| Message ID | 20190607231100.5894-1-peron.clem@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Allwinner A64/H6 IR support | expand |
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 01:10:51AM +0200, Clément Péron wrote: > We are using RXINT bits definition when looking at RXSTA register. > > These bits are equal but it's not really proper. > > Introduce the RXSTA bits and use them to have coherency. > > Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
Hi Sean, You acked the whole v3 series but this patch has been introduced in v5 could you ack this one too? Thanks, Clément On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 11:52, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 01:10:51AM +0200, Clément Péron wrote: > > We are using RXINT bits definition when looking at RXSTA register. > > > > These bits are equal but it's not really proper. > > > > Introduce the RXSTA bits and use them to have coherency. > > > > Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com> > > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> > > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 04:32:22PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote: > Hi Sean, > > You acked the whole v3 series but this patch has been introduced in v5 > could you ack this one too? Acked-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org> Thanks Sean > > Thanks, > Clément > > > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 11:52, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 01:10:51AM +0200, Clément Péron wrote: > > > We are using RXINT bits definition when looking at RXSTA register. > > > > > > These bits are equal but it's not really proper. > > > > > > Introduce the RXSTA bits and use them to have coherency. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com> > > > > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> > > > > Maxime > > > > -- > > Maxime Ripard, Bootlin > > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > > https://bootlin.com
Hi, This series received ack from device-tree, media and sunxi maintainers. Can patch 2/3/4 goes to linux-media and the rest to linux-sunxi ? Thanks, Clément On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 at 01:11, Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > A64 IR support series[1] pointed out that an A31 bindings should be > introduced. > > This series introduce the A31 compatible bindings, then switch it on > the already existing board. > > Finally introduce A64 and H6 support. > > I have reenable the other H6 boards IR support as Ondrej solve the issue. > > Regards, > Clément > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1031390/#1221464 > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/27/321 > [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10975563/ > > Changes since v4: > - Reuse defines for RXSTA bits definition > > Changes since v3: > - Reenable IR for other H6 boards > - Add RXSTA bits definition > - Add Sean Young's "Acked-by" tags > > Changes since v2: > - Disable IR for other H6 boards > - Split DTS patch for H3/H5 > - Introduce IR quirks > > Clément Péron (11): > dt-bindings: media: sunxi-ir: Add A31 compatible > media: rc: Introduce sunxi_ir_quirks > media: rc: sunxi: Add A31 compatible > media: rc: sunxi: Add RXSTA bits definition > ARM: dts: sunxi: Prefer A31 bindings for IR > ARM: dts: sunxi: Prefer A31 bindings for IR > dt-bindings: media: sunxi-ir: Add A64 compatible > dt-bindings: media: sunxi-ir: Add H6 compatible > arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add IR receiver node > arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Enable IR on H6 boards > arm64: defconfig: Enable IR SUNXI option > > Igors Makejevs (1): > arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add IR node > > Jernej Skrabec (1): > arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Enable IR on Orange Pi Win > > .../devicetree/bindings/media/sunxi-ir.txt | 11 ++- > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi | 2 +- > .../dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-orangepi-win.dts | 4 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 18 ++++ > .../dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-beelink-gs1.dts | 4 + > .../dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-orangepi.dtsi | 4 + > .../boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts | 4 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi | 19 ++++ > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + > drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c | 88 ++++++++++++++----- > 13 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1 >
Hi, On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:12:45PM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 04:32:22PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote: > > Hi Sean, > > > > You acked the whole v3 series but this patch has been introduced in v5 > > could you ack this one too? > > Acked-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org> So who's tree should this series go through? It seems mostly device tree. Alternatively I'm happy to try it get merged via the media tree. Thanks Sean
Hi Sean, On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:25:57AM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:12:45PM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 04:32:22PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote: > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > > You acked the whole v3 series but this patch has been introduced in v5 > > > could you ack this one too? > > > > Acked-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org> > > So who's tree should this series go through? It seems mostly device tree. > Alternatively I'm happy to try it get merged via the media tree. Ideally the media bits should go through the media tree, the DT bits will go through arm-soc So you can apply the patches 1-4, 7 and 10, I'll apply the rest. Does that work for you? Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:04:40AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Sean, > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:25:57AM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:12:45PM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 04:32:22PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote: > > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > > > > You acked the whole v3 series but this patch has been introduced in v5 > > > > could you ack this one too? > > > > > > Acked-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org> > > > > So who's tree should this series go through? It seems mostly device tree. > > Alternatively I'm happy to try it get merged via the media tree. > > Ideally the media bits should go through the media tree, the DT bits > will go through arm-soc > > So you can apply the patches 1-4, 7 and 10, I'll apply the rest. > > Does that work for you? Works for me, I'll add them to my next pull request to Mauro. Thanks, Sean
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:39:37AM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:04:40AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Sean, > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:25:57AM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:12:45PM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 04:32:22PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote: > > > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > > > > > > You acked the whole v3 series but this patch has been introduced in v5 > > > > > could you ack this one too? > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org> > > > > > > So who's tree should this series go through? It seems mostly device tree. > > > Alternatively I'm happy to try it get merged via the media tree. > > > > Ideally the media bits should go through the media tree, the DT bits > > will go through arm-soc > > > > So you can apply the patches 1-4, 7 and 10, I'll apply the rest. > > > > Does that work for you? > > Works for me, I'll add them to my next pull request to Mauro. Applied 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11 to 13. Thanks! Maxmie -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com