diff mbox series

[bpf,1/2] flow_dissector: Fix to use new variables for port ranges in bpf hook

Message ID 20200116085133.392205-2-komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series Fix the classification based on port ranges in bpf hook | expand

Commit Message

Yoshiki Komachi Jan. 16, 2020, 8:51 a.m. UTC
This patch applies new flag (FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE) and
field (tp_range) to BPF flow dissector to generate appropriate flow
keys when classified by specified port ranges.

Fixes: 8ffb055beae5 ("cls_flower: Fix the behavior using port ranges with hw-offload")
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/flow_dissector.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Petar Penkov Jan. 16, 2020, 5:45 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:13 AM Yoshiki Komachi
<komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This patch applies new flag (FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE) and
> field (tp_range) to BPF flow dissector to generate appropriate flow
> keys when classified by specified port ranges.
>
> Fixes: 8ffb055beae5 ("cls_flower: Fix the behavior using port ranges with hw-offload")
> Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/core/flow_dissector.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> index 2dbbb03..06bbcc3 100644
> --- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> +++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> @@ -876,10 +876,17 @@ static void __skb_flow_bpf_to_target(const struct bpf_flow_keys *flow_keys,
>                 key_control->addr_type = FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_IPV6_ADDRS;
>         }
>
> -       if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS)) {
> +       if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS))
>                 key_ports = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
>                                                       FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS,
>                                                       target_container);
> +       else if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
> +                                   FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE))
> +               key_ports = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
> +                                                     FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE,
> +                                                     target_container);
> +
> +       if (key_ports) {

If the flow dissector uses neither FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE, nor
FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS, I believe key_ports would be used
uninitialized here. We should probably explicitly set it to NULL at
the top of this function.

>                 key_ports->src = flow_keys->sport;
>                 key_ports->dst = flow_keys->dport;
>         }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Yoshiki Komachi Jan. 17, 2020, 1:50 a.m. UTC | #2
2020年1月17日(金) 2:45 Petar Penkov <ppenkov.kernel@gmail.com>:
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:13 AM Yoshiki Komachi
> <komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch applies new flag (FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE) and
> > field (tp_range) to BPF flow dissector to generate appropriate flow
> > keys when classified by specified port ranges.
> >
> > Fixes: 8ffb055beae5 ("cls_flower: Fix the behavior using port ranges with hw-offload")
> > Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  net/core/flow_dissector.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> > index 2dbbb03..06bbcc3 100644
> > --- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> > +++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> > @@ -876,10 +876,17 @@ static void __skb_flow_bpf_to_target(const struct bpf_flow_keys *flow_keys,
> >                 key_control->addr_type = FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_IPV6_ADDRS;
> >         }
> >
> > -       if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS)) {
> > +       if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS))
> >                 key_ports = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
> >                                                       FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS,
> >                                                       target_container);
> > +       else if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
> > +                                   FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE))
> > +               key_ports = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
> > +                                                     FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE,
> > +                                                     target_container);
> > +
> > +       if (key_ports) {
>
> If the flow dissector uses neither FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE, nor
> FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS, I believe key_ports would be used
> uninitialized here. We should probably explicitly set it to NULL at
> the top of this function.

Thank you for kind comments.
I will fix it, and submit the next version later.

Best regards,

--
Yoshiki Komachi

> >                 key_ports->src = flow_keys->sport;
> >                 key_ports->dst = flow_keys->dport;
> >         }
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
index 2dbbb03..06bbcc3 100644
--- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
+++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
@@ -876,10 +876,17 @@  static void __skb_flow_bpf_to_target(const struct bpf_flow_keys *flow_keys,
 		key_control->addr_type = FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_IPV6_ADDRS;
 	}
 
-	if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS)) {
+	if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS))
 		key_ports = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
 						      FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS,
 						      target_container);
+	else if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
+				    FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE))
+		key_ports = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
+						      FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE,
+						      target_container);
+
+	if (key_ports) {
 		key_ports->src = flow_keys->sport;
 		key_ports->dst = flow_keys->dport;
 	}