Message ID | 1588151545-9346-1-git-send-email-stephane.viau@oss.nxp.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | imx: add i.MX8M Nano EVK board support | expand |
Hello, On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:12:20 +0200 Stephane Viau <stephane.viau@oss.nxp.com> wrote: > This series adds support for the NXP i.MX8M Nano EVK board. > > Since the i.MX8M Nano CPU was added for the Nitrogen8MNano board, which has a > type of memory (LPDDR4) different from the NXP reference board (DDR4), the first > half of the series introduce the DDR training selection for the whole i.MX8 M > SoC family. > > The second half of the series adds support for i.MX8M Nano EVK Board with kernel/ > U-Boot based on 4.19.35_1.1.0, which is the current preferred version for all NXP > reference boards. Thanks for this new iteration. It was in our patchwork patch tracking system, and it just disappeared. Has anyone removed these patches? You Stephane? Someone else? Thanks, Thomas
> >Hello, > >On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:12:20 +0200 >Stephane Viau <stephane.viau@oss.nxp.com> wrote: > >> This series adds support for the NXP i.MX8M Nano EVK board. >> >> Since the i.MX8M Nano CPU was added for the Nitrogen8MNano board, which has a >> type of memory (LPDDR4) different from the NXP reference board (DDR4), the first >> half of the series introduce the DDR training selection for the whole i.MX8 M >> SoC family. >> >> The second half of the series adds support for i.MX8M Nano EVK Board with kernel/ >> U-Boot based on 4.19.35_1.1.0, which is the current preferred version for all NXP >> reference boards. > >Thanks for this new iteration. It was in our patchwork patch tracking >system, and it just disappeared. Has anyone removed these patches? You >Stephane? Someone else? Hi Thomas, Yeah, sorry about that. It should be back now ; can you please check? Regards, Stephane. > >Thanks, > >Thomas >-- >Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin >Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering >https://bootlin.com >
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:36:31 +0000 "Stephane Viau (OSS)" <stephane.viau@oss.nxp.com> wrote: > >Thanks for this new iteration. It was in our patchwork patch tracking > >system, and it just disappeared. Has anyone removed these patches? You > >Stephane? Someone else? > > Yeah, sorry about that. It should be back now ; can you please check? Confirmed, thanks! Thomas