mbox series

[0/5] Taprio qdisc fixes

Message ID 20190420000052.4242-1-andre.guedes@intel.com
Headers show
Series Taprio qdisc fixes | expand

Message

Andre Guedes April 20, 2019, midnight UTC 
Hi all,

This series contains some minor improvements (patches 1 and 2) and fixes
(patches 3-5) to taprio qdisc.

Best regards,

Andre

Andre Guedes (5):
  net: sched: taprio: Remove pointless variable assigment
  net: sched: taprio: Refactor taprio_get_start_time()
  net: sched: taprio: Fix null pointer deref bug
  net: sched: taprio: Fix taprio_peek()
  net: sched: taprio: Fix taprio_dequeue()

 net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Comments

David Miller April 21, 2019, 3:46 a.m. UTC | #1 
From: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:00:47 -0700

> This series contains some minor improvements (patches 1 and 2) and
> fixes (patches 3-5) to taprio qdisc.

This series does not apply cleanly at all to the net tree.
Andre Guedes April 22, 2019, 7:18 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi David,

> On Apr 20, 2019, at 8:46 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> 
> From: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:00:47 -0700
> 
>> This series contains some minor improvements (patches 1 and 2) and
>> fixes (patches 3-5) to taprio qdisc.
> 
> This series does not apply cleanly at all to the net tree.

This series in based on top of net-next tree. I just realized I missed adding the “net-next” prefix to the subject.

Do you want me to re-send it with the “net-next” prefix?

Thanks,

Andre
David Miller April 23, 2019, 4:21 a.m. UTC | #3 
From: "Guedes, Andre" <andre.guedes@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:18:26 +0000

>> On Apr 20, 2019, at 8:46 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> 
>> From: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
>> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:00:47 -0700
>> 
>>> This series contains some minor improvements (patches 1 and 2) and
>>> fixes (patches 3-5) to taprio qdisc.
>> 
>> This series does not apply cleanly at all to the net tree.
> 
> This series in based on top of net-next tree. I just realized I missed adding the “net-next” prefix to the subject.
> 
> Do you want me to re-send it with the “net-next” prefix?

Yes, please.