[v2,1/1] dt-bindings: reset: Fix typo in imx8mq resets

Some of the mipi dsi resets were called

  IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS__

instead of

  IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI__

Since they're DSI related this looks like a typo. This fixes the
only in tree user as well to not break bisecting.

Signed-off-by: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
---
 drivers/reset/reset-imx7.c               | 12 ++++++------
 include/dt-bindings/reset/imx8mq-reset.h |  6 +++---
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Am Donnerstag, den 01.08.2019, 10:20 +0200 schrieb Guido Günther:
> Some of the mipi dsi resets were called
> 
>   IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS__
> 
> instead of
> 
>   IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI__
> 
> Since they're DSI related this looks like a typo. This fixes the
> only in tree user as well to not break bisecting.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>

Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>

> ---
>  drivers/reset/reset-imx7.c               | 12 ++++++------
>  include/dt-bindings/reset/imx8mq-reset.h |  6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-imx7.c b/drivers/reset/reset-imx7.c
> index 3ecd770f910b..1443a55a0c29 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-imx7.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-imx7.c
> @@ -169,9 +169,9 @@ static const struct imx7_src_signal imx8mq_src_signals[IMX8MQ_RESET_NUM] = {
> > >  	[IMX8MQ_RESET_OTG2_PHY_RESET]		= { SRC_USBOPHY2_RCR, BIT(0) },
> > >  	[IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_RESET_BYTE_N]	= { SRC_MIPIPHY_RCR, BIT(1) },
> > >  	[IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_RESET_N]		= { SRC_MIPIPHY_RCR, BIT(2) },
> > > -	[IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS_DPI_RESET_N]	= { SRC_MIPIPHY_RCR, BIT(3) },
> > > -	[IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS_ESC_RESET_N]	= { SRC_MIPIPHY_RCR, BIT(4) },
> > > -	[IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS_PCLK_RESET_N]	= { SRC_MIPIPHY_RCR, BIT(5) },
> > > +	[IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_DPI_RESET_N]	= { SRC_MIPIPHY_RCR, BIT(3) },
> > > +	[IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_ESC_RESET_N]	= { SRC_MIPIPHY_RCR, BIT(4) },
> > > +	[IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_PCLK_RESET_N]	= { SRC_MIPIPHY_RCR, BIT(5) },
> > >  	[IMX8MQ_RESET_PCIEPHY]			= { SRC_PCIEPHY_RCR,
> >  						    BIT(2) | BIT(1) },
> > >  	[IMX8MQ_RESET_PCIEPHY_PERST]		= { SRC_PCIEPHY_RCR, BIT(3) },
> @@ -220,9 +220,9 @@ static int imx8mq_reset_set(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>  
> >  	case IMX8MQ_RESET_PCIE_CTRL_APPS_EN:
> > >  	case IMX8MQ_RESET_PCIE2_CTRL_APPS_EN:	/* fallthrough */
> > > -	case IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS_PCLK_RESET_N:	/* fallthrough */
> > > -	case IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS_ESC_RESET_N:	/* fallthrough */
> > > -	case IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS_DPI_RESET_N:	/* fallthrough */
> > > +	case IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_PCLK_RESET_N:	/* fallthrough */
> > > +	case IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_ESC_RESET_N:	/* fallthrough */
> > > +	case IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_DPI_RESET_N:	/* fallthrough */
> > >  	case IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_RESET_N:	/* fallthrough */
> > >  	case IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_RESET_BYTE_N:	/* fallthrough */
> >  		value = assert ? 0 : bit;
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset/imx8mq-reset.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset/imx8mq-reset.h
> index 57c592498aa0..bfa41b0e24f6 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/reset/imx8mq-reset.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset/imx8mq-reset.h
> @@ -31,9 +31,9 @@
> >  #define IMX8MQ_RESET_OTG2_PHY_RESET		20
> >  #define IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_RESET_BYTE_N	21
> >  #define IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_RESET_N		22
> > -#define IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS_DPI_RESET_N	23
> > -#define IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS_ESC_RESET_N	24
> > -#define IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS_PCLK_RESET_N	25
> > +#define IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_DPI_RESET_N	23
> > +#define IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_ESC_RESET_N	24
> > +#define IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI_PCLK_RESET_N	25
> >  #define IMX8MQ_RESET_PCIEPHY			26
> >  #define IMX8MQ_RESET_PCIEPHY_PERST		27
> >  #define IMX8MQ_RESET_PCIE_CTRL_APPS_EN		28

On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 10:20 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> Some of the mipi dsi resets were called
> 
>   IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DIS__
> 
> instead of
> 
>   IMX8MQ_RESET_MIPI_DSI__
> 
> Since they're DSI related this looks like a typo. This fixes the
> only in tree user as well to not break bisecting.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>

Thank you, this was a typo in the Rev.0 reference manual.
It has been fixed in Rev. 1.

Applied to reset/next with Lucas' R-b.

regards
Philipp