Message ID | 202004160327.03G3RZLv012120@sdf.org |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
Series | tipc: Remove redundant tsk->published flag | expand |
From: George Spelvin <lkml@sdf.org> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 03:27:35 GMT > @@ -3847,7 +3839,7 @@ int tipc_sk_dump(struct sock *sk, u16 dqueues, char *buf) > size_t sz = (dqueues) ? SK_LMAX : SK_LMIN; > struct tipc_sock *tsk; > struct publication *p; > - bool tsk_connected; > + bool tsk_connected, tsk_published; > Please preserve the reverse christmas tree ordering of local variables here. Thank you.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 03:32:11PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: George Spelvin <lkml@sdf.org> > Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 03:27:35 GMT > >> @@ -3847,7 +3839,7 @@ int tipc_sk_dump(struct sock *sk, u16 dqueues, char *buf) >> size_t sz = (dqueues) ? SK_LMAX : SK_LMIN; >> struct tipc_sock *tsk; >> struct publication *p; >> - bool tsk_connected; >> + bool tsk_connected, tsk_published; >> > > Please preserve the reverse christmas tree ordering of local variables > here. Happy to, but is that actually defined anywhere? "Preserve" implies that it was present before the patch, and I can't infer a rule which is obeyed by the pre-patch declarations: int i = 0; size_t sz = (dqueues) ? SK_LMAX : SK_LMIN; struct tipc_sock *tsk; struct publication *p; bool tsk_connected; One option is to sort by the full line length, including initialization: size_t sz = (dqueues) ? SK_LMAX : SK_LMIN; struct tipc_sock *tsk; struct publication *p; bool tsk_connected; int i = 0; The other is to sort by the *declaration* length: struct tipc_sock *tsk; struct publication *p; bool tsk_connected; size_t sz = (dqueues) ? SK_LMAX : SK_LMIN; int i = 0; Looking at the local variable declarations in the rest of the file isn't producing any clarity. Thank you.
On 4/19/20 4:56 AM, George Spelvin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 03:32:11PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: George Spelvin <lkml@sdf.org> >> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 03:27:35 GMT [...] >> Please preserve the reverse christmas tree ordering of local variables >> here. > Happy to, but is that actually defined anywhere? "Preserve" implies that > it was present before the patch, and I can't infer a rule which is obeyed > by the pre-patch declarations: It all depends on the age of the code. In newer code, we always follow the rule, and when refactoring old code at least I try to adapt to this rule even at the cost of reshuffling a few declarations. It is risk free, - you only have to watch out for dependencies. > int i = 0; > size_t sz = (dqueues) ? SK_LMAX : SK_LMIN; > struct tipc_sock *tsk; > struct publication *p; > bool tsk_connected; > > One option is to sort by the full line length, including initialization: > size_t sz = (dqueues) ? SK_LMAX : SK_LMIN; > struct tipc_sock *tsk; > struct publication *p; > bool tsk_connected; > int i = 0; This is the preferred order, AFAIK. ///jon
diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c index 1118e6815256..70cceb1782ff 100644 --- a/net/tipc/socket.c +++ b/net/tipc/socket.c @@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ struct sockaddr_pair { * @sk: socket - interacts with 'port' and with user via the socket API * @conn_type: TIPC type used when connection was established * @conn_instance: TIPC instance used when connection was established - * @published: non-zero if port has one or more associated names * @max_pkt: maximum packet size "hint" used when building messages sent by port * @maxnagle: maximum size of msg which can be subject to nagle * @portid: unique port identity in TIPC socket hash table @@ -96,7 +95,6 @@ struct tipc_sock { struct sock sk; u32 conn_type; u32 conn_instance; - int published; u32 max_pkt; u32 maxnagle; u32 portid; @@ -1412,7 +1410,7 @@ static int __tipc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t dlen) return -EPIPE; if (sk->sk_state != TIPC_OPEN) return -EISCONN; - if (tsk->published) + if (!list_empty(&tsk->publications)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; if (dest->addrtype == TIPC_ADDR_NAME) { tsk->conn_type = dest->addr.name.name.type; @@ -2824,7 +2822,6 @@ static int tipc_sk_publish(struct tipc_sock *tsk, uint scope, list_add(&publ->binding_sock, &tsk->publications); tsk->pub_count++; - tsk->published = 1; return 0; } @@ -2858,8 +2855,6 @@ static int tipc_sk_withdraw(struct tipc_sock *tsk, uint scope, publ->upper, publ->key); rc = 0; } - if (list_empty(&tsk->publications)) - tsk->published = 0; return rc; } @@ -3743,7 +3738,6 @@ int tipc_nl_publ_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb) bool tipc_sk_filtering(struct sock *sk) { struct tipc_sock *tsk; - struct publication *p; u32 _port, _sktype, _type, _lower, _upper; u32 type = 0, lower = 0, upper = 0; @@ -3767,14 +3761,12 @@ bool tipc_sk_filtering(struct sock *sk) if (_sktype && _sktype != sk->sk_type) return false; - if (tsk->published) { - p = list_first_entry_or_null(&tsk->publications, - struct publication, binding_sock); - if (p) { - type = p->type; - lower = p->lower; - upper = p->upper; - } + if (!list_empty(&tsk->publications)) { + struct publication *p = list_first_entry(&tsk->publications, + struct publication, binding_sock); + type = p->type; + lower = p->lower; + upper = p->upper; } if (!tipc_sk_type_connectionless(sk)) { @@ -3847,7 +3839,7 @@ int tipc_sk_dump(struct sock *sk, u16 dqueues, char *buf) size_t sz = (dqueues) ? SK_LMAX : SK_LMIN; struct tipc_sock *tsk; struct publication *p; - bool tsk_connected; + bool tsk_connected, tsk_published; if (!sk) { i += scnprintf(buf, sz, "sk data: (null)\n"); @@ -3868,8 +3860,9 @@ int tipc_sk_dump(struct sock *sk, u16 dqueues, char *buf) i += scnprintf(buf + i, sz - i, " %u", tsk->conn_type); i += scnprintf(buf + i, sz - i, " %u", tsk->conn_instance); } - i += scnprintf(buf + i, sz - i, " | %u", tsk->published); - if (tsk->published) { + tsk_published = !list_empty(&tsk->publications); + i += scnprintf(buf + i, sz - i, " | %u", tsk_published); + if (tsk_published) { p = list_first_entry_or_null(&tsk->publications, struct publication, binding_sock); i += scnprintf(buf + i, sz - i, " %u", (p) ? p->type : 0);
It's supposed to always equal !list_empty(tsk->publications), so just replace it with the latter. I kept the tipc_sk_dump() output unchanged, but perhaps someone who understands how that's used better would like to change it to reflect the simplified structure accurately. Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <lkml@sdf.org> Cc: Tung Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au> Cc: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com> Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org --- I just happened to be looking at the code and noticed that tsk->published could be reduced to a bool. Then I noticed that it could be deleted entirely. It's a separate patch, but someone might want to move probe_unacked to be with the rest of the bools so struct tipc_sock packs better. net/tipc/socket.c | 29 +++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)