Message ID | 20190222051405.GA2527@blackberry |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] Please pull my kvm-ppc-next-5.1-1 tag | expand |
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 2:14 PM Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote: > Masahiro Yamada (1): > KVM: PPC: Remove -I. header search paths Michael Ellerman already applied this and I see it in linux-next, though.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 02:23:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 2:14 PM Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote: > > > > > Masahiro Yamada (1): > > KVM: PPC: Remove -I. header search paths > > > Michael Ellerman already applied this > and I see it in linux-next, though. Oh well, I didn't notice that, but it doesn't matter anyway because the powerpc/next branch merges cleanly with my kvm-ppc-next branch (and if it didn't, Stephen Rothwell would have let us know). Paul.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 2:52 PM Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 02:23:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 2:14 PM Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Masahiro Yamada (1): > > > KVM: PPC: Remove -I. header search paths > > > > > > Michael Ellerman already applied this > > and I see it in linux-next, though. > > Oh well, I didn't notice that, but it doesn't matter anyway because > the powerpc/next branch merges cleanly with my kvm-ppc-next branch > (and if it didn't, Stephen Rothwell would have let us know). Yeah, git will merge it nicely, but please let me state my two cents. I like to see "applied" email from a maintainer. Michael replied to me (and ML) when he applied my patch. I noticed you had also picked it up only after I saw your pull request. If you collect patches silently, nobody is given a chance to point out when something not nice happens.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 03:46:33PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 2:52 PM Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 02:23:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 2:14 PM Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Masahiro Yamada (1): > > > > KVM: PPC: Remove -I. header search paths > > > > > > > > > Michael Ellerman already applied this > > > and I see it in linux-next, though. > > > > Oh well, I didn't notice that, but it doesn't matter anyway because > > the powerpc/next branch merges cleanly with my kvm-ppc-next branch > > (and if it didn't, Stephen Rothwell would have let us know). > > > Yeah, git will merge it nicely, but > please let me state my two cents. > > I like to see "applied" email from a maintainer. > > Michael replied to me (and ML) when he applied my patch. I normally do that too, though I do it manually (I think Michael has an automated process), and this time my collecting of patches got delayed because I was chasing a nasty memory corruption bug. I have asked Michael to cc me when he applies a KVM patch to his tree in future. Paul.
On 22/02/19 06:14, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Paolo or Radim, > > Please do a pull from my kvm-ppc-next-5.1-1 tag to get a PPC KVM > update for 5.1. There is nothing major in there, just a collection of > bug fixes and minor improvements. > > Thanks, > Paul. > > The following changes since commit d13937116f1e82bf508a6325111b322c30c85eb9: > > Linux 5.0-rc6 (2019-02-10 14:42:20 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc tags/kvm-ppc-next-5.1-1 > > for you to fetch changes up to 0a0c50f771f577b05f5a1ac9867d296d02a5e51c: > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/powerpc/topic/ppc-kvm' into kvm-ppc-next (2019-02-22 13:52:30 +1100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > PPC KVM update for 5.1 > > There are no major new features this time, just a collection of bug > fixes and improvements in various areas, including machine check > handling and context switching of protection-key-related registers. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Alexey Kardashevskiy (2): > KVM: PPC: Release all hardware TCE tables attached to a group > KVM: PPC: Book3S: Improve KVM reference counting > > Jordan Niethe (1): > KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix build failure without IOMMU support > > Masahiro Yamada (1): > KVM: PPC: Remove -I. header search paths > > Michael Ellerman (2): > KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Context switch AMR on Power9 > powerpc/kvm: Save and restore host AMR/IAMR/UAMOR > > Paul Mackerras (5): > KVM: PPC: Book3S PR: Add emulation for slbfee. instruction > KVM: PPC: Book3S: Allow XICS emulation to work in nested hosts using XIVE > KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Simplify machine check handling > powerpc/64s: Better printing of machine check info for guest MCEs > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/powerpc/topic/ppc-kvm' into kvm-ppc-next > > Suraj Jitindar Singh (2): > KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Optimise mmio emulation for devices on FAST_MMIO_BUS > KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add KVM stat largepages_[2M/1G] > > wangbo (1): > KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Replace kmalloc_node+memset with kzalloc_node > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++ > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 17 +++++++- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/mce.h | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c | 8 ++-- > arch/powerpc/kvm/Makefile | 5 --- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 20 ++++++--- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_32_mmu.c | 1 + > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c | 14 ++++++ > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 18 ++++++++ > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c | 15 ++++++- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c | 8 ++-- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c | 18 ++++++++ > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 47 +++++++++++++------- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_builtin.c | 14 +++--- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_ras.c | 58 ++++++------------------- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c | 7 +++ > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 76 +++++++++++++-------------------- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_rtas.c | 8 ++-- > arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 4 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c | 2 +- > 20 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-) > Pulled, thanks. Paolo