Message ID | 20200501101204.364798-1-maz@kernel.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] KVM/arm fixes for 5.7, take #2 | expand |
Hi Marc, Paolo, On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 11:12:00AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > This is the second batch of KVM/arm fixes for 5.7. A compilation fix, > a GICv4.1 fix, plus a couple of sanity checks (SP_EL0 save/restore, > and the sanitising of AArch32 registers). > > Note that the pull request I sent a week ago[1] is still valid, and > that this new series is built on top of the previous one. > > Please pull, I don't see this queued up in the kvm tree, which appears to have been sitting dormant for 10 days. Consequently, there are fixes sitting in limbo and we /still/ don't have a sensible base for arm64/kvm patches targetting 5.8. Paolo -- how can I help get this stuff moving again? I'm more than happy to send this lot up to Linus via arm64 if you're busy atm. Please just let me know. Cheers, Will
On 04/05/20 13:30, Will Deacon wrote: > I don't see this queued up in the kvm tree, which appears to have been > sitting dormant for 10 days. Consequently, there are fixes sitting in > limbo and we /still/ don't have a sensible base for arm64/kvm patches > targetting 5.8. > > Paolo -- how can I help get this stuff moving again? I'm more than happy > to send this lot up to Linus via arm64 if you're busy atm. Please just > let me know. 10 days is one week during which I could hardly work and the two adjacent weekends. So this is basically really bad timing in Marc's first pull request, that he couldn't have anticipated. I have pulled both trees now, so you can base 5.8 development on kvm/master. It will get to Linus in a couple days. Paolo
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 06:05:51PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 04/05/20 13:30, Will Deacon wrote: > > I don't see this queued up in the kvm tree, which appears to have been > > sitting dormant for 10 days. Consequently, there are fixes sitting in > > limbo and we /still/ don't have a sensible base for arm64/kvm patches > > targetting 5.8. > > > > Paolo -- how can I help get this stuff moving again? I'm more than happy > > to send this lot up to Linus via arm64 if you're busy atm. Please just > > let me know. > > 10 days is one week during which I could hardly work and the two > adjacent weekends. So this is basically really bad timing in Marc's > first pull request, that he couldn't have anticipated. Understood, and thanks for the quick reply. If possible, please just let us know in future as we can probably figure something out rather than having things sit in limbo. > I have pulled both trees now, so you can base 5.8 development on > kvm/master. It will get to Linus in a couple days. Thanks, Paolo! Will
On 04/05/20 18:51, Will Deacon wrote: >> 10 days is one week during which I could hardly work and the two >> adjacent weekends. So this is basically really bad timing in Marc's >> first pull request, that he couldn't have anticipated. > > Understood, and thanks for the quick reply. If possible, please just let us > know in future as we can probably figure something out rather than having > things sit in limbo. Indeed, it was my fault. I got stuck in a "1: tomorrow should be better" / "no it was actually worse" / "goto 1b" loop. Paolo