Message ID | 20190205001835.25660-2-philmd@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | OpenBSD: Block layer fixes (was 'Enable qtesting') | expand |
On 2/5/19 1:18 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Since the ahci-test uses qemu-img, add a dependency to build it > before using it. > This fixes: > > $ gmake check-qtest V=1 > QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 QTEST_QEMU_IMG=qemu-img tests/ahci-test > Failed to execute child process "/tmp/qemu-test.19tMRF/qemu-img" (No such file or directory) > ERROR:tests/libqos/libqos.c:192:mkimg: assertion failed: (ret && !err) > > Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> > --- > Slighly related is when vm-tests expect qemu-img available: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg08415.html > > $ make vm-build-ubuntu.i386 > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "source/qemu/tests/vm/basevm.py", line 236, in main > return vm.build_image(args.image) > File "tests/vm/ubuntu.i386", line 67, in build_image > subprocess.check_call(["qemu-img", "resize", img_tmp, "50G"]) > OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory > tests/vm/Makefile.include:23: recipe for target 'tests/vm/ubuntu.i386.img' failed > make: *** [tests/vm/ubuntu.i386.img] Error 2 > > A better fix would be checking those tools via ./configure... > --- > tests/Makefile.include | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include > index 75ad9c0dd3..679656b64a 100644 > --- a/tests/Makefile.include > +++ b/tests/Makefile.include > @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ tests/prom-env-test$(EXESUF): tests/prom-env-test.o $(libqos-obj-y) > tests/rtas-test$(EXESUF): tests/rtas-test.o $(libqos-spapr-obj-y) > tests/fdc-test$(EXESUF): tests/fdc-test.o > tests/ide-test$(EXESUF): tests/ide-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) > -tests/ahci-test$(EXESUF): tests/ahci-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) > +tests/ahci-test$(EXESUF): tests/ahci-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) qemu-img$(EXESUF) In [*] Cleber noticed if we configure using --disable-tools, qemu-img is still built by when running "make check-block" due to this rule. I think this is OK because - at least a test requires it, so this test will run (which is what we want) - while the tool is available in the build directory, it still won't be installed by "make install" [*] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-02/msg01947.html > tests/ipmi-kcs-test$(EXESUF): tests/ipmi-kcs-test.o > tests/ipmi-bt-test$(EXESUF): tests/ipmi-bt-test.o > tests/hd-geo-test$(EXESUF): tests/hd-geo-test.o >
On 2019-02-07 17:50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 2/5/19 1:18 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> Since the ahci-test uses qemu-img, add a dependency to build it >> before using it. >> This fixes: >> >> $ gmake check-qtest V=1 >> QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 QTEST_QEMU_IMG=qemu-img tests/ahci-test >> Failed to execute child process "/tmp/qemu-test.19tMRF/qemu-img" (No such file or directory) >> ERROR:tests/libqos/libqos.c:192:mkimg: assertion failed: (ret && !err) >> >> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> >> --- >> Slighly related is when vm-tests expect qemu-img available: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg08415.html >> >> $ make vm-build-ubuntu.i386 >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "source/qemu/tests/vm/basevm.py", line 236, in main >> return vm.build_image(args.image) >> File "tests/vm/ubuntu.i386", line 67, in build_image >> subprocess.check_call(["qemu-img", "resize", img_tmp, "50G"]) >> OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory >> tests/vm/Makefile.include:23: recipe for target 'tests/vm/ubuntu.i386.img' failed >> make: *** [tests/vm/ubuntu.i386.img] Error 2 >> >> A better fix would be checking those tools via ./configure... >> --- >> tests/Makefile.include | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include >> index 75ad9c0dd3..679656b64a 100644 >> --- a/tests/Makefile.include >> +++ b/tests/Makefile.include >> @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ tests/prom-env-test$(EXESUF): tests/prom-env-test.o $(libqos-obj-y) >> tests/rtas-test$(EXESUF): tests/rtas-test.o $(libqos-spapr-obj-y) >> tests/fdc-test$(EXESUF): tests/fdc-test.o >> tests/ide-test$(EXESUF): tests/ide-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) >> -tests/ahci-test$(EXESUF): tests/ahci-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) >> +tests/ahci-test$(EXESUF): tests/ahci-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) qemu-img$(EXESUF) > > In [*] Cleber noticed if we configure using --disable-tools, qemu-img is > still built by when running "make check-block" due to this rule. > > I think this is OK because > - at least a test requires it, so this test will run (which is what > we want) > - while the tool is available in the build directory, it still won't > be installed by "make install" I guess you could also introduce a CONFIG_TOOLS switch and only run the ahci test for CONFIG_TOOLS=y ? ... not that important, but in case you respin the series, maybe worth a try. Thomas
On 2/7/19 1:51 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 2019-02-07 17:50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> On 2/5/19 1:18 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> Since the ahci-test uses qemu-img, add a dependency to build it >>> before using it. >>> This fixes: >>> >>> $ gmake check-qtest V=1 >>> QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 QTEST_QEMU_IMG=qemu-img tests/ahci-test >>> Failed to execute child process "/tmp/qemu-test.19tMRF/qemu-img" (No such file or directory) >>> ERROR:tests/libqos/libqos.c:192:mkimg: assertion failed: (ret && !err) >>> >>> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> Slighly related is when vm-tests expect qemu-img available: >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg08415.html >>> >>> $ make vm-build-ubuntu.i386 >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> File "source/qemu/tests/vm/basevm.py", line 236, in main >>> return vm.build_image(args.image) >>> File "tests/vm/ubuntu.i386", line 67, in build_image >>> subprocess.check_call(["qemu-img", "resize", img_tmp, "50G"]) >>> OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory >>> tests/vm/Makefile.include:23: recipe for target 'tests/vm/ubuntu.i386.img' failed >>> make: *** [tests/vm/ubuntu.i386.img] Error 2 >>> >>> A better fix would be checking those tools via ./configure... >>> --- >>> tests/Makefile.include | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include >>> index 75ad9c0dd3..679656b64a 100644 >>> --- a/tests/Makefile.include >>> +++ b/tests/Makefile.include >>> @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ tests/prom-env-test$(EXESUF): tests/prom-env-test.o $(libqos-obj-y) >>> tests/rtas-test$(EXESUF): tests/rtas-test.o $(libqos-spapr-obj-y) >>> tests/fdc-test$(EXESUF): tests/fdc-test.o >>> tests/ide-test$(EXESUF): tests/ide-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) >>> -tests/ahci-test$(EXESUF): tests/ahci-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) >>> +tests/ahci-test$(EXESUF): tests/ahci-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) qemu-img$(EXESUF) >> >> In [*] Cleber noticed if we configure using --disable-tools, qemu-img is >> still built by when running "make check-block" due to this rule. >> >> I think this is OK because >> - at least a test requires it, so this test will run (which is what >> we want) >> - while the tool is available in the build directory, it still won't >> be installed by "make install" > > I guess you could also introduce a CONFIG_TOOLS switch and only run the > ahci test for CONFIG_TOOLS=y ? ... not that important, but in case you > respin the series, maybe worth a try. > > Thomas > Is this necessary? You can run ahci-test by itself without building tools, but you need to export QTEST_QEMU_IMG yourself, which you can absolutely point to some other copy you have. If you run "make check" though, it's going to use the built copy of qemu-img no matter what, isn't it? so what's so great about preserving a configuration where you ask it not to build tools and then intentionally try to execute tests that will necessarily fail because they can't find the qemu-img binary? This seems fine the way it is, because you are asking the computer: 1. Not to build tools, please 2. Actually, please make the tools so I can run the tests Convince me otherwise? --js
On 2/8/19 11:34 PM, John Snow wrote: > On 2/7/19 1:51 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 2019-02-07 17:50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> On 2/5/19 1:18 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>>> Since the ahci-test uses qemu-img, add a dependency to build it >>>> before using it. >>>> This fixes: >>>> >>>> $ gmake check-qtest V=1 >>>> QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 QTEST_QEMU_IMG=qemu-img tests/ahci-test >>>> Failed to execute child process "/tmp/qemu-test.19tMRF/qemu-img" (No such file or directory) >>>> ERROR:tests/libqos/libqos.c:192:mkimg: assertion failed: (ret && !err) >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> >>>> --- >>>> Slighly related is when vm-tests expect qemu-img available: >>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg08415.html >>>> >>>> $ make vm-build-ubuntu.i386 >>>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>>> File "source/qemu/tests/vm/basevm.py", line 236, in main >>>> return vm.build_image(args.image) >>>> File "tests/vm/ubuntu.i386", line 67, in build_image >>>> subprocess.check_call(["qemu-img", "resize", img_tmp, "50G"]) >>>> OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory >>>> tests/vm/Makefile.include:23: recipe for target 'tests/vm/ubuntu.i386.img' failed >>>> make: *** [tests/vm/ubuntu.i386.img] Error 2 >>>> >>>> A better fix would be checking those tools via ./configure... >>>> --- >>>> tests/Makefile.include | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include >>>> index 75ad9c0dd3..679656b64a 100644 >>>> --- a/tests/Makefile.include >>>> +++ b/tests/Makefile.include >>>> @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ tests/prom-env-test$(EXESUF): tests/prom-env-test.o $(libqos-obj-y) >>>> tests/rtas-test$(EXESUF): tests/rtas-test.o $(libqos-spapr-obj-y) >>>> tests/fdc-test$(EXESUF): tests/fdc-test.o >>>> tests/ide-test$(EXESUF): tests/ide-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) >>>> -tests/ahci-test$(EXESUF): tests/ahci-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) >>>> +tests/ahci-test$(EXESUF): tests/ahci-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) qemu-img$(EXESUF) >>> >>> In [*] Cleber noticed if we configure using --disable-tools, qemu-img is >>> still built by when running "make check-block" due to this rule. >>> >>> I think this is OK because >>> - at least a test requires it, so this test will run (which is what >>> we want) >>> - while the tool is available in the build directory, it still won't >>> be installed by "make install" >> >> I guess you could also introduce a CONFIG_TOOLS switch and only run the >> ahci test for CONFIG_TOOLS=y ? ... not that important, but in case you >> respin the series, maybe worth a try. >> >> Thomas >> > > Is this necessary? > > You can run ahci-test by itself without building tools, but you need to > export QTEST_QEMU_IMG yourself, which you can absolutely point to some > other copy you have. > > If you run "make check" though, it's going to use the built copy of > qemu-img no matter what, isn't it? so what's so great about preserving a > configuration where you ask it not to build tools and then intentionally > try to execute tests that will necessarily fail because they can't find > the qemu-img binary? > > This seems fine the way it is, because you are asking the computer: > > 1. Not to build tools, please > 2. Actually, please make the tools so I can run the tests I understand it the same way (although not being a computer). I wanted to check if what Cleber noticed could bother someone else, but I think the current behavior is the correct one. Also I wouldn't worry much about this corner case, the combination of having someone: - willing to run iotests AND ( - doesn't have qemu-img distrib-installed OR - ran configure with --disable-tools ) is *very* unlikely, as only 2 person reported this and both encountered this while working on QEMU testing. > Convince me otherwise? > --js >
diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include index 75ad9c0dd3..679656b64a 100644 --- a/tests/Makefile.include +++ b/tests/Makefile.include @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ tests/prom-env-test$(EXESUF): tests/prom-env-test.o $(libqos-obj-y) tests/rtas-test$(EXESUF): tests/rtas-test.o $(libqos-spapr-obj-y) tests/fdc-test$(EXESUF): tests/fdc-test.o tests/ide-test$(EXESUF): tests/ide-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) -tests/ahci-test$(EXESUF): tests/ahci-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) +tests/ahci-test$(EXESUF): tests/ahci-test.o $(libqos-pc-obj-y) qemu-img$(EXESUF) tests/ipmi-kcs-test$(EXESUF): tests/ipmi-kcs-test.o tests/ipmi-bt-test$(EXESUF): tests/ipmi-bt-test.o tests/hd-geo-test$(EXESUF): tests/hd-geo-test.o