to say that I did in fact pull your tree > > already. > > OK no problem that's fine with me. > > BTW, looks like your tree is no longer showing up on kernel.org? > The URL has changed (from linux-2.6-arm-soc.git), it's now git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/linux-arm-soc.git We figured that there would never be a 2.6 release in there, so the original name was a bit silly. It won't change again, and if you just change the URL in your remotes list, it should still fast-forward. Arnd
* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [110708 04:06]: > On Friday 08 July 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [110708 01:49]: > > > On Friday 08 July 2011 10:30:42 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > Sorry for being unclear, I forgot to say that I did in fact pull your tree > > > already. > > > > OK no problem that's fine with me. > > > > BTW, looks like your tree is no longer showing up on kernel.org? > > > > The URL has changed (from linux-2.6-arm-soc.git), it's now > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/linux-arm-soc.git > > We figured that there would never be a 2.6 release in there, so the > original name was a bit silly. It won't change again, and if you > just change the URL in your remotes list, it should still fast-forward. OK thanks seems to work now. Tony