Message ID | 20200306182419.13945-1-vgupta@synopsys.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | glibc port to ARC processors | expand |
Please give details of what the entries would be for <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList> and <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/PortStatus> for this port that you intend to add once the port is in.
On 3/6/20 4:21 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > Please give details of what the entries would be for > <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList> and ARC * 32-bit, hard-float, LE: /lib/ld-linux-arc.so.2 * 32-bit, soft-float, LE: /lib/ld-linux-arc.so.2 (soft-float ABI is compatible with hardware-float builds in terms of calling convention, register-file etc) > <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/PortStatus> for this port that you > intend to add once the port is in. Last time I checked, static-pie doesn't work for ARC either ATM. There's nothing else ARC specific, which needs calling out there.
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 3/6/20 4:21 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > Please give details of what the entries would be for > > <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList> and > > ARC > * 32-bit, hard-float, LE: /lib/ld-linux-arc.so.2 > * 32-bit, soft-float, LE: /lib/ld-linux-arc.so.2 > > (soft-float ABI is compatible with hardware-float builds in terms of calling > convention, register-file etc) So that should actually be one bullet-point entry for soft-float ABI, rather than two entries, because it's a single ABI, with a clarifying note following like those for some other architectures.
Hi Joseph, On 3/6/20 5:10 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Sat, 7 Mar 2020, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >> On 3/6/20 4:21 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: >>> Please give details of what the entries would be for >>> <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList> and >> ARC >> * 32-bit, hard-float, LE: /lib/ld-linux-arc.so.2 >> * 32-bit, soft-float, LE: /lib/ld-linux-arc.so.2 >> >> (soft-float ABI is compatible with hardware-float builds in terms of calling >> convention, register-file etc) > So that should actually be one bullet-point entry for soft-float ABI, > rather than two entries, because it's a single ABI, with a clarifying note > following like those for some other architectures. Are you waiting for me to fold the 64-bit time stuff and a respin for a more in depth review of the patchset. I appreciate you have a zillion other things backed up on your todo list :-) Let me know how to proceed. Thx, -Vineet
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > On 3/6/20 5:10 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Mar 2020, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > > >> On 3/6/20 4:21 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > >>> Please give details of what the entries would be for > >>> <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList> and > >> ARC > >> * 32-bit, hard-float, LE: /lib/ld-linux-arc.so.2 > >> * 32-bit, soft-float, LE: /lib/ld-linux-arc.so.2 > >> > >> (soft-float ABI is compatible with hardware-float builds in terms of calling > >> convention, register-file etc) > > So that should actually be one bullet-point entry for soft-float ABI, > > rather than two entries, because it's a single ABI, with a clarifying note > > following like those for some other architectures. > > Are you waiting for me to fold the 64-bit time stuff and a respin for a > more in depth review of the patchset. I appreciate you have a zillion > other things backed up on your todo list :-) The patch series definitely needs revision for the issues I mentioned, yes.
Hi Joseph, On 3/12/20 2:46 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: >> Are you waiting for me to fold the 64-bit time stuff and a respin for a >> more in depth review of the patchset. I appreciate you have a zillion >> other things backed up on your todo list :-) > > The patch series definitely needs revision for the issues I mentioned, > yes. I've addressed all the review comments on v3 and posted a v4 [1]. Can you please take a look when you get chance. Thx, -Vineet [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/2020-March/007127.html