diff mbox series

[bpf-next,4/5] btf: fix bug with resolving STRUCT/UNION into corresponding FWD

Message ID 20190227224642.1069138-5-andriin@fb.com
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series btf_dedup algorithm and test fixes | expand

Commit Message

Andrii Nakryiko Feb. 27, 2019, 10:46 p.m. UTC
When checking available canonical candidates for struct/union algorithm
utilizes btf_dedup_is_equiv to determine if candidate is suitable. This
check is not enough when candidate is corresponding FWD for that
struct/union, because according to equivalence logic they are
equivalent. When it so happens that FWD and STRUCT/UNION end in hashing
to the same bucket, it's possible to create remapping loop from FWD to
STRUCT and STRUCT to same FWD, which will cause btf_dedup() to loop
forever.

This patch fixes the issue by additionally checking that type and
canonical candidate are strictly equal (utilizing btf_equal_struct).

Fixes: d5caef5b5655 ("btf: add BTF types deduplication algorithm")
Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Yonghong Song Feb. 28, 2019, 6:18 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2/27/19 2:46 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> When checking available canonical candidates for struct/union algorithm
> utilizes btf_dedup_is_equiv to determine if candidate is suitable. This
> check is not enough when candidate is corresponding FWD for that
> struct/union, because according to equivalence logic they are
> equivalent. When it so happens that FWD and STRUCT/UNION end in hashing
> to the same bucket, it's possible to create remapping loop from FWD to
> STRUCT and STRUCT to same FWD, which will cause btf_dedup() to loop
> forever.
> 
> This patch fixes the issue by additionally checking that type and
> canonical candidate are strictly equal (utilizing btf_equal_struct).

It looks like btf_equal_struct() checking equality except
member type id's. Maybe calling it btf_almost_equal_struct() or 
something like that?

> 
> Fixes: d5caef5b5655 ("btf: add BTF types deduplication algorithm")
> Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
> ---
>   tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 6 +++++-
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> index 6bbb710216e6..53db26d158c9 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static void btf_dedup_merge_hypot_map(struct btf_dedup *d)
>   static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
>   {
>   	struct btf_dedup_node *cand_node;
> -	struct btf_type *t;
> +	struct btf_type *cand_type, *t;
>   	/* if we don't find equivalent type, then we are canonical */
>   	__u32 new_id = type_id;
>   	__u16 kind;
> @@ -2275,6 +2275,10 @@ static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
>   	for_each_dedup_cand(d, h, cand_node) {
>   		int eq;
>   
> +		cand_type = d->btf->types[cand_node->type_id];
> +		if (!btf_equal_struct(t, cand_type))

The comment for this btf_equal_struct is not quite right.
/*
  * Check structural compatibility of two FUNC_PROTOs, ignoring 
referenced type
  * IDs. This check is performed during type graph equivalence check and
  * referenced types equivalence is checked separately.
  */
static bool btf_equal_struct(struct btf_type *t1, struct btf_type *t2)

It should be two "struct/union types".

> +			continue;
> +

I did not trace the algorithm how infinite loop happens. But the above
change is certainly a correct one, you want to do deduplication only 
after everything else (except member types) are euqal?

If the bug is due to circle in struct->fwd and fwd->struct mappings,
maybe a simple check whether such circle exists or not before update
the mapping will also work? I am not proposing this fix, but want
to understand better the issue.




>   		btf_dedup_clear_hypot_map(d);
>   		eq = btf_dedup_is_equiv(d, type_id, cand_node->type_id);
>   		if (eq < 0)
>
Song Liu Feb. 28, 2019, 6:29 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:48 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> wrote:
>
> When checking available canonical candidates for struct/union algorithm
> utilizes btf_dedup_is_equiv to determine if candidate is suitable. This
> check is not enough when candidate is corresponding FWD for that
> struct/union, because according to equivalence logic they are
> equivalent. When it so happens that FWD and STRUCT/UNION end in hashing
> to the same bucket, it's possible to create remapping loop from FWD to
> STRUCT and STRUCT to same FWD, which will cause btf_dedup() to loop
> forever.
>
> This patch fixes the issue by additionally checking that type and
> canonical candidate are strictly equal (utilizing btf_equal_struct).
>
> Fixes: d5caef5b5655 ("btf: add BTF types deduplication algorithm")
> Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>

> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> index 6bbb710216e6..53db26d158c9 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static void btf_dedup_merge_hypot_map(struct btf_dedup *d)
>  static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
>  {
>         struct btf_dedup_node *cand_node;
> -       struct btf_type *t;
> +       struct btf_type *cand_type, *t;
>         /* if we don't find equivalent type, then we are canonical */
>         __u32 new_id = type_id;
>         __u16 kind;
> @@ -2275,6 +2275,10 @@ static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
>         for_each_dedup_cand(d, h, cand_node) {
>                 int eq;
>
> +               cand_type = d->btf->types[cand_node->type_id];
> +               if (!btf_equal_struct(t, cand_type))
> +                       continue;
> +
>                 btf_dedup_clear_hypot_map(d);
>                 eq = btf_dedup_is_equiv(d, type_id, cand_node->type_id);
>                 if (eq < 0)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Andrii Nakryiko Feb. 28, 2019, 7:07 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:19 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/27/19 2:46 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > When checking available canonical candidates for struct/union algorithm
> > utilizes btf_dedup_is_equiv to determine if candidate is suitable. This
> > check is not enough when candidate is corresponding FWD for that
> > struct/union, because according to equivalence logic they are
> > equivalent. When it so happens that FWD and STRUCT/UNION end in hashing
> > to the same bucket, it's possible to create remapping loop from FWD to
> > STRUCT and STRUCT to same FWD, which will cause btf_dedup() to loop
> > forever.
> >
> > This patch fixes the issue by additionally checking that type and
> > canonical candidate are strictly equal (utilizing btf_equal_struct).
>
> It looks like btf_equal_struct() checking equality except
> member type id's. Maybe calling it btf_almost_equal_struct() or
> something like that?

Yes, for struct/union we can't compare types directly, that's what
btf_dedup_is_equiv is doing. I think btf_equal_struct w/ comment
explaining this particular behavior is good enough. If you insist,
though, I'd rather go to something like btf_shallow_equal_struct or
something along those lines.

>
> >
> > Fixes: d5caef5b5655 ("btf: add BTF types deduplication algorithm")
> > Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
> > ---
> >   tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 6 +++++-
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > index 6bbb710216e6..53db26d158c9 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static void btf_dedup_merge_hypot_map(struct btf_dedup *d)
> >   static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
> >   {
> >       struct btf_dedup_node *cand_node;
> > -     struct btf_type *t;
> > +     struct btf_type *cand_type, *t;
> >       /* if we don't find equivalent type, then we are canonical */
> >       __u32 new_id = type_id;
> >       __u16 kind;
> > @@ -2275,6 +2275,10 @@ static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
> >       for_each_dedup_cand(d, h, cand_node) {
> >               int eq;
> >
> > +             cand_type = d->btf->types[cand_node->type_id];
> > +             if (!btf_equal_struct(t, cand_type))
>
> The comment for this btf_equal_struct is not quite right.
> /*
>   * Check structural compatibility of two FUNC_PROTOs, ignoring
> referenced type
>   * IDs. This check is performed during type graph equivalence check and
>   * referenced types equivalence is checked separately.
>   */
> static bool btf_equal_struct(struct btf_type *t1, struct btf_type *t2)
>
> It should be two "struct/union types".

Yep, good catch, will fix!

>
> > +                     continue;
> > +
>
> I did not trace the algorithm how infinite loop happens. But the above

Check the test in follow up patch. It has a minimal example that
triggers this bug. It happens when we have some FWD x, which we
discover that it should be resolved to some STRUCT x (as a result of
equivalence check/resolution of some other struct s, that references
struct x internally). But that struct x might not have been
deduplicated yet, we just record this FWD -> STRUCT mapping so that we
don't lose this connection. Later, once we get to deduplication of
struct x, FWD x will be (in case of hash collision) one possible
candidate to consider for deduplication. At that point,
btf_dedup_is_equiv will consider them equivalent (but they are not
equal (!), that's where the bug is), so we'll try to resolve STRUCT x
-> FWD x, which creates a loop.

In btf_dedup_merge_hypot_map() that is used to record discovered
"equivalences" during struct/union type graph equivalence check, we
have explicit check to never resolve STRUCT/UNION into equivalent FWD,
so such loop shouldn't happen, except I missed the case of having FWD
as a possible dedup candidate due to hash collision.

> change is certainly a correct one, you want to do deduplication only
> after everything else (except member types) are euqal?

Well, if not for special case of FWD == STRUCT/UNION when
deduplicating structs, btf_dedup_is_equiv would be enough, because it
already checks for btf_equal_struct internally, when both types are
struct/union. It's just the special bit at the beginning of is_equiv
check that allows FWD and STRUCT/UNION with the same name to be
declared equivalent, that throws this off.

>
> If the bug is due to circle in struct->fwd and fwd->struct mappings,
> maybe a simple check whether such circle exists or not before update
> the mapping will also work? I am not proposing this fix, but want
> to understand better the issue.

That's essentially what we use btf_equal_struct for here, really. We
could equivalently just check BTF_INFO_KIND(t) == BTF_INFO_KIND(cand)
explicitly, but I btf_equal_struct feels a bit more generic and
obviously correct.

>
>
>
>
> >               btf_dedup_clear_hypot_map(d);
> >               eq = btf_dedup_is_equiv(d, type_id, cand_node->type_id);
> >               if (eq < 0)
> >
Yonghong Song Feb. 28, 2019, 7:41 p.m. UTC | #4
On 2/28/19 11:07 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:19 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/19 2:46 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>>> When checking available canonical candidates for struct/union algorithm
>>> utilizes btf_dedup_is_equiv to determine if candidate is suitable. This
>>> check is not enough when candidate is corresponding FWD for that
>>> struct/union, because according to equivalence logic they are
>>> equivalent. When it so happens that FWD and STRUCT/UNION end in hashing
>>> to the same bucket, it's possible to create remapping loop from FWD to
>>> STRUCT and STRUCT to same FWD, which will cause btf_dedup() to loop
>>> forever.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the issue by additionally checking that type and
>>> canonical candidate are strictly equal (utilizing btf_equal_struct).
>>
>> It looks like btf_equal_struct() checking equality except
>> member type id's. Maybe calling it btf_almost_equal_struct() or
>> something like that?
> 
> Yes, for struct/union we can't compare types directly, that's what
> btf_dedup_is_equiv is doing. I think btf_equal_struct w/ comment
> explaining this particular behavior is good enough. If you insist,
> though, I'd rather go to something like btf_shallow_equal_struct or
> something along those lines.

btf_shallow_equal_struct() will be fine.

> 
>>
>>>
>>> Fixes: d5caef5b5655 ("btf: add BTF types deduplication algorithm")
>>> Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
>>> ---
>>>    tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 6 +++++-
>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
>>> index 6bbb710216e6..53db26d158c9 100644
>>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
>>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
>>> @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static void btf_dedup_merge_hypot_map(struct btf_dedup *d)
>>>    static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
>>>    {
>>>        struct btf_dedup_node *cand_node;
>>> -     struct btf_type *t;
>>> +     struct btf_type *cand_type, *t;
>>>        /* if we don't find equivalent type, then we are canonical */
>>>        __u32 new_id = type_id;
>>>        __u16 kind;
>>> @@ -2275,6 +2275,10 @@ static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
>>>        for_each_dedup_cand(d, h, cand_node) {
>>>                int eq;
>>>
>>> +             cand_type = d->btf->types[cand_node->type_id];
>>> +             if (!btf_equal_struct(t, cand_type))
>>
>> The comment for this btf_equal_struct is not quite right.
>> /*
>>    * Check structural compatibility of two FUNC_PROTOs, ignoring
>> referenced type
>>    * IDs. This check is performed during type graph equivalence check and
>>    * referenced types equivalence is checked separately.
>>    */
>> static bool btf_equal_struct(struct btf_type *t1, struct btf_type *t2)
>>
>> It should be two "struct/union types".
> 
> Yep, good catch, will fix!
> 
>>
>>> +                     continue;
>>> +
>>
>> I did not trace the algorithm how infinite loop happens. But the above
> 
> Check the test in follow up patch. It has a minimal example that
> triggers this bug. It happens when we have some FWD x, which we
> discover that it should be resolved to some STRUCT x (as a result of
> equivalence check/resolution of some other struct s, that references
> struct x internally). But that struct x might not have been
> deduplicated yet, we just record this FWD -> STRUCT mapping so that we
> don't lose this connection. Later, once we get to deduplication of
> struct x, FWD x will be (in case of hash collision) one possible
> candidate to consider for deduplication. At that point,
> btf_dedup_is_equiv will consider them equivalent (but they are not
> equal (!), that's where the bug is), so we'll try to resolve STRUCT x
> -> FWD x, which creates a loop.
> 
> In btf_dedup_merge_hypot_map() that is used to record discovered
> "equivalences" during struct/union type graph equivalence check, we
> have explicit check to never resolve STRUCT/UNION into equivalent FWD,
> so such loop shouldn't happen, except I missed the case of having FWD
> as a possible dedup candidate due to hash collision.
> 
>> change is certainly a correct one, you want to do deduplication only
>> after everything else (except member types) are euqal?
> 
> Well, if not for special case of FWD == STRUCT/UNION when
> deduplicating structs, btf_dedup_is_equiv would be enough, because it
> already checks for btf_equal_struct internally, when both types are
> struct/union. It's just the special bit at the beginning of is_equiv
> check that allows FWD and STRUCT/UNION with the same name to be
> declared equivalent, that throws this off.
> 
>>
>> If the bug is due to circle in struct->fwd and fwd->struct mappings,
>> maybe a simple check whether such circle exists or not before update
>> the mapping will also work? I am not proposing this fix, but want
>> to understand better the issue.
> 
> That's essentially what we use btf_equal_struct for here, really. We
> could equivalently just check BTF_INFO_KIND(t) == BTF_INFO_KIND(cand)
> explicitly, but I btf_equal_struct feels a bit more generic and
> obviously correct.

Okay, I see. So the goal is really to prevent processing FWD in the
struct/union dedup candidate list. It will be good to summarize
the above detailed explanation in commit message.

With the above suggested changes,
   Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>

> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>                btf_dedup_clear_hypot_map(d);
>>>                eq = btf_dedup_is_equiv(d, type_id, cand_node->type_id);
>>>                if (eq < 0)
>>>
Andrii Nakryiko Feb. 28, 2019, 8:26 p.m. UTC | #5
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:42 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/28/19 11:07 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:19 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/27/19 2:46 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >>> When checking available canonical candidates for struct/union algorithm
> >>> utilizes btf_dedup_is_equiv to determine if candidate is suitable. This
> >>> check is not enough when candidate is corresponding FWD for that
> >>> struct/union, because according to equivalence logic they are
> >>> equivalent. When it so happens that FWD and STRUCT/UNION end in hashing
> >>> to the same bucket, it's possible to create remapping loop from FWD to
> >>> STRUCT and STRUCT to same FWD, which will cause btf_dedup() to loop
> >>> forever.
> >>>
> >>> This patch fixes the issue by additionally checking that type and
> >>> canonical candidate are strictly equal (utilizing btf_equal_struct).
> >>
> >> It looks like btf_equal_struct() checking equality except
> >> member type id's. Maybe calling it btf_almost_equal_struct() or
> >> something like that?
> >
> > Yes, for struct/union we can't compare types directly, that's what
> > btf_dedup_is_equiv is doing. I think btf_equal_struct w/ comment
> > explaining this particular behavior is good enough. If you insist,
> > though, I'd rather go to something like btf_shallow_equal_struct or
> > something along those lines.
>
> btf_shallow_equal_struct() will be fine.

Ok.

>
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: d5caef5b5655 ("btf: add BTF types deduplication algorithm")
> >>> Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>    tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 6 +++++-
> >>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> >>> index 6bbb710216e6..53db26d158c9 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> >>> @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static void btf_dedup_merge_hypot_map(struct btf_dedup *d)
> >>>    static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
> >>>    {
> >>>        struct btf_dedup_node *cand_node;
> >>> -     struct btf_type *t;
> >>> +     struct btf_type *cand_type, *t;
> >>>        /* if we don't find equivalent type, then we are canonical */
> >>>        __u32 new_id = type_id;
> >>>        __u16 kind;
> >>> @@ -2275,6 +2275,10 @@ static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
> >>>        for_each_dedup_cand(d, h, cand_node) {
> >>>                int eq;
> >>>
> >>> +             cand_type = d->btf->types[cand_node->type_id];
> >>> +             if (!btf_equal_struct(t, cand_type))
> >>
> >> The comment for this btf_equal_struct is not quite right.
> >> /*
> >>    * Check structural compatibility of two FUNC_PROTOs, ignoring
> >> referenced type
> >>    * IDs. This check is performed during type graph equivalence check and
> >>    * referenced types equivalence is checked separately.
> >>    */
> >> static bool btf_equal_struct(struct btf_type *t1, struct btf_type *t2)
> >>
> >> It should be two "struct/union types".
> >
> > Yep, good catch, will fix!
> >
> >>
> >>> +                     continue;
> >>> +
> >>
> >> I did not trace the algorithm how infinite loop happens. But the above
> >
> > Check the test in follow up patch. It has a minimal example that
> > triggers this bug. It happens when we have some FWD x, which we
> > discover that it should be resolved to some STRUCT x (as a result of
> > equivalence check/resolution of some other struct s, that references
> > struct x internally). But that struct x might not have been
> > deduplicated yet, we just record this FWD -> STRUCT mapping so that we
> > don't lose this connection. Later, once we get to deduplication of
> > struct x, FWD x will be (in case of hash collision) one possible
> > candidate to consider for deduplication. At that point,
> > btf_dedup_is_equiv will consider them equivalent (but they are not
> > equal (!), that's where the bug is), so we'll try to resolve STRUCT x
> > -> FWD x, which creates a loop.
> >
> > In btf_dedup_merge_hypot_map() that is used to record discovered
> > "equivalences" during struct/union type graph equivalence check, we
> > have explicit check to never resolve STRUCT/UNION into equivalent FWD,
> > so such loop shouldn't happen, except I missed the case of having FWD
> > as a possible dedup candidate due to hash collision.
> >
> >> change is certainly a correct one, you want to do deduplication only
> >> after everything else (except member types) are euqal?
> >
> > Well, if not for special case of FWD == STRUCT/UNION when
> > deduplicating structs, btf_dedup_is_equiv would be enough, because it
> > already checks for btf_equal_struct internally, when both types are
> > struct/union. It's just the special bit at the beginning of is_equiv
> > check that allows FWD and STRUCT/UNION with the same name to be
> > declared equivalent, that throws this off.
> >
> >>
> >> If the bug is due to circle in struct->fwd and fwd->struct mappings,
> >> maybe a simple check whether such circle exists or not before update
> >> the mapping will also work? I am not proposing this fix, but want
> >> to understand better the issue.
> >
> > That's essentially what we use btf_equal_struct for here, really. We
> > could equivalently just check BTF_INFO_KIND(t) == BTF_INFO_KIND(cand)
> > explicitly, but I btf_equal_struct feels a bit more generic and
> > obviously correct.
>
> Okay, I see. So the goal is really to prevent processing FWD in the
> struct/union dedup candidate list. It will be good to summarize
> the above detailed explanation in commit message.

Ok, will try to do this more succinctly.

>
> With the above suggested changes,
>    Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>                btf_dedup_clear_hypot_map(d);
> >>>                eq = btf_dedup_is_equiv(d, type_id, cand_node->type_id);
> >>>                if (eq < 0)
> >>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
index 6bbb710216e6..53db26d158c9 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
@@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@  static void btf_dedup_merge_hypot_map(struct btf_dedup *d)
 static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
 {
 	struct btf_dedup_node *cand_node;
-	struct btf_type *t;
+	struct btf_type *cand_type, *t;
 	/* if we don't find equivalent type, then we are canonical */
 	__u32 new_id = type_id;
 	__u16 kind;
@@ -2275,6 +2275,10 @@  static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
 	for_each_dedup_cand(d, h, cand_node) {
 		int eq;
 
+		cand_type = d->btf->types[cand_node->type_id];
+		if (!btf_equal_struct(t, cand_type))
+			continue;
+
 		btf_dedup_clear_hypot_map(d);
 		eq = btf_dedup_is_equiv(d, type_id, cand_node->type_id);
 		if (eq < 0)