diff mbox series

[v2] net: qrtr: send msgs from local of same id as broadcast

Message ID 20200408033249.120608-1-wenhu.wang@vivo.com
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show
Series [v2] net: qrtr: send msgs from local of same id as broadcast | expand

Commit Message

王文虎 April 8, 2020, 3:32 a.m. UTC
From: Wang Wenhu <wenhu.wang@vivo.com>

If the local node id(qrtr_local_nid) is not modified after its
initialization, it equals to the broadcast node id(QRTR_NODE_BCAST).
So the messages from local node should not be taken as broadcast
and keep the process going to send them out anyway.

The definitions are as follow:
static unsigned int qrtr_local_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;

Fixes: commit fdf5fd397566 ("net: qrtr: Broadcast messages only from control port")
Signed-off-by: Wang Wenhu <wenhu.wang@vivo.com>
---
Changlog:
 - For coding style, line up the newline of the if conditional judgement
   with the one exists before.

 net/qrtr/qrtr.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

David Miller April 8, 2020, 7:56 p.m. UTC | #1
From: WANG Wenhu <wenhu.wang@vivo.com>
Date: Tue,  7 Apr 2020 20:32:47 -0700

> -		enqueue_fn = qrtr_bcast_enqueue;
> -		if (addr->sq_port != QRTR_PORT_CTRL) {
> +		if (addr->sq_port != QRTR_PORT_CTRL &&
> +			qrtr_local_nid != QRTR_NODE_BCAST) {

This is still not correct, it should be:

		if (addr->sq_port != QRTR_PORT_CTRL &&
		    qrtr_local_nid != QRTR_NODE_BCAST) {
Bjorn Andersson April 9, 2020, 7:36 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue 07 Apr 20:32 PDT 2020, WANG Wenhu wrote:

> From: Wang Wenhu <wenhu.wang@vivo.com>
> 
> If the local node id(qrtr_local_nid) is not modified after its
> initialization, it equals to the broadcast node id(QRTR_NODE_BCAST).
> So the messages from local node should not be taken as broadcast
> and keep the process going to send them out anyway.
> 
> The definitions are as follow:
> static unsigned int qrtr_local_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> 
> Fixes: commit fdf5fd397566 ("net: qrtr: Broadcast messages only from control port")
> Signed-off-by: Wang Wenhu <wenhu.wang@vivo.com>
> ---
> Changlog:
>  - For coding style, line up the newline of the if conditional judgement
>    with the one exists before.
> 
>  net/qrtr/qrtr.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/qrtr/qrtr.c b/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
> index 5a8e42ad1504..545a61f8ef75 100644
> --- a/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
> +++ b/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
> @@ -907,20 +907,21 @@ static int qrtr_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
>  
>  	node = NULL;
>  	if (addr->sq_node == QRTR_NODE_BCAST) {
> -		enqueue_fn = qrtr_bcast_enqueue;
> -		if (addr->sq_port != QRTR_PORT_CTRL) {
> +		if (addr->sq_port != QRTR_PORT_CTRL &&
> +			qrtr_local_nid != QRTR_NODE_BCAST) {

So this would mean that if local_nid is configured to be the bcast
address then rather than rejecting messages to non-control ports we will
broadcast them.

What happens when some other node in the network replies? Wouldn't it be
better to explicitly prohibit usage of the bcast address as our node
address?


That said, in torvalds/master qrtr_local_nid is no longer initialized to
QRTR_NODE_BCAST, but 1. So I don't think you need this patch anymore.

Regards,
Bjorn

>  			release_sock(sk);
>  			return -ENOTCONN;
>  		}
> +		enqueue_fn = qrtr_bcast_enqueue;
>  	} else if (addr->sq_node == ipc->us.sq_node) {
>  		enqueue_fn = qrtr_local_enqueue;
>  	} else {
> -		enqueue_fn = qrtr_node_enqueue;
>  		node = qrtr_node_lookup(addr->sq_node);
>  		if (!node) {
>  			release_sock(sk);
>  			return -ECONNRESET;
>  		}
> +		enqueue_fn = qrtr_node_enqueue;
>  	}
>  
>  	plen = (len + 3) & ~3;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>
王文虎 April 14, 2020, 5:14 a.m. UTC | #3
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Date: 2020-04-10 03:36:00
To:  WANG Wenhu <wenhu.wang@vivo.com>
Cc:  "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,Carl Huang <cjhuang@codeaurora.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,netdev@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,kernel@vivo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: qrtr: send msgs from local of same id as broadcast>On Tue 07 Apr 20:32 PDT 2020, WANG Wenhu wrote:
>
>> From: Wang Wenhu <wenhu.wang@vivo.com>
>> 
>> If the local node id(qrtr_local_nid) is not modified after its
>> initialization, it equals to the broadcast node id(QRTR_NODE_BCAST).
>> So the messages from local node should not be taken as broadcast
>> and keep the process going to send them out anyway.
>> 
>> The definitions are as follow:
>> static unsigned int qrtr_local_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> 
>> Fixes: commit fdf5fd397566 ("net: qrtr: Broadcast messages only from control port")
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Wenhu <wenhu.wang@vivo.com>
>> ---
>> Changlog:
>>  - For coding style, line up the newline of the if conditional judgement
>>    with the one exists before.
>> 
>>  net/qrtr/qrtr.c | 7 ++++---
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/qrtr/qrtr.c b/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
>> index 5a8e42ad1504..545a61f8ef75 100644
>> --- a/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
>> +++ b/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
>> @@ -907,20 +907,21 @@ static int qrtr_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
>>  
>>  	node = NULL;
>>  	if (addr->sq_node == QRTR_NODE_BCAST) {
>> -		enqueue_fn = qrtr_bcast_enqueue;
>> -		if (addr->sq_port != QRTR_PORT_CTRL) {
>> +		if (addr->sq_port != QRTR_PORT_CTRL &&
>> +			qrtr_local_nid != QRTR_NODE_BCAST) {
>
>So this would mean that if local_nid is configured to be the bcast
>address then rather than rejecting messages to non-control ports we will
>broadcast them.
>
>What happens when some other node in the network replies? Wouldn't it be
>better to explicitly prohibit usage of the bcast address as our node
>address?

>>
>That said, in torvalds/master qrtr_local_nid is no longer initialized to
>QRTR_NODE_BCAST, but 1. So I don't think you need this patch anymore.
>
>Regards,
>Bjorn

>

Hi Bjorn,
You are right. I see the patch that modified the nid to 1 in mainline v5.7-rc1,
and it is better to solve all the problems. As for this patch, the situation is that
I want to use qrtr in kernel to do something else(to develop another driver I name
it RPMON: Remote Processor Monitor), but the ns or service-route functionality
had been missing, so I write another file qsr.c as you had commetted which
did the same thing with ns.c.

The bad thing was I missed the patch from Manivannan.
So, anyway, this patch is not needed anymore.

Thanks,
Wenhu

>>  			release_sock(sk);
>>  			return -ENOTCONN;
>>  		}
>> +		enqueue_fn = qrtr_bcast_enqueue;
>>  	} else if (addr->sq_node == ipc->us.sq_node) {
>>  		enqueue_fn = qrtr_local_enqueue;
>>  	} else {
>> -		enqueue_fn = qrtr_node_enqueue;
>>  		node = qrtr_node_lookup(addr->sq_node);
>>  		if (!node) {
>>  			release_sock(sk);
>>  			return -ECONNRESET;
>>  		}
>> +		enqueue_fn = qrtr_node_enqueue;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	plen = (len + 3) & ~3;
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/qrtr/qrtr.c b/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
index 5a8e42ad1504..545a61f8ef75 100644
--- a/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
+++ b/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
@@ -907,20 +907,21 @@  static int qrtr_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
 
 	node = NULL;
 	if (addr->sq_node == QRTR_NODE_BCAST) {
-		enqueue_fn = qrtr_bcast_enqueue;
-		if (addr->sq_port != QRTR_PORT_CTRL) {
+		if (addr->sq_port != QRTR_PORT_CTRL &&
+			qrtr_local_nid != QRTR_NODE_BCAST) {
 			release_sock(sk);
 			return -ENOTCONN;
 		}
+		enqueue_fn = qrtr_bcast_enqueue;
 	} else if (addr->sq_node == ipc->us.sq_node) {
 		enqueue_fn = qrtr_local_enqueue;
 	} else {
-		enqueue_fn = qrtr_node_enqueue;
 		node = qrtr_node_lookup(addr->sq_node);
 		if (!node) {
 			release_sock(sk);
 			return -ECONNRESET;
 		}
+		enqueue_fn = qrtr_node_enqueue;
 	}
 
 	plen = (len + 3) & ~3;